Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T17:47:27.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bensulfuron and Halosulfuron Alter Clomazone Activity on Rice (Oryza sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Eric P. Webster ,
Christopher R. Mudge ,
Wei Zhang  and
David C. Blouin
Eric P. Webster*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management, 104 Sturgis Hall, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Christopher R. Mudge
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management, 104 Sturgis Hall, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Wei Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management, 104 Sturgis Hall, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
David C. Blouin
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Statistics, 45 Agriculture Administration Building, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: ewebster@agcenter.lsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A laboratory study was conducted in 2003 at Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge, LA, to evaluate the interactive effects of bensulfuron or halosulfuron on clomazone in terms of rice foliar bleaching and chlorophyll content. Clomazone was applied alone at 0 and 1.227 μg/ml (672 g/ha) or in combination with bensulfuron at 0.0276 μg ai/ml (42 g ai/ha) or halosulfuron at 0.0345 μg ai/ml (53 g ai/ha) in a hydroponic solution. Bensulfuron and halosulfuron were also applied alone. Rice cultivars evaluated included short-grain ‘Pirogue’, medium-grain ‘Bengal’, and long-grain ‘Cocodrie’. Bensulfuron and halosulfuron, applied in a hydroponic solution, safened medium-grain Bengal, long-grain Cocodrie, and short-grain Pirogue at 21 d after treatment (DAT) from foliar bleaching caused by clomazone. Chlorophyll a and b and total chlorophyll content of all three rice cultivars decreased when treated with clomazone treatment. Only chlorophyll content of Cocodrie was increased by the addition of bensulfuron and halosulfuron compared with a single application of clomazone.

Keywords

Clomazonebensulfuronhalosulfuronrice, Oryza sativa L., ‘Cocodrie’, ‘Bengal’, and ‘Pirogue’antagonismsafeningsynergismALS, acetolactate synthaseDAT, days after treatment
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 2006 , pp. 520 - 525
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: P.O. Box 110500, 304 Newell Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611.

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H. ed. 1994. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. Pp 28–30.Google Scholar
Arnon, D. I. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris . Plant Physiol. 24:1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrentine, W. L., Edwards, C. J., and Hartwig, E. E. 1976. Screening soybeans for tolerance to metribuzin. Agron. J. 68:351–353.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. and Esau, R. 1991. Control of annual broadleaf weeds in pinto beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technol. 5:532–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blouin, D. C., Webster, E. P., and Zhang, W. 2004. Analysis of synergistic and antagonistic effects of herbicides using nonlinear mixed-models methodology. Weed Technol. 18:464–472.Google Scholar
Carmer, S. G., Nyquist, W. E., and Walker, W. M. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analysis of experiments with two or three-factor treatment designs. Agron. J. 81:665–672.Google Scholar
Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., York, A. C., Marth, J. L., and Corbin, F. T. 2001. Effect of insecticides on clomazone absorption, translocation, and metabolism in cotton. Weed Sci. 49:613–616.Google Scholar
Duke, S. O. and Kenyon, W. H. 1986. Effects of dimethazone (FMC-57020) on chloroplast development. I. Pigment synthesis and photosynthetic function in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) primary leaves. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 25:11–18.Google Scholar
Duke, S. O., Kenyon, W. H., and Paul, R. N. 1985. FMC 57020 effects on chloroplast development in pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) cotyledons. Weed Sci. 33:786–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, S. O. and Paul, R. N. 1986. Effects of dimethazone (FMC-57020) on chloroplast development. II. Ultrastructural effects in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) primary leaves. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 25:1–10.Google Scholar
Duke, S. O., Paul, R. N., Becerril, J. M., and Schmidt, J. H. 1991. Clomazone causes accumulation of sesquiterpenoids in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L). Weed Sci. 39:339–346.Google Scholar
Hager, A. G., Wax, L. M., Bollero, G. A., and Stoller, E. W. 2003. Influence of diphenylether herbicide application rate and timing on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 17:14–20.Google Scholar
Liebl, R. A. and Norman, M. A. 1991. Mechanism of clomazone selectivity in corn (Zea mays), soybean (Glycine max), smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 39:329–332.Google Scholar
Mudge, C. R., Webster, E. P., Zhang, W., Leon, C. T., and Griffin, R. M. 2004. Londax and Permit: potential safeners for command in water seeded rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 57:59.Google Scholar
Newsom, L. J. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Soybean (Glycine max) cultivar tolerance to chlorimuron and imazaquin with varying hydroponic solution pH. Weed Technol. 6:382–388.Google Scholar
Norman, M. A., Liebl, R. A., and Widholm, J. M. 1990a. Uptake and metabolism of clomazone in tolerant-soybean and susceptible-cotton photomixotrophic cell suspension cultures. Plant Physiol. 92:772–784.Google Scholar
Norman, M. A., Liebl, R. A., and Widholm, J. M. 1990b. Site of clomazone action in tolerant-soybean and susceptible-cotton photomixotrophic cell suspense cultures. Plant Physiol. 92:772–782.Google Scholar
Salzman, F. P., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1992. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of clomazone, metribuzin and linuron in soybean (Glycine max) and common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium). Weed Sci. 40:395–401.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 2002. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 9. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. Pp. 2083–2226.Google Scholar
Scherder, E. F., Talbert, R. E., Schmidt, L. A., and Lovelace, M. L. 2000. Tolerance of various rice cultivars to clomazone. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:20.Google Scholar
Schloss, J. V., Ciskanik, L. M., and Van Dyk, D. E. 1988. Origin of the herbicide binding site of acetolactate synthase. Nature 331:360–362.Google Scholar
Scott, J. E. and Weston, L. A. 1992. Cole crop (Brassica oleracea) tolerance to clomazone. Weed Sci. 40:7–11.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P. 2003. Changes in water-seeded rice weed management. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 56:364.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P., Lanclos, D. Y., and Zhang, W. 2003. Influence of glufosinate on seed weight, seed germination, and seedling vigor of glufosinate-resistant rice. Weed Technol. 17:51–54.Google Scholar
Weimer, M. R., Balke, N. E., and Buhler, D. D. 1992. Absorption and metabolism of clomazone by suspension-cultured cells of soybean and velvetleaf. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 42:43–53.Google Scholar
Weimer, M. R., Buhler, D. D., and Balke, N. E. 1991. Clomazone selectivity: absence of differential uptake, translocation, or detoxication. Weed Sci. 39:529–534.Google Scholar
Weston, L. A. and Barrett, M. 1989. Tolerance of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and bell pepper (Capsicum annum) to clomazone. Weed Sci. 37:285–289.Google Scholar
Wixson, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Differential response of soybean (Glycine max) cultivars to AC 263,222. Weed Technol. 5:430–433.Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Webster, E. P., and Blouin, D. C. 2005. Response of rice and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) to rates and timings of clomazone. Weed Technol. 19:528–531.Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Webster, E. P., Blouin, D. C., and Linscombe, S. D. 2004. Differential tolerance of rice cultivars to clomazone in dry-seeded culture. Weed Technol. 18:73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar