Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:56:47.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dose-Responses of Weeds and Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) to MON 37500

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Patrick W. Geier  and
Phillip W. Stahlman
Patrick W. Geier
Affiliation:
Kansas State Univ. Agric. Res. Ctr-Hays, Hays, KS 67601
Phillip W. Stahlman
Affiliation:
Kansas State Univ. Agric. Res. Ctr-Hays, Hays, KS 67601
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse studies determined the dose-responses of cheat, downy brome, Japanese brome, jointed goatgrass, and winter wheat to preplant-incorporated MON 37500 and its residual effects on kochia. Concentrations of MON 37500 up to 60 ppbw did not affect winter wheat. MON 37500 did not prevent weed emergence, but increasingly inhibited weed growth as the dose was increased up to about 20 ppbw. GR50 values were 16, 16, 11, and 31 ppbw for cheat, downy brome, Japanese brome, and jointed goatgrass, respectively. Japanese brome was more susceptible than cheat or downy brome, and jointed goatgrass tolerated two to three times more MON 37500 than the Bromus species. Plant dry weights of kochia seeded after removal of the winter annual grasses decreased with increasing initial MON 37500 concentrations up to 20 ppbw. Kochia density was influenced by which winter annual grass was grown previously.

Keywords

MON 37500, 1-(2-ethylsulfonylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-3-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)ureacheat, Bromus secalinus L. # BROSEdowny brome, Bromus tectorum L. # BROTEJapanese brome, Bromus japonicus Thunb. ex Murr. # BROJAjointed goatgrass, Aegilops cylindrica Host # AEGCYkochia, Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. # KCHSCwinter wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Ike.’Aegilops cylindricaBromus japonicusBromus secalinusBromus tectorumKochia scopariaAEGCYBROJABROSEBROTEKCHSC
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 870 - 875
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1995. Agricultural chemical usage, 1994 field crops summary. U.S. Dep. Agric., Natl. Agric. Stat. Serv., Econ. Res. Serv. 106 p.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. L. 1993. Jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) ecology and interference in winter wheat. Weed Sci. 41:388–393.Google Scholar
Chism, W. J., Birch, J. B., and Bingham, S. W. 1992. Nonlinear regressions for analyzing growth stage and quinclorac interactions. Weed Technol. 8:898–903.Google Scholar
Donald, W. W. and Ogg, A. G. 1991. Biology and control of jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica). a review. Weed Technol. 5:3–17.Google Scholar
Driver, J. E., Peeper, T. F., and Koscelny, J. A. 1993. Cheat (Bromus secalinus) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Technol. 7:851–854.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, D. R. and Shea, P. J. 1986. Effect of soil pH on degradation, movement, and plant uptake of chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 34:328–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, R. L. 1987. The annual species of Bromus (Poaceae) in Kansas. Contr. Univ. Kansas Herb. No. 26. 11 p.Google Scholar
Morrow, L. A. and Stahlman, P. W. 1984. The history and distribution of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in North America. Weed Sci. 32, Suppl. 1:2–6.Google Scholar
Moyer, J. R., Esau, R., and Kozub, G. C. 1990. Chlorsulfuron persistence and response of nine rotational crops in alkaline soils of southern Alberta. Weed Technol. 4:543–548.Google Scholar
Neider, T. L. and Miller, S. D. 1993. Effects of winter annual grass weeds in winter wheat. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:33.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. 1993. Jointed goatgrass survey 1993—Magnitude and scope of the problem. Jointed Goatgrass Symp. Proc., Denver, CO. p. 6–12.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. L., Moshier, L. J., and Ebert, C. T. 1992. Factors influencing sulfonylurea herbicide activity on three winter annual brome grasses. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:16–17.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. L. and Stahlman, P. W. 1995. Kansas winter annual grass weeds in winter wheat. Kansas State Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv. MF-2085. 20 p.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. A. and Arnold, W. E. 1985. Response of rotational crops to soil residues of chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 34:131–136.Google Scholar
Ratliff, R. L. and Peeper, T. F. 1987. Bromus control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with the ethylthio analog of metribuzin, Weed Technol. 1:235–241.Google Scholar
Runyan, T. J., McNeil, W. K., and Peeper, T. F. 1982. Differential tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 30:94–97.Google Scholar
Rydrych, D. J. and Muzik, T. J. 1968. Downy brome competition and control in dryland wheat. Agron. J. 60:279–280.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. 1992. SAS Users Guide: Statistics. Version 6.03. SAS Inst., Inc. Cary, NC, 1028 p.Google Scholar
Smith, A. E. and Hsiao, A I. 1985. Transformation and persistence of chlorsulfuron in prairie field soils. Weed Sci. 33:555–557.Google Scholar
Stahlman, P. W. and El-Hamid, M. A. 1994. Sulfonylurea herbicides suppress downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 8:812–818.Google Scholar
Stahlman, P. W. and Miller, S. D. 1990. Downy brome (Bromus tectorum) interference and economic thresholds in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 38:224–228.Google Scholar
Thirunarayanan, K., Zimdahl, R. L., and Smika, D. E. 1985. Chlorsulfuron adsorption and degradation in soil. Weed Sci. 33:558–563.Google Scholar
Wiese, A. F., Wood, M. L., and Chenault, E. W. 1988. Persistence of sulfonylureas in Pullman clay loam. Weed Technol. 2:251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar