Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T14:50:52.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interactions of Sethoxydim and Corn (Zea mays) Postemergence Broadleaf Herbicides on Three Annual Grasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Bryan G. Young ,
Stephen E. Hart  and
Loyd M. Wax
Bryan G. Young
Affiliation:
Crop Science Dep., Univ. of Illinois and USDA-ARS, Urbana, IL 61801
Stephen E. Hart
Affiliation:
Crop Science Dep., Univ. of Illinois and USDA-ARS, Urbana, IL 61801
Loyd M. Wax
Affiliation:
Crop Science Dep., Univ. of Illinois and USDA-ARS, Urbana, IL 61801
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse and laboratory studies were conducted to determine the effect of 22 postemergence corn broadleaf herbicide combinations on the efficacy of sethoxydim applied to giant foxtail, large crabgrass, and shattercane. Eighteen combinations caused a reduction in sethoxydim efficacy on at least one grass species. Dicamba, atrazine plus dicamba, atrazine plus bentazon, bromoxynil, primisulfuron, CGA-152005 plus primisulfuron, MON 12000, and flumetsulam plus clopyralid plus 2,4-D (NAF-73) were evaluated further on the efficacy and foliar absorption of sethoxydim applied to giant foxtail, large crabgrass, and shattercane. In timing studies, applying all herbicide combinations at 7 or 3 d before sethoxydim application eliminated significant antagonistic interactions. However, applying NAF-73, primisulfuron, or CGA-152005 plus primisulfuron 1 d prior resulted in a reduction in sethoxydim efficacy on at least one grass species. Dicamba, atrazine plus dicamba, and atrazine plus bentazon decreased 14C-sethoxydim absorption 9 to 63% across grass species. Replacing crop oil concentrate (COC) with DASH increased sethoxydim absorption when applied with these herbicides but not to the full extent of sethoxydim applied alone with DASH. Sethoxydim efficacy was retained or improved with DASH when applied with dicamba, atrazine plus dicamba, atrazine plus bentazon, or bromoxynil. When primisulfuron, CGA-152005 plus primisulfuron, MON 12000, or NAF-73 was applied with 14C-sethoxydim no effect on sethoxydim absorption was observed. DASH was less effective than COC at restoring sethoxydim efficacy when applied with these herbicides.

Keywords

bromoxynil, 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrileclopyralid, 3,6-dichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acid2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic aciddicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acidDASH, high concentrate, oil-based adjuvantgiant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. # SETFAlarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSAshattercane, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench # SORVUcorn, Zea mays L.Adjuvantherbicide antagonismDigitaria sanguinalisSetaria faberiSorghum bicolorDIGSASETFASORVU
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 914 - 922
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H., ed. 1994. Herbicide Handbook, 7th ed. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Champaign, IL p. 266–268.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C. 1992. Rationale for developing herbicide-resistant crops. Weed Technol. 6:621–625.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. R. and Penner, D. 1982. Compatibility of diclofop and BAS 9052 with bentazon. Weed Sci. 30:458–462.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. R. and Penner, D. 1985a. Abiotic transformations of sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 33:435–439.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. R. and Penner, D. 1985b. Sethoxydim metabolism in monocotyledonous and dictyledonous plants. Weed Sci. 33:771–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dexter, A. G., Burnside, O. C., and Lavy, T. L. 1966. Factors influencing the phytotoxicity of foliar applications of atrazine. Weeds 3:222–228.Google Scholar
Dotray, P. A., Marshall, L. C., Parker, W. B., Wyse, D. L., Somers, D. A., and Gengenback, B. G. 1993. Herbicide tolerance and weed control in sethoxydim-tolerant corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 41:213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, K. L. and Coble, H. D. 1994. Effect of DPX-PE350 on the efficacy of graminicides. Weed Sci. 42:222–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grichar, W. J. 1991. Sethoxydim and broadleaf herbicide interaction effects on annual grass control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 5:321–324.Google Scholar
Hart, S. E., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1992. Influence of adjuvants on the efficacy, absorption, and spray retention of primisulfuron. Weed Technol. 6:592–598.Google Scholar
Hartzler, R. G. and Foy, C. L. 1983. Compatibility of BAS 9052 OH with acifluorfen and bentazon. Weed Sci. 31:597–599.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. G., Williams, B. J., Albright, J. W., and Anthon, T. M. 1994. Annual weed management in sethoxydim-tolerant field corn study. Res. Rep., North Cent. Weed. Sci. Soc. 51:73–78.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. G., Williams, B. J., Albright, J. W., and Anthon, T. M. 1995. Annual weed management in sethoxydim-tolerant field corn study. Res. Rep., North Cent. Weed. Sci. Soc. 52:176–180.Google Scholar
Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:1–63.Google Scholar
Holshouser, D. L. and Coble, H. D. 1990. Compatibility of sethoxydim with five postemergence broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:128–133.Google Scholar
Hosaka, H., Inaba, H., and Ishikawa, H. 1984. Response of monocotyledons to BAS 9052 OH. Weed Sci. 32:28–32.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., and Corbin, F. J. 1989. Effect of ammonium sulfate and bentazon on sethoxydim absorption. Weed Technol. 3:674–677.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1993a. Interactions of DPX-PE350 with fluazifop-p, sethoxydim, clethodim, and quizalofop-p. Weed Technol. 7:605–610.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Smith, M. C., McClelland, M. R., and Frans, R. E. 1993b. Weed control with bromoxynil applied alone and with graminicides. Weed Technol. 7:835–839.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L. and York, A. C. 1989. Effects of ammonium fertilizers and BCH 81508 S on antagonism with sethoxydim plus bentazon mixtures. Weed Technol. 3:450–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskinen, W. C., Reynolds, K. M., Buhler, D. D., Wyse, D. L., Barber, B. L., and Jarvis, L. J. 1993. Persistence and movement of sethoxydim residues in three Minnesota soils. Weed Sci. 41:634–640.Google Scholar
Marshall, L. C., Dotray, P. A., Gengenback, B. G., Wyse, D. L., and Gronwald, J. W. 1992. Allelic mutations in acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase confer herbicide tolerance in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:435–442.Google Scholar
Minton, B. W., Kurtz, M. E., and Shaw, D. R. 1989. Postemergence grass and broadleaf herbicide interactions for red rice (Oryza sativa) control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:329–334.Google Scholar
Mueller, T. C., Witt, W. W., and Barrett, M. 1989. Antagonism of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control with fenoxaprop, haloxyfop, and sethoxydim by 2,4-D. Weed Technol. 3:86–89.Google Scholar
Myers, P. F. and Coble, H. D. 1992. Antagonism of graminicide activity on annual grass species by imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 6:333–338.Google Scholar
Parker, W. B., Marshall, L. C., Burton, J. D., Somers, D. A., Wyse, D. L., Gronwald, J. W., and Gengenback, B. G. 1990. Dominant mutations causing alterations in acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase confer tolerance to cyclohexanedione and aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 87:7175–7179.Google Scholar
Rendina, A. R. and Felts, J. M. 1988. Cyclohexanedione herbicides are selective and potent inhibitors of acetyl-CoA carboxylase from grasses. Plant Physiol. 86:983–986.Google Scholar
Rhodes, G. N. and Coble, H. D. 1984a. Influence of application variables on antagonism between sethoxydim and bentazon. Weed Sci. 32:436–441.Google Scholar
Rhodes, G. N. and Coble, H. D. 1984b. Influence of bentazon on absorption and translocation of sethoxydim in goosegrass (Eleusine indica L.) Weed Sci. 32:595–597.Google Scholar
Roslycky, E. B. 1986. Microbial response to sethoxydim and its degradation in soil. Can. J. Soil Sci. 66:411–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoaf, A. R. and Carlson, W. C. 1992. Stability of sethoxydim and its degradation products in solution, in soil, and on surfaces. Weed Sci. 40:384–389.Google Scholar
Smith, A. E. and Hsiao, A. I. 1983. Persistence studies with the herbicide sethoxydim in prairie soils. Weed Res. 23:253–257.Google Scholar
Stoltenberg, D. E., Gronwald, J. W., Wyse, D. L., Burton, J. D., Somers, D. A., and Gengenback, B. G. 1989. Effect of sethoxydim and haloxyfop on acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase activity in Festuca species. Weed Sci. 37:512–516.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. Jr. and Slife, F. W. 1969. Foliar and root absorption of atrazine applied postemergence to giant foxtail Weed Sci 17:251–256.Google Scholar
Wanamarta, G., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1989. The basis of bentazon antagonism on sethoxydim absorption and activity. Weed Sci. 37:400–404.Google Scholar
Whitwell, T., Wehtje, G., Walker, R. H., and McGuire, J. A. 1985. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in soybeans (Glycine max) with postemergence grass herbicides applied alone and in mixtures. Weed Sci. 33:673–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, B. G., Hart, S. E., and Maxwell, D. J. 1995. Postemergence weed control systems for sethoxydim resistant corn. Urbana, IL, 1995. Res. Rep., North Cent. Weed. Sci. Soc. 52:210–211.Google Scholar