Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:09:06.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Combined Postemergence Grass and Broadleaf Weed Control in Canola (Brassica napus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert E. Blackshaw  and
K. Neil Harker
Robert E. Blackshaw
Affiliation:
Agric. Can. Res. Stn., Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1
K. Neil Harker
Affiliation:
Lacombe, AB T0C 1S0
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to study the interaction of sethoxydim or fluazifop-P with clopyralid and/or ethametsulfuron applied as tank mixtures to canola. Control of the indicator species barley, broadbean, and wild mustard with the tank mixtures was comparable to, or sometimes better than, that attained with each herbicide alone. Canola tolerated all herbicides applied individually and all tank mixtures of these herbicides except fluazifop-P and ethametsulfuron. Tank mixtures of fluazifop-P and ethametsulfuron, with or without clopyralid included in the mixture, suppressed early growth of canola in two of four tests and reduced seed yield in one. Sethoxydim, clopyralid, and ethametsulfuron combined in tank mixtures provide an effective POST alternative for selective control of grass and broadleaf weeds in canola.

Keywords

Clopyralid, 3,6-dichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acidethametsulfuron, 2-[[[[[4-ethoxy-6-(methylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidfluazifop-P, (R)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidsethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onebarley, Hordeum vulgare L. ‘Galt’canola, Brassica napus L. ‘Westar’broadbean, Vicia faba L. ‘Ackerperle’wild mustard, Brassica kaber (DC.) L. C. Wheeler # SINARHerbicide interactiontank mixturescrop toleranceseed yieldoilseed rapeBrassica kaberHordeum vulgareVicia fabaSINAR
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 892 - 897
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alberta Agriculture. 1991. Guide to crop protection in Alberta. Agdex 606-1, 7000-113 St., Edmonton, AB. p. 4–114.Google Scholar
2. Blackshaw, R. E. 1989. Control of Cruciferae weeds in canola (Brassica napus) with DPX A7881. Weed Sci. 37:706–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Blackshaw, R. E. 1989. Synergistic mixes of DPX-A7881 and clopyralid in canola (Brassica napus). Weed Technol. 3:690–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Buchanan, F. S., Swanton, C. J., and Gillespie, T. J. 1990. POST control of weeds in winter rapeseed, Brassica napus, with DPX-A7881. Weed Sci. 38:389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Brewster, B. D. and Spinney, R. L. 1989. Control of seedling grasses with POST grass herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:39–43.Google Scholar
6. Chow, P.N.P., O'Sullivan, P. A., Hunter, J. H., and Kirkland, K. J. 1983. Control of barley and wheat in canola with BAS 9052. Can. J. Plant Sci. 63:1099–1102.Google Scholar
7. Harker, K. N. 1987. Grassy weed control in canola with graminicide and DPX A7881 mixtures. Res. Rep. Expert Comm. Weeds (West. Sect.) p. 291–292.Google Scholar
8. Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:1–63.Google Scholar
9. Kirkland, K. J. 1989. Tolerance of canola varieties to postemergent graminicides. Res. Rep. Expert Comm. Weeds (West. Sect.) p. 275–276.Google Scholar
10. O'Sullivan, P. A. and Kossatz, V. C. 1982. Selective control of Canada thistle in rapeseed with 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:989–993.Google Scholar
11. O'Sullivan, P. A. and Kossatz, V. C. 1984. Control of Canada thistle and tolerance of barley to 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid. Can. J. Plant Sci. 64:215–217.Google Scholar
12. Parsons, I. M. 1987. Use of DPX-A7881 for weed control in spring oilseed rape in Canada. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.-Weeds 3:809–814.Google Scholar
13. Rose, S. P. and Bell, J. M. 1982. Reproduction of mice fed low erucic acid rapeseed oil contaminated with weed seed oils. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 62:617–624.Google Scholar
14. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. p. 177–181.Google Scholar
15. Swanton, C. J. and Chandler, K. 1989. Control of wild mustard in canola with POST herbicides. Can. J. Plant Sci. 69:889–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Thomas, P. 1984. Weeds, insects and diseases of canola. p. 1001–1064 in Canola Growers Manual. Canola Counc. Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba.Google Scholar