Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T02:56:46.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In-Season Applications of Glyphosate for Control of Redvine (Brunnichia ovata) in Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

D. Scott Akin  and
David R. Shaw
D. Scott Akin
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: dshaw@weedscience.msstate.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An experiment was initiated at two sites in 1998 near Crowder, MS, to evaluate the effect of in-season applications of glyphosate on redvine populations in glyphosate-resistant soybean. In the year of application, most treatments containing multiple in-season applications of glyphosate reduced redvine populations. However, at 16 mo after treatment (October 1999), 0.63 kg ai/ha paraquat preplant followed by sequential postemergence applications of glyphosate at 1.1 and 2.2 kg ai/ ha reduced redvine stems by 45% compared with the untreated check. Redvine control with this treatment also was comparable with 2.2 kg ai/ha dicamba preharvest. The same results were observed at 12 and 14 mo after application with many treatments containing sequential applications of glyphosate, but glyphosate at 1.1 and 2.2 kg ai/ha was the only in-season treatment to maintain redvine suppression during the entire growing season the year after herbicide application. However, a number of treatments delayed redvine reinfestation; thus, soybean yield was improved over the untreated check with all treatments from the previous year containing in-season applications of glyphosate, except for 0.84 kg/ha followed by 0.56 kg/ha. Increasing rates of in-season glyphosate applications to 1.1 followed by 2.2 kg/ha will adequately suppress redvine populations in glyphosate-resistant soybean, controlling annual weeds in the process.

Keywords

Redvine, Brunnichia ovata (Walt.) Shinners # BRVCIsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Asgrow 4701’, ‘Delta & Pine Land 5644’Perennial weedsglyphosatePOST, postemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , June 2004 , pp. 325 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H. 1994. Glyphosate. in Ahrens, W. H., ed. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. Pp. 149–152.Google Scholar
Akin, D. S. and Shaw, D. R. 2001. Purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control in glyphosate-tolerant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 15:564–570.Google Scholar
Akin, D. S., Shaw, D. R., and Norris, J. L. 1999. Efficacy of ALS-inhibiting broadleaf herbicides tank-mixed with Roundup Ultra in Roundup Ready soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:54.Google Scholar
Baker, R. S. 1979. Redvine growth and control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:267–270.Google Scholar
Castillo, T. A., Oliver, L. R., and Keisling, T. C. 1999. Cultural and chemical redvine (Brunnichia ovata) control in soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:47.Google Scholar
DeFelice, M. S. 1980. Redvine (Brunnichia cirrhosa) and Trumpetcreeper (Campsis radicans) Control for Soybeans and Grain Sorghum in Arkansas. M.S. thesis. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR. 82 p.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1992. Weed survey—southern states. Broadleaf crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:392–407.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1995. Weed survey—southern states. Broadleaf crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:290–305.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1998. Weed survey—southern states. Broadleaf crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:299–313.Google Scholar
Elkins, W. C. 1997. Comparison of Roundup with Conventional Herbicides for In-season and Pre-harvest Weed Control in Mississippi Row Crops. M.S. thesis. Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS. 35 p.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. D. 1984. Perennial Vines in the Delta of Mississippi. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station Information Bull. 927. 9 p.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. D. 1989. Weed survey—southern states. Broadleaf crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:408–420.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. D., Heatherly, L. G., and Wesley, R. A. 1989. Perennial Vine Competition and Control. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station Information Bull. 964. 5 p.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. D., Heatherly, L. G., and Wesley, R. A. 1995. Weed control in no-till doublecrop soybean (Glycine max) following winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) on a clay soil. Weed Technol. 9:306–315.Google Scholar
Franz, J. E., Mao, M. K., and Sikorski, J. A. 1997. Glyphosate—A Unique Global Herbicide. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. Pp. 143–186.Google Scholar
Geiger, D. R. and Bestman, H. D. 1990. Self-limitation of herbicide mobility by phytotoxic action. Weed Sci. 38:324–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harker, K. N. and Dekker, J. 1988. Effects of phenology on translocation patterns of several herbicides in quackgrass, Agropyron repens . Weed Sci. 36:463–472.Google Scholar
Hurst, H. R. 1994. Redvine Response to Late-Season Herbicide Tillage Combinations on Lay-Out Land. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station Research Rep. 19, no. 3. 3 p.Google Scholar
Hurst, H. R., Williford, R., and Wooten, O. B. 1979. Redvine control in cotton. in Brown, J. M., ed. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference of the National Cotton Council of America; Memphis, TN; 1979. Pp. 145–147.Google Scholar
Jeffery, L. S., English, J. R., and Connell, J. 1981. The effects of fall application of glyphosate on corn (Zea mays), soybeans (Glycine max), and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci. 29:190–195.Google Scholar
Kline, W. L. and Selleck, G. W. 1978. Factors affecting hedge bindweed control with glyphosate. Proc. Annu. Meet. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:283.Google Scholar
Padgette, S. R., Kolacz, K. H., and Delannay, X. et al. 1995. Development, identification, and characterization of a glyphosate-tolerant soybean line. Crop Sci. 35:1451–1461.Google Scholar
Radford, A. E., Ahles, H. E., and Bell, C. R. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press. P. 417.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. R., Arnold, J. C., Snipes, C. E., Laughlin, D. H., and Mills, J. A. 2001. Comparison of glyphosate-resistant and nontransgenic soybean (Glycine max) herbicide systems. Weed Technol. 15:676–685.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. R. and Mack, R. E. 1991. Application timing of herbicides for the control of redvine. Weed Technol. 5:125–129.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. R., Mack, R. E., and Smith, C. A. 1991. Redvine (Brunnichia ovata) germination and emergence. Weed Sci. 39:33–36.Google Scholar
Smith, M. C., Shaw, D. R., and Shankle, M. W. 1998. Optimization of glyphosate rate and application timing for weed control in Mississippi glyphosate-tolerant soybean. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 38:1.22.Google Scholar
Sprankle, P., Meggitt, W. F., and Pinner, D. 1975. Absorption, action, and translocation of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 23:235–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapleton, G. S. and Kendig, J. A. 1999. The benefits of an imazaquin-based soil-applied herbicide followed by glyphosate versus total postemergence glyphosate systems as related to application timings, number of applications, and soybean yield. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:56.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2001. Weed survey—Southern States. Broadleaf crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:244–259.Google Scholar
Weller, S. C. and Skroch, W. A. 1983. Toxicity of glyphosate to peach trees as influenced by application timing. Hortic. Sci. 18:940–941.Google Scholar
Wiese, A. F. and Lavake, D. E. 1985. Control of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) with postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 34:77–80.Google Scholar
Yonce, M. H. and Skroch, W. A. 1989. Control of selected perennial weeds with glyphosate. Weed Sci. 37:360–364.Google Scholar