Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:25:23.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integration of Glyphosate and Quizalofop with Tillage for Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) Management in Continuous Annual Crop and Legume Plowdown Rotations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. Lloyd Darwent ,
George W. Clayton ,
James C. Drabble ,
Peter F. Mills  and
Mark S. Wolynetz
A. Lloyd Darwent
Affiliation:
North. Agric. Res. Cent., Agric. & Agri-Food Can., Beaverlodge, AB T0H 0C0
George W. Clayton
Affiliation:
North. Agric. Res. Cent., Agric. & Agri-Food Can., Beaverlodge, AB T0H 0C0
James C. Drabble
Affiliation:
North. Agric. Res. Cent., Agric. & Agri-Food Can., Beaverlodge, AB T0H 0C0
Peter F. Mills
Affiliation:
North. Agric. Res. Cent., Agric. & Agri-Food Can., Beaverlodge, AB T0H 0C0
Mark S. Wolynetz
Affiliation:
Agric. and Agri-Food Can., Bldg. 54, Central Exp. Farm, Ottawa, ON K1A0C6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A field study was conducted from 1987 to 1992 to determine the effectiveness of several treatments consisting of combinations of glyphosate and/or quizalofop with tillage to control quackgrass in legume plowdown and continuous annual crop rotations. The treatments were imposed on the quackgrass in 1987 and/or 1988, evaluated in 1989 (cycle 1), reimposed on the same plots in 1990 and/or 1991 and re-evaluated in 1992 (cycle 2). Where continuous barley was grown, glyphosate applied at 0.45 kg/ha before seeding in 1987 (cycle 1) and 1990 (cycle 2), and combined with fall tillage in the first two years of each cycle, reduced quackgrass shoot density and rhizome dry weight by more than 96%. In a legume plowdown rotation, consisting of barley underseeded to red clover followed by plowdown and barley in subsequent years, quackgrass was reduced by a similar amount by glyphosate at 0.45 kg/ha applied in 1987 and 1990 before seeding or in 1988 and 1991 at 5 d before or 6 wk after red clover plowdown. Quackgrass reduction from all of these treatments was as effective as the labelled rate of glyphosate (0.90 kg/ha) applied at the same times, and also as effective as glyphosate applied at 0.45 kg/ha in combination with tillage in a year of fallow. Without fall tillage the efficacy of glyphosate applied before seeding was reduced. Quizalofop at 0.20 kg/ha applied to canola in a rotation of canola followed by two years of barley, reduced quackgrass, but was less effective than glyphosate treatments with fall tillage. Reducing quackgrass populations resulted in significant increases in crop yields.

Keywords

Glyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycinequizalofop, (±)-2-[4-[(6-chloro-2-quinoxyalinyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidquackgrass, Elytrigia repens (L.) Nevski # AGRREbarley, Hordeum vulgare L.canola, Brassica rapa L. Em. Metzgred clover, Trifolium pratense L.Cultural controlintegrated weed controltillage
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 923 - 930
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alberta Agriculture. 1995. Crop protection with chemicals. Alberta Agric. Agdex 606. 347 p.Google Scholar
Alex, J. F. 1987. Quack grass: origin, distribution, description and taxonomy, p. 1–16 in Glick, H. L., ed., Quackgrass Action Committee Workshop, Tech. Proc., Winnipeg, MB.Google Scholar
Cussans, G. W. 1968. The growth and development of Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. in competition with cereals, field beans and oilseed rape. Proc. 9th Br. Weed Control Conf. 131–136.Google Scholar
Cussans, G. W. 1970. Biological background to the control of rhizomatous grasses. Proc. 10th Br. Weed Control Conf. 1101–1107.Google Scholar
Darwent, A. L., Baig, M. N., Lefkovitch, L. P., and Gallagher, A. W. 1989. Control of quackgrass in fallow from several glyphosate plus tillage treatments and its effect on the subsequent yield of barley. Can. J. Plant Sci. 69:1207–1215.Google Scholar
Dyke, G. V. and Barnard, A. J. 1976. Suppression of couch grass by Italian ryegrass and broad red clover undersown in barley and field beans. J. Agric. Sci., Cambridge, 587:123–126.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N. and O'Sullivan, P. A. 1993. Herbicide comparisons on quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) within different crop competition and tillage conditions. Weed Sci. 41:94–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivany, J. A., Leroux, G., and Sanderson, J. B. 1990. Survey of quackgrass importance and research priority, March 1989. Proc. Quackgrass Symp., London, ON. p. 1–15.Google Scholar
Kirkland, K. 1987. Influence of crop rotation and tillage on quackgrass. p. 111–127 in Glick, H. L., ed., Quackgrass Action Committee Workshop, Tech. Proc., Winnipeg, MB.Google Scholar
Landstrom, S. 1983. Control of Agropyron repens in different cropping systems. Proc. Swedish Weed Control Conf. Uppsala, 1:246–256.Google Scholar
Larelle, D. 1986. [Couch (Elymus repens) control with haloxyfop-ethoxyethyl in beet, rape and sunflower crops.] Lutte contre le chiendent (Elymus repens) avec l'haloxyfop ethyoxy ethyl dans les cultures de betteraaves, colza et tournesol. interet dans les rotations. In Comptes Rendus la 13e Conference du COLUMA. Tome I, 149–157.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1987. GENSTAT—A Generalized Statistical Program. The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd. Oxford, U.K. Google Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T. 1991. Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) interference in canola (Brassica campestris). Weed Sci. 39:397–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Painparay, G., Torcheux, R., and Verrier, C. 1986. [The use of fluazifop-P-butyl to control couch (Elymus repens) in a rotation.] Utilisation de fluazifop-P-butyl pour lutter contre le chiendent (Elymus repens) dans la rotation. In Comptes Rendus de la 13e Conference du COLUMA. Tome I. 158–167.Google Scholar
Pessala, B. 1981. Agropyron repens and the rotation. Proc. Swedish Weed Control Conf., Uppsala, 1:181–182.Google Scholar
Werner, P. A. and Rioux, R. 1977. The biology of Canadian weeds. 24. Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:905–919.Google Scholar