Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-18T10:41:00.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cover crop response to residual herbicides in peanut-cotton rotation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2020

Katilyn J. Price ,
Xiao Li Open the ORCID record for Xiao Li [Opens in a new window]  and
Andrew Price
Katilyn J. Price
Affiliation:
Research Associate, Department of Crop Soil and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
Xiao Li*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Crop Soil and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
Andrew Price
Affiliation:
Plant Physiologist, National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Auburn, AL, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Xiao Li, 201 Funchess Hall, Auburn University, Auburn, AL36849. Email: steveli@auburn.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cover crops can provide many benefits to peanut and cotton crops planted in rotation including suppressing weeds, conserving soil moisture after termination, increasing soil organic matter, and reducing soil erosion. However, herbicide carryover can affect cover crop establishment. The objective of this study was to investigate the responses of 6 cover crops (daikon radish, cereal rye, oat, crimson clover, winter wheat, and common vetch) to 12 soil residual herbicides. A multiyear (2016–2018), multilocation study was conducted in Macon and Henry counties, Alabama. Herbicide treatments included S-metolachlor, acetochlor, pyroxasulfone, diclosulam, imazapic, chlorimuron-ethyl, bentazon plus acifluorfen, pyrithiobac-sodium, trifloxysulfuron-sodium, diuron, prometryn, and flumioxazin, each applied at 10% of the full-labeled rate. At 42 to 52 and 145 to 149 d after planting (DAP), cover crop plant heights and stand counts were evaluated, as was biomass at 145 to 149 DAP. Treatments varied from year to year but not locations. In 2016, significant stand reductions (P ≤ 0.10) of 36% to 43% in rye and 44% to 75% in wheat were observed at 48 to 52 DAP for S-metolachlor, acetochlor, pyroxasulfone, imazapic, and bentazon plus acifluorfen compared with nontreated plants. Vetch had stand reductions ranging from 14% to 80% for all treatments 50 DAP except for plants treated with prometryn. S-metolachlor, pyroxasulfone, and acetochlor reduced stands of rye, wheat, and vetch more than any other herbicides. In 2017, at 147 to 149 DAP, clover stands were reduced by 29% with diclosulam and by 38% with trifloxysulfuron-sodium. Similarly, radish stands were reduced by 64% with diclosulam treatment. No significant biomass reductions were observed for any cover crop species either year. Oat showed the most tolerance with no treatments reducing any growth parameters either year. Although initial injury and stunting may occur, biomass at termination of cover crops were not affected by herbicide residues evaluated in this study.

Keywords

Biomassestablishmentherbicide carryoverstand reductionAcetochloracifluorfenbentazonchlorimuron-ethyldiclosulamdiuronflumioxazinimazapicprometrynpyroxasulfonepyrithiobac-sodiumS-metolachlortrifloxysulfuron-sodiumcereal ryeSecale cereal L.common vetchVicia villosa L.cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.crimson clover, Trifolium incarnatum L.daikon radish, Raphanus sativis L.oat, Avena sativa L.peanut, Arachis hypogaea L.winter wheat, Triticum aestivum L.
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , August 2020 , pp. 534 - 539
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Lawrence E. Steckel, University of Tennessee

References

Anderson, MJ (2014) Interactions between cover crops and weed management in Iowa’s conventional cropping systems. Master’s Thesis 14087. 72 pGoogle Scholar
Aulakh, JS, Price, AJ, Balkcom, KP (2011) Weed management and cotton yield under two row spacings in conventional and conservation tillage systems utilizing conventional, glufosinate, and glyphosate-based weed management systems. Weed Technol 25:542–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, K, Hoorman, R, Ellis, C, Shannon, K, Broz, B (2016) The effects of corn herbicide carryover on Missouri cover crops:cover crop integration. Columbia: University of Missouri Extension. http://crops.missouri.edu/covercrops/cornherbicide.pdf. Accessed: Febuary 23, 2019Google Scholar
Bryan, M (2014) Field crops research: herbicide carryover injury to cover crops. Practical Farmers of Iowa pp1-3. https://practicalfarmers.org/research/herbicide-carryover-injury-cover-crops Accessed: Febuary 23, 2019Google Scholar
Clark, A (2007) Managing cover crops profitably.Page 212 in Sustainable Agriculture Network Handbook Series 9. Beltsville, MD: Sustainable Agriculture NetworkGoogle Scholar
Claassen, R, Bowman, M, Mcfadden, J, Smith, D, Wallander, S (2018) Tillage intensity and conservation cropping in the United States. Econominc Information Bulletin 197. Beltsville, MD: U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Srvice. 27 pGoogle Scholar
Cornelius, CD, Bradley, KW (2017) Carryover of common corn and soybean herbicides to various cover crop species. Weed Technol 31:21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, WS, Lingenfelter, DD, Garling, L, Wagoner, P (2006) Cover crops for conservation tillage systems. University Park, PA: Penn State Cooperate Extension. https://extension.psu.edu/cover-crops-for-conservation-tillage-systems. Accessed: Febuary 23, 2019Google Scholar
Dabney, SM, Delgado, JA, Reeves, DW (2001) Using winter cover crops to improve soil and water quality. Soil Sci Plant Anal 32:221–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartzler, B, Anderson, M (2015) Effect of residual herbicides on cover crop establishment. Ames: Iowa State Extension and Outreach. https://crops.extension.iastate.edu/effect-residual-herbicides-cover-crop-establishment. Accessed: Febuary 23, 2019Google Scholar
Kasper, TC, Singer, JW (2011) The use of cover crops to manage soil. Pages 321–337 in Hatfield, JL and Sauer, TJ, eds. Soil management: building a stable base for agriculture. American Madison, WI: Society of AgronomyGoogle Scholar
Lu, Y, Watkins, K, Teasdale, J, Abdul-Baki, A (2000) Cover crops in sustainable food production, Food Rev Int 16:121–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palhano, MG, Norsworthy, JK, Barber, T (2018) Sensitivity and likelihood of residual herbicide carryover to cover crops. Weed Technol 32:236–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, AJ, Norsworthy, JK (2013) Cover crops for weed management in southern reduced-tillage vegetable cropping systems. Weed Technol 27:212–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, DW, Price, AJ, Patterson, MG (2005) Evaluation of three winter cereals for weed control in conservation-tillage nontransgenic cotton. Weed Technol 19:731–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reberg-Horton, SC, Grossman, JM, Kornecki, TS, Meijer, AD, Price, AJ, Place, GT, Webster, TM (2011) Utilizing cover crop mulches to reduce tillage in organic systems in the southeastern USA. Renew Agr Food Syst 27:41–48Google Scholar
Rogers, BC, Talbert, R, Frans, R (1986) Effect of cotton (Gossypium birsutum) herbicide carryover on subsequent crops. Weed Sci 34:756–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SARE CTIC (2017) Annual report 2016–2017 cover crop survey. Joint Publication: Conserv Technol Inf Center, North Cent Reg Sustain Agric Res Educ Program, Am Seed Trade Assoc. https://www.sare.org/Learning-Center/From-the-Field/North-Central-SARE-From-the-Field/2017-Cover-Crop-Survey-Analysis. Accessed: February 23, 2019. 46 pGoogle Scholar
Stahl, L (2016) Managing risk when using herbicides and cover crops in corn and soybean. Commodity Crops and Soil Health. St. Paul: University of Minnesota Extension Publication. https://extension.umn.edu/herbicides/managing-risk-when-using-herbicides-and-cover-crops-corn-and-soybean. Accessed: February 27, 2019Google Scholar
Tharp, BE, Kells, JJ (2000) Effect of soil applied herbicides on establishment of cover crop species. Weed Technol 14:596–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, L, Van Eerd, LL, O’Halloran, I, Sikkema, PH, Robinson, DE (2015) Response of four fall-seeded cover crops to residues of selected herbicides. Crop Prot 75:11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar