Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T17:16:13.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Broadleaf Weed Control in Winter-Sown Lentil (Lens culinaris)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Hassan Karimmojeni
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
Ali Reza Yousefi*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
Per Kudsk
Affiliation:
Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Flakkebjerg, DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark
Amir Hossein Bazrafshan
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: yousefi.alireza@znu.ac.ir.

Abstract

Winter sowing of lentil results in higher yields than a spring-sown crop. However, when lentil is winter-sown, the critical period of weed control is extended and might require sequential herbicide management strategies to obtain maximum yields. The efficacy of POST alone or soil applied followed by (fb) POST herbicides or hand weeding were evaluated in 2002 and 2003. Trifluralin (PPI) or pendimethalin (PRE) were applied at planting, and pyridate or oxyfluorfen were applied POST at the three- to four-leaf stage of lentil. The lowest level of weed biomass was recorded with all treatments, except pyridate alone in both years, pendimethalin PRE fb pyridate in 2002, and oxyfluorfen in 2003. Application of pyridate or oxyfluorfen POST alone resulted in lower yields. In 2002, trifluralin PPI or pendimethalin PRE fb one hand weeding or pendimethalin fb pyridate resulted in yields similar to the weed-free treatment. In 2003, yields were similar to the weed-free treatment, except pyridate or oxyfluorfen alone and trifluralin PPI fb oxyfluorfen. Weed species observed in the present study required sequential management to achieve both effective control and maximum lentil yield.

La siembra en invierno de lenteja resulta en mayores rendimientos que la siembra en la primavera. Sin embargo, cuando se produce lenteja en el invierno, el período crítico para el control de malezas es más largo y puede requerir estrategias de manejo con aplicaciones secuenciales de herbicidas para obtener rendimientos máximos. En 2002 y 2003, se evaluó la eficacia de herbicidas POST aplicados solos, de herbicidas aplicados al suelo seguidos (fb) de herbicidas POST, y de deshierba manual. Trifluralin (PPI) o pendimethalin (PRE) fueron aplicados a la siembra, y pyridate u oxyfluorfen fueron aplicados POST en los estadios de desarrollo de tres a cuatro hojas de la lenteja. La menor biomasa de malezas se registró con todos los tratamientos, excepto pyridate solo, en ambos años, pendimethalin PRE fb pyridate en 2002, y oxyfluorfen en 2003. La aplicación POST de pyridate u oxyfluorfen solos resultó en rendimientos más bajos. En 2002, trifluralin PPI o pendimethalin PRE fb deshierba manual o pendimethalin fb pyridate resultó en rendimientos similares al testigo libre de malezas. En 2003, los rendimientos fueron similares al testigo libre de malezas, excepto por pyridate u oxyfluorfen solos y trifluralin PPI fb oxyfluorfen. Las especies de malezas que se observaron en el presente estudio requirieron un manejo secuencial para alcanzar un control efectivo y un rendimiento máximo de la lenteja.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahmad, SS, Abid, A, Cheema, ZA, Tanveer, A (1996) Study of various chemical weed control practices in lentil. J Agric Res 34:127134 Google Scholar
Alizadeh, HM, Karimmojeni, H, Majnoon Hosseini, N (2004) Integrated weed control methods in winter and spring sown lentil. Page 61 in Proceedings of the 6th Workshop of the EWRS Working Groups: Physical and Cultural Weed Control. Lillehammer, Norway: European Weed Research Society. [Abstract]Google Scholar
Ball, DA, Ogg, AG, Chevalier, PM (1997) The influence of seeding rate on weed control in small-red lentil (Lens culinaris). Weed Sci 45:296300 Google Scholar
Benvenuti, S, Macchia, M (1993) Calculation of threshold temperature for the development of various weeds. Agric Med 123:252256 Google Scholar
Chaudhary, SU, Iqbal, J, Hussain, M, Wajid, A (2011) Economical weed control in lentil crop. J Anim Plant Sci 21:734737 Google Scholar
Elkola, E, Kantar, F, Zengin, H (2004) Effects of chemical and agronomic weed control treatments on weed density, yield and yield parameters of lentil (Lens culinaris Cv. Erzurum-89). Asian J Plant Sci 2:187192 Google Scholar
Erman, M, Tepe, I, Bukun, B, Yergin, R, Taskesen, M (2008) Critical period of weed control in winter sown lentil under non-irrigated conditions in Turkey. Afr J Agric Res 8:523530 Google Scholar
Erskine, W, Muehlbauer, F, Sarker, A, Sharma, B, eds (2009) The Lentil: Botany, Production and Uses. Oxfordshire, UK: CABI. 457 pGoogle Scholar
FAOSTAT (2010) Agriculture Data. http://www.faostat.fao.org. Accessed October 20, 2010.Google Scholar
Fedoruk, LK, Johnson, EN, Shirtliffe, SJ (2011) The critical period of weed control for lentil in Western Canada. Weed Sci 59:517526 Google Scholar
Kayan, N, Adak, MS (2006) Effect of soil tillage and weed control methods on weed biomass and yield of lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.). Arch Agron Soil Sci 52:697704 Google Scholar
Masin, R, Loddo, D, Benvenuti, S, Zuin, MC, Macchia, M, Zanin, G (2010) Temperature and water potential as parameters for modeling weed emergence in central-northern Italy. Weed Sci 58:216222 Google Scholar
Mohamed, ES, Nourai, AH, Mohamed, GE, Mohamed, MI, Saxen, MC (1997) Weeds and weed management in irrigated lentil in Northern Sudan. Weed Res 37:211218 Google Scholar
Monaco, TJ, Weller, SC, Ashton, FM, eds (2002) Weed Science: Principles and Practices. 4th edn. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 671 pGoogle Scholar
Moskova, C (2013). Morphological and biological characteristics of species from the Amaranthus genus. Sci Pap Ser A Agron LVI:498499 Google Scholar
Muehlbauer, FJ, Kaiser, WJ, Clement, SL, Summerfield, RJ (1995) Production and breeding of lentil. Adv Agron 54:283332 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Oliveira, MJ (2007) A model for predicting common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) emergence in soybean. Weed Sci 55:341345 Google Scholar
Sadiq, M, Jamil, M, Mehdi, SM, Sarfraz, M, Gondal, MR, Hassan, G (2002) Effect of various weedicides on weed control and yield of lentil (Lens cullinaris) crop in salt affected soil. Asian J Plant Sci 3:275276 Google Scholar
Singh, S, Sinha, KK, Mishra, SS, Pandey, IS, Sinha, SS (1992) Effect of inoculation, nitrogen and weed management on lentil (Lens culinaris). Indian J Agron 37:115118 Google Scholar
Smitchger, JA, Burke, CI, Yenish, JP (2012) The critical period of weed control in lentil (Lens culinaris) in the Pacific Northwest. Weed Sci 60:8185 Google Scholar
Taab, RA, Alizadeh, HM (2004) Economics of weed control in lentils. Page 42 in Proceedings of the 4th International Weed Science Congress. Durban, South Africa: International Weed Science society. [Abstract]Google Scholar
Tepe, I, Erman, M, Yazlik, A, Levent, R, Upek, K (2004) Effect of different control methods on weeds, yield components and nodulation in the spring lentil. Turk J Agric For 28:4956 Google Scholar
Yousefi, AR, Alizadeh, HM, Rahimian, H (2007) Broadleaf weed control in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) with pre-and post-emergence herbicides. Res Crops 8:560564 Google Scholar