Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T21:34:14.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of Several Perennial Weeds in Creeping Red Fescue (Festuca rubra) Grown for Seed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. Lloyd Darwent
Affiliation:
Agric. and Agri-Food Can., North. Agric. Res. Cent., Beaverlodge, AB T0H 0C0
Leonard P. Lefkovitch
Affiliation:
Agric. and Agri-Food Can., Bldg. 54, Central Exp. Farm, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6

Abstract

In commercial fields of creeping red fescue, spring applications of sethoxydim at 500 g/ha and fluazifop-P at 250 g/ha consistently reduced the heading, and consequently the seed production, of foxtail barley and volunteer bromegrass by ≥90% without affecting crop seed yield, 100-seed wt or germination. The effectiveness of sethoxydim at 500 g/ha and fluazifop-P at 250 g/ha to reduce heading of grass weeds was not affected by tank mixing with metsulfuron at 4.5 g/ha but was reduced when tank mixed with either dicamba plus 2,4-D at 280 plus 560 g/ha or 2,4-D alone at 560 g/ha. Metsulfuron alone, or in tank mixtures with sethoxydim (500 g/ha) or fluazifop-P (250 g/ha), effectively controlled dandelion and volunteer alsike clover (probability of ≥80% control was 0.94 or more). Dicamba plus 2,4-D provided a similar level of volunteer alsike clover control but was less effective on dandelion, while 2,4-D was ineffective on both weeds. Treatments containing dicamba plus 2,4-D reduced crop seed yield and germination, and increased seed weight.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alberta Agriculture. 1981. Alberta Forage Manual. Alberta Agric. 120/20–4. 87 p.Google Scholar
2. Blackshaw, R. E., Derksen, D. A., and Henning-Muendal, H. 1990. Herbicide combinations for postemergent control in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius). Weed Technol. 4:97104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Blackshaw, R. E. and Harker, K. N. 1992. Combined postemergence grass and broadleaf weed control in canola (Brassica napus). Weed Technol. 6:892897.Google Scholar
4. Brinkman, B. A. and Arnold, W. E. 1972. The phytotoxicity of dicamba to corn and broadleaf weeds when applied with additives. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 27:21.Google Scholar
5. British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1994. Field Crop Guide to Weed, Disease, Insect, Bird and Rodent Control for Commercial Growers. B.C. Min. of Agric., Fish. and Food, Victoria, B.C. 292 p.Google Scholar
6. Canada Department of Agriculture. 1979. Methods and Procedures of Seed Testing. Can. Dep. Agric., Ottawa, ON. 127 p.Google Scholar
7. Chow, P.N.P. 1983. Herbicide mixtures containing BAS 9052 for weed control in flax (Linum usitatissimum). Weed Sci. 81:2022.Google Scholar
8. Darwent, A. L. and Smith, J. H. 1984. Control of broadleaved weeds in creeping red fescue grown for seed. Can. J. Plant Sci. 64:951960.Google Scholar
9. Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:163.Google Scholar
10. Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1990. GENSTAT—a generalized statistical program. The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd., Oxford, U.K. Google Scholar
11. Lefkovitch, L. P. 1991. Analysis of rating scale data. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71:571573.Google Scholar
12. McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A. 1989. Generalized Linear Models. Chapman and Hall, London, U.K. 409 p.Google Scholar
13. Shaffeek, A. 1994. Crop Protection with Chemicals—1994. Alberta Agric. Agdex 606–1.269 p.Google Scholar
14. Strand, O. E. and Lueschen, W. E. 1972. Effect of surfactants on the phytotoxicity and selectivity of 2,4-D sprays in oats. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 27:4243.Google Scholar