Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T09:03:32.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control as Influenced by Timing of Asulam and Fertilizer/Cultivation Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Stacey A. Bruff
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. and Crop Physiol., 302 Life Sci. Bldg., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
James L. Griffin
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. and Crop Physiol., 302 Life Sci. Bldg., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Edward P. Richard Jr.
Affiliation:
Sugarcane Res. Unit. Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., P.O. Box 470. Houma. LA 70361

Abstract

Field studies were conducted over 3 yr to evaluate rhizome johnsongrass control with asulam applied POST at 3.7 kg ai/ha 3 d before fertilization (DBF) or 0, 3, 7, 10, or 14 d after fertilization (DAF). Liquid fertilizer (18-6-12) was applied with injector knives at 0, 112, or 224 kg N/ha 5 cm on each side of a 60-cm line of rhizome johnsongrass present on 1.8-m-wide conventional sugarcane beds. Johnsongrass response to timing of asulam application after fertilization varied among years but was not affected by fertilizer rate. Johnsongrass control with asulam applied 3 DBF was greater than applications made 0, 3, or 7 DAF. With one exception, differences in johnsongrass control following fertilization and asulam application times were also reflected in the biomass of treated johnsongrass and its regrowth harvested 6 and 10 wk after asulam application, respectively. Reduced johnsongrass control associated with asulam application following fertilization was related to stress from root/rhizome injury during fertilizer placement rather than the quantity of fertilizer applied.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1994. Controlling weeds in sugarcane. Louisiana Coop. Ext. Serv., Baton Rouge. Pub 2314 (5M) 16 p.Google Scholar
2. Bruff, S. A., Griffin, J. L., and Richard, E. P. Jr. 1995. Influence of rainfree period after asulam application on johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control. Weed Technol. 9:316320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Friesen, H. A. 1961. Some factors affecting the control of wild oats with barban. Weed Sci. 9:185194.Google Scholar
4. Geisler, D. and Ferree, D. C. 1984. Response of plants to root pruning. Hortic. Rev. 6:155188.Google Scholar
5. Humphries, E. C. 1958. Effect of removal of a part of the root system on the subsequent growth of the root and shoot. Ann. Bot. 22:251257.Google Scholar
6. Matherne, R. J. 1974. The effect of number of cultivations on sugarcane production in Louisiana. Proc. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 4(NS): 109112.Google Scholar
7. Millhollon, R. W. 1977. Sugarcane (Saccharum) production with minimum cultivation, fenac. and terbacil. Weed Sci. 25:431436.Google Scholar
8. Nalewaja, J. D. and Woznica, Z. 1988. Effect of environment and adjuvants on asulam phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 36:367372.Google Scholar
9. Richard, E. P. Jr. 1986. Influence of surfactants on the toxicity of asulam to johnsongrass (Sorghum halepens) and sugarcane (Saccharum sp.). Weed Sci. 34:299303.Google Scholar
10. Richard, E. P. Jr. 1990. Timing effects on johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control with asulam in sugarcane (Saccharum sp.). Weed Technol. 4:8186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Richard, E. P. Jr. 1991. Optimizing diluent volume improves johnsongrass control in sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) with asulam. Weed Technol. 5:363368.Google Scholar
12. Richard, E. P. Jr. and Griffin, J. L. 1993. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) with asulam applied alone and in mixtures. Weed Technol. 7:657667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Schmid, B. and Bazzaz, F. A. 1987. Clonal integration and population structure in perennials: Effects of severing rhizome connections. Ecology 68:20162022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Yadav, R. L. and Sharma, R. K. 1983. Effect of nitrogen application to the plant crop of sugarcane on the yield and quality of the subsequent ratoon crop. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 53:3843.Google Scholar
15. Yadav, R. L., Kumar, R., and Verma, R. S. 1990. Effects of nitrogen applied through new carriers on yield and quality of sugarcane. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 114:225230.Google Scholar