Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T10:24:48.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula) Control with Imidazolinone and Sulfonylurea Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert N. Stougaard ,
Robert A. Masters  and
Scott J. Nissen
Robert N. Stougaard
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Robert A. Masters
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Scott J. Nissen
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to determine the efficacy of imidazolinone and sulfonylurea herbicides applied alone or in combination to control leafy spurge. Imazapyr (840 g ai/ha), imazethapyr (140 g/ha), sulfometuron (100 g/ha), and chlorsulfuron (20 g/ha) were applied in the fall on rangeland sites near Ainsworth and Columbus, NE. Imidazolinone and sulfonylurea herbicide combinations did not improve leafy spurge control nor affect forage grass yields when compared with herbicides applied alone. Imazapyr and sulfometuron were the most efficacious, providing greater than 80% leafy spurge control 9 mo after treatment (MAT). Imazethapyr provided 80% control of leafy spurge 9 MAT when applied to a coarse textured, low organic matter soil. In contrast, leafy spurge control was only 15% when imazethapyr was applied to a fine textured soil. Chlorsulfuron did not control leafy spurge, regardless of site characteristics. Imazapyr reduced perennial grass yields by more than 60%.

Keywords

Chlorsulfuron, 2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]benzenesulfonamideimazapyr, ±-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidimazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxlic acidsulfometuron, 2-[[[[(4,6-dimethyl-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidleafy spurge, Euphorbia esula L. # EPHESNoxious weedsrangelandchlorsulfuronimazapyrimazethapyrsulfometuronEPHES
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 494 - 498
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Beck, G. K., Lym, R. G., Becker, R. L., Ferrell, M. A., Finnerty, D. W., Frank, R. J., Henson, M. A., and Peterson, M. A. 1993. Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) control and grass injury with sulfometuron. Weed Technol. 7:212–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Duke, S. O. 1990. Overview of herbicide mechanisms of action. Environ. Health Perspec. 87:263–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Fales, S. L., Hill, R. R., and Hoover, R. J. 1990. Chemical regulation of growth and forage quality of cool-season grasses with imazethapyr. Agron. J. 82:9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Gylling, S. R. and Arnold, W. E. 1985. Efficacy and economics of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) control in pasture. Weed Sci. 33:381–385.Google Scholar
5. Lym, R. G. and Kirby, D. R. 1987. Cattle foraging behavior in leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula)-infested rangeland. Weed Technol. 1:314–318.Google Scholar
6. Lym, R. G. and Messersmith, C. G. 1990. Cost-effective long-term leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) control with herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:635–641.Google Scholar
7. Mangels, G. 1991. Behavior of the imidazolinone herbicides in soil—A review of the literature. p. 191–210 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
8. Masters, R. A., Stougaard, R. N., and Nissen, S. J. 1994. Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) control with fall-applied imazapyr, imazaquin, and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 8:58–63.Google Scholar
9. Morrow, L. A. 1979. Studies on the reproductive biology of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) . Weed Sci. 27:106–109.Google Scholar
10. Raju, M. V. S. 1985. Morphology and anatomy of leafy spurge. p. 26–41 in Watson, A. K., ed. Leafy spurge. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Monogr. 3. Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
11. SAS Institute, Inc. 1988. p. 405–420 in SAS Procedures Guide. Release 6.03 ed. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
12. Stougaard, R. N., Shea, P. J., and Martin, A. R. 1990. Effect of soil type and pH on adsorption, mobility and efficacy of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 38:67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Wilson, R. G. 1990. Effect of imazethapyr on six forage legumes. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:64.Google Scholar