Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:54:48.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of Soybean Cyst Nematode on Henbit (Lamium amplexicaule) and Purple Deadnettle (Lamium purpureum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

J. Earl Creech
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Jared S. Webb
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Agricultural Systems, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
Bryan G. Young
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Agricultural Systems, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
Jason P. Bond
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Agricultural Systems, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
S Kent Harrison
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43201
Virginia R. Ferris
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Jamal Faghihi
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Andreas Westphal
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
William G. Johnson*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: wgj@purdue.edu

Abstract

A survey of seven production fields in Indiana, Illinois, and Ohio was conducted to assess henbit and purple deadnettle growth and soybean cyst nematode (SCN) development and reproduction on these weeds. Autumn and spring growth of purple deadnettle and henbit was influenced by location within each state. In general, winter annual weeds were larger in size and reached maturity earlier in the spring at the southern sample sites than those in the north. All growth stages of SCN were found to be associated with henbit and purple deadnettle at both autumn and spring sample timings. SCN juveniles were generally found infecting roots at highest abundance in the spring. SCN cyst and egg production also were widespread and occurred to a much higher degree during the autumn than the spring developmental period. The results of this survey indicate that management tactics designed to minimize the potential for SCN reproduction on winter annual weeds would probably be most effective if conducted in the autumn, when the majority of SCN reproduction occurred. However, spring populations of winter annual weeds that harbor SCN juveniles might facilitate additional SCN reproduction and population increase if the weeds are not controlled in a timely manner prior to planting.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alston, D. G. and Schmitt, D. P. 1988. Development of Heterodera glycines life stages as influenced by temperature. J. Nematol. 20:366372.Google ScholarPubMed
Barnes, J. W., Johnson, W. G., Nelson, K. A., and Dewell, R. A. 2003. Impact of spring-applied, residual herbicides on winter annual weed populations after crop harvest. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 58:131.Google Scholar
Bonner, M. J. and Schmitt, D. P. 1985. Population dynamics of Heterodera glycines life stages on soybean. J. Nematol. 17:153158.Google ScholarPubMed
Byrd, D. W. Jr, Kirkpatrick, T., and Barker, K. R. 1983. An improved technique for clearing and staining plant tissues for detection of nematodes. J. Nematol. 15:142143.Google Scholar
Chen, S. Y. 2004. Management with biological methods. Pages 207242. in Schmitt, D.P., Wrather, J.A., Riggs, R.D. eds. Biology and Management of Soybean Cyst Nematode: 2nd ed. Marceline, MO Schmitt and Associates.Google Scholar
Creech, J. E. and Johnson, W. G. 2006. Survey of broadleaf winter weeds in Indiana production fields infested with soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines). Weed Technol. 20:10661075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creech, J. E., Johnson, W. G., Conley, S. P., Santini, J. B., and Westphal, A. 2007. Purple deadnettle (Lamium purpureum) and soybean cyst nematode response to cold temperature regimes. Weed Sci. 55:592598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creech, J. E., Johnson, W. G., Faghihi, J., Ferris, V. R., and Westphal, A. 2005. First report of soybean cyst nematode reproduction on purple deadnettle under field conditions. Crop Management. http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/cm/. DOI: 10.1094/CM-2005-0715-01-BR. Accessed: February 2, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faghihi, J. and Ferris, J. M. 2000. An efficient new device to release eggs from Heterodera glycines . J. Nematol. 32:411413.Google ScholarPubMed
Faghihi, J., Ferris, J. M., and Ferris, V. R. 1986. Heterodera glycines in Indiana: I. Reproduction of geographical isolates on soybean differentials. J. Nematol. 18:169172.Google ScholarPubMed
Faghihi, J. and Ferris, V. R. 2006. Soybean cyst nematode. Department of Entomology. Purdue University. http://www.entm.purdue.edu/Entomology/ext/targets/e-series/EseriesPDF/E-210.pdf. Accessed October 20, 2006.Google Scholar
Gibson, K. D., Johnson, W. G., and Hillger, D. E. 2005. Farmer perceptions of problematic corn and soybean weeds in Indiana. Weed Technol. 19:10651070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heatherly, L. G. and Young, L. D. 1991. Soybean and soybean cyst nematode response to soil water content in loam and clay soil. Crop Sci. 31:191196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heatherly, L. G., Young, L. D., Epps, J. M., and Hartwig, E. E. 1982. Effect of upper-profile soil water potential on numbers of cysts of Heterodera glycines on soybeans. Crop Sci. 22:833835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, N. S. and Schmitt, D. P. 1989. Influence of temperature and soybean phenology on dormancy induction of Heterodera glycines . J. Nematol. 21:361369.Google ScholarPubMed
Krausz, R. F., Young, B. G., and Matthews, J. L. 2003. Winter annual weed control with fall-applied corn (Zea mays) herbicides. Weed Technol. 17:516520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niblack, T. L. 2005. Soybean cyst nematode reconsidered. Plant Dis. 89:10201026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nice, G. and Johnson, B. 2005. Indiana's top ten most problematic weeds. Purdue University Weed Science Extension Bulletin. http://www.btny.purdue.edu/weedscience/2005/topten05.pdf. Accessed October 20, 2006.Google Scholar
Riggs, R. D. 1992. Host Range. Pages 107114. in Riggs, R.D., Wrather, J.A. eds. Biology and Management of the Soybean Cyst Nematode. St. Paul, MN American Phytopathological Society.Google Scholar
Ross, J. P. 1963. Seasonal variation of larval emergence from cysts of the soybean cyst nematode, Heterodera glycines . Phytopathology 53:608609.Google Scholar
J.F. Southey, ed. 1970. Laboratory Methods for Work with Plant and Soil Nematodes. Technical Bulletin 2. London, United Kingdom Her Majesty's Stationery Office. 148.Google Scholar
Tyler, D. D., Chambers, A. Y., and Young, L. D. 1987. No-tillage effects on population dynamics of soybean cyst nematode. Agron. J. 79:799802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkatesh, R., Harrison, S. K., and Riedel, R. M. 2000. Weed hosts of soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines) in Ohio. Weed Technol. 14:156160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, G. A., Burnside, O. C., and Felton, W. L. 1994. Weed control in conservation tillage systems. Pages 211244. in Unger, P.W. ed. Managing Agricultural Residues. Boca Raton, FL Lewis.Google Scholar
Wrather, J. A. and Koenning, S. R. 2006. Estimates of disease effects on soybean yields in the United States 2003 to 2005. J. Nematol. 38:173180.Google ScholarPubMed
Wrather, J. A., Koenning, S. R., and Anderson, T. R. 2003. Effect of diseases on soybean yields in the United States and Ontario (1999–2002). Plant Health Progress. http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/php/default.asp. Accessed February 2, 2007.Google Scholar