Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T00:40:26.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cultivation Tool Design: Design and Construction of Two Novel Cultivation Tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Glenn J. Evans*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Robin R. Bellinder
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Russell R. Hahn
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: gje2@cornell.edu.

Abstract

Cultivation tools have a long history of use. The integration of cultivation within current organic and conventional weed management programs is conditional on the availability of functional, practical cultivation tools. However, there are performance and operational limitations with current cultivation tools. Serviceable improvement in weed control is the impetus behind creation of new tool designs. The primary objective of this research was to design and construct two cultivators that might address the limitations of current cultivation tools. A secondary objective was to identify historical influences on the technology, availability, and capability of cultivation tools. Two new tractor-mounted cultivators were designed and constructed as loose extractions of antique handheld tools. The first tool, a block cultivator, has a flat surface in the front of the tool that rests against the soil and limits the entrance of a rear-mounted blade. The second tool resembles a stirrup hoe, where a horizontal steel blade with a beveled front edge slices through the upper layer of the soil. Block and stirrup cultivator units were mounted on a toolbar with a traditional S-tine sweep, so that the novel cultivators could be compared directly with a common standard. Relative to the S-tine sweep, the stirrup cultivator reduced weed survival by about one-third and the block cultivator reduced weed survival by greater than two-thirds. Of the three tools, block cultivator performance was least influenced by environmental and operational variances.

Las herramientas de cultivo tienen una larga historia de uso. La integración de labores de labranza en programas orgánicos actuales y de manejo convencional de malezas está condicionada a la disponibilidad de herramientas de cultivo funcionales y prácticas. Sin embargo, existen limitaciones de desempeño y operacionales con las herramientas de cultivo actuales. El mejoramiento duradero en el control de malezas es el ímpetu detrás de la creación de nuevos diseños de herramientas. El objetivo principal de esta investigación fue diseñar y construir dos cultivadoras que puedan enfrentar las limitaciones de las actuales herramientas de cultivo. El objetivo secundario fue identificar las influencias históricas en la tecnología, disponibilidad y capacidad de las herramientas. Las dos nuevas cultivadoras para montar en un tractor fueron diseñadas y fabricadas como herramientas similares a las antiguas de uso manual. La primera herramienta, una cultivadora de bloque, tiene una superficie plana en el frente de la herramienta, la cual se apoya contra el suelo y limita la entrada de una cuchilla montada en la parte trasera. La segunda se parece a un azadón de estribo con una cuchilla horizontal de acero que tiene una orilla frontal biselada que rebana la capa superior del suelo. La cultivadora de bloque y de estribo fueron montadas en una barra junto con una cultivadora tradicional, de tal manera que las cultivadoras nuevas pudieran ser comparadas directamente con un estándar común. En relación a la cultivadora tradicional, la cultivadora de estribo redujo la supervivencia de las malezas por cerca de un tercio y la cultivadora de bloque redujo la supervivencia de las malezas por más de dos tercios. De las tres herramientas, el desempeño de la cultivadora de bloque fue el menos influenciado por las variables ambientales y operacionales.

Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Blandford, P. W. 1976. Old Farm Tools and Machinery. Fort Lauderdale, FL Gale Research. Pp. 86112.Google Scholar
Bowman, G., ed. 1997. Steel in the Field: A Farmer's Guide to Weed Management Tools. Beltsville, MD Sustainable Agriculture Network. 128 p.Google Scholar
Currie, B. W. 1916. The Tractor and Its Influence upon the Agricultural Implement Industry. Philadelphia, PA Curtis. 228 p.Google Scholar
Evans, G. J., Bellinder, R. R., and Hahn, R. R. 2012. An evaluation of two novel cultivation tools. Weed Technol. 26:316325.Google Scholar
Ganzel, B. 2003. Tractors in the 1930's. http://www.livinghistoryfarm.org/farminginthe30s/machines_04.html. Accessed: August 9, 2009.Google Scholar
Gianessi, L. P. and Reigner, N. P. 2007. The value of herbicides in U.S. crop production. Weed Technol. 21:559566.Google Scholar
Gittins, B. S. 1959. Land of Plenty. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL Farm Equipment Inst. 63 p.Google Scholar
John, V. 1973. Vintage Farm Machines. Aylesbury, United Kingdom Shire Publications. Pp. 326.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. C. 1976. Farm Inventions in the Making of America. Des Moines, IA Wallace-Homestead. Pp. 839.Google Scholar
LeBaron, H. M., McFarland, J. E., and Burnside, O. 2008. The Triazine Herbicides. Maryland Heights, MO Elsevier. 68 p.Google Scholar
Leichtle, K. E. 1995. Power in the heartland: tractor manufacturers in the midwest. Agricultural Hist. 69:314325.Google Scholar
Morgan, E. B. and inventor, . 1903 Dec 15. Weeding hoe. U.S. patent 747,206.Google Scholar
Noyes, W. 1910. Handwork in Wood. Peoria, IL Manual Arts Press. 224 p.Google Scholar
Oakland, M. and inventor, . 1928 Sep 4. Cultivating implement. U.S. patent 1,683,395.Google Scholar
Rumeley, E. A. 1910. The passing of the man with the hoe. Pages 1324613258. In Page, W., ed. The World's Work: A History of Our Time. Garden City, NY Doubleday, Page, and Co.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2009. Farms and land in farms—final estimates 2003–2007. Statistical Bulletin No. 1018. 24 p.Google Scholar
Timmons, F. L. 1970. A history of weed control in the United States and Canada. Weed Sci. 18:294307.Google Scholar
Wendel, C. H. 2004. Encyclopedia of American Farm Implements and Antiques. 2nd ed. Iola, WI Krause. 94 p.Google Scholar