Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T09:26:50.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MON 13200 Early Preplant Controls Giant Foxtail (Setaria Faberi) Season-Long in No-Till Soybean (Glycine Max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

George Kapusta
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Soil Sci., Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL 62901
Ronald F. Krausz
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Soil Sci., Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL 62901
Joseph L. Matthews
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Soil Sci., Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL 62901

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 1991 and 1992 to evaluate the duration of giant foxtail control in no-till soybean with MON 13200 alone and with imazaquin applied up to 2 mo prior to planting. MON 13200 at rates ranging from 224 to 448 g ai/ha applied up to 57 d before planting controlled 97 to 99% of giant foxtail averaged over years. MON 13200 plus imazaquin applied approximately 45 or 30 d before planting controlled 92 to 99% of giant foxtail compared with 53, 64, and 65% and 61, 69, and 78% in plots treated with alachlor, metolachlor, or pendimethalin plus imazaquin, respectively. Differences in control of giant foxtail among the herbicides evaluated were minimal when applied 15 or 0 d before planting. Little or no soybean injury was observed in 1991; up to 30% was observed in 1992 but final soybean height was not affected.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1991. CTIC National Survey of Conservation Tillage Practices. Executive Summary. Conservation Technology Information Center. W. Lafayette, IN. 14 p.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1992. CTIC National Crop Residue Management Survey. Conservation Technology Information Center, W. Lafayette, IN. 42 p.Google Scholar
3. Buhler, D. D. and Werling, V. L. 1989. Weed control from imazaquin and metolachlor in no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37: 392399.Google Scholar
4. Buhler, D. D. and Oplinger, E. S. 1990. Influence of tillage systems on annual weed densities and control in solid-seeded soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38:158165.Google Scholar
5. Carey, J. B. and DeFelice, M. S. 1991. Timing of chlorimuron and imazaquin application for weed control in no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 39:232237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Erbach, D. C., Wilkins, D. E., and Lovely, W. G. 1969. An evaluation of chemical and mechanical weed control for soybeans grown with no-plow systems. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control. Conf. 24:7475.Google Scholar
7. Gebhardt, M. R., Daniel, T. C., Schweizer, E. E., and Allamarus, R. R. 1985. Conservation Tillage. Science 230:625630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Kapusta, G. 1979. Seedbed tillage and herbicide influence on soybean (Glycine max) weed control and yield. Weed Sci. 27:520526.Google Scholar
9. Moomaw, R. S. and Martin, A. R. 1985. Herbicide evaluations for no-till soybean (Glycine max) production in corn (Zea mays) residue. Weed Sci. 33:679685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Staniforth, D. D. and Lovely, W. G. 1975. Weed control systems for no-till soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control. Conf. 30:60.Google Scholar
11. Stougaard, R. N., Kapusta, G., and Roskamp, G. 1984. Early preplant herbicide applications for no-till soybean (Glycine max) weed control. Weed Sci. 32:293298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Werling, V. L. and Buhler, D. D. 1988. Influence of application time of clomazone activity in no-till soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Sci. 36: 629635.Google Scholar
13. Wilson, J. S. and Worsham, A. D. 1988. Combinations of nonselective herbicides for difficult to control weeds in no-till corn, Zea mays and soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Sci. 36:648652.Google Scholar