Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:02:52.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of Florpyrauxifen-benzyl Potential to Carryover to Subsequent Crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2018

M. Ryan Miller  and
Jason K. Norsworthy
M. Ryan Miller*
Affiliation:
Former Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
Jason K. Norsworthy
Affiliation:
Professor and Elms Farming Chair of Weed Science, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
*
Author for correspondence: M. Ryan Miller, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704. (Email: mrm032@uark.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Florpyrauxifen-benzyl is a new synthetic auxin herbicide that will provide a novel site of action in rice production. In many areas of the United States it is common practice to plant soybeans in rotation with rice, thereby introducing the potential for herbicide carryover. Multiple field experiments were conducted in 2014 and repeated in 2015 to evaluate potential plant-back restrictions for soybean and other row crops following an application of florpyrauxifen-benzyl. In the first experiment, treatments comprised florpyrauxifen-benzyl applied at 40 followed by 40 g ai ha–1, 80 fb 80 g ai ha–1, and a nontreated check. In 2014, herbicides were applied to a silt loam soil near Stuttgart and Colt, AR, and fields remained fallow following application. The following year, corn, cotton, soybean, grain sorghum, and sunflower were planted within the previously treated area. Stand counts, crop heights, and visual injury assessments were done for each crop following planting, and aboveground biomass data were collected 28 d after planting. No significant differences were observed among the treatments for any of the parameters assessed, highlighting the rotational flexibility of common row crops 1 yr following a florpyrauxifen-benzyl application. In the second experiment, florpyrauxifen-benzyl was applied at 30 and 60 g ai ha–1 at 56, 28, 14, and 0 d before planting soybean. Injury assessments corresponded to the highest concentration of florpyrauxifen-benzyl and its metabolites recovered from soil at the time of planting. Conversely, soybean injury was reduced when florpyrauxifen-benzyl was applied at increasing intervals before planting. At the end of each season, soybean yield was similar to the nontreated control when florpyrauxifen-benzyl at 30 or 60 g ai ha–1 was applied 56 d before planting, whereas all other treatments reduced yield. These results support a relatively short replant interval for soybean after florpyrauxifen-benzyl application to rice.

Keywords

Daniel Stephenson, Louisiana State University Agricultural CenterFlorpyrauxifen-benzylcorn, Zea mays L.cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor L.rice, Oryza sativa L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.sunflower, Helianthus annuus L.Auxindegradationplant-backsoil
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , August 2018 , pp. 404 - 409
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous (2017) Newpath herbicide label. BASF Corp. Research Triangle Park, NC. 27709Google Scholar
Barber, LT, Norsworthy, JK, Scott, B (2014) Row crop plant-back intervals for common herbicides. University of Arkansas, Cooperative Extension Service MP519. http://www.arkansas-crops.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/MP519.pdf Google Scholar
[EPA] Environmental Protection Agency (2005) Environmental fate and ecological risk assessment for the registration of aminopyralid. https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/cleared_reviews/csr_PC-005100_10-May-05_a.pdf. Accessed: November 21, 2017Google Scholar
Epp, JB, Alexander, AL, Balko, TW, Buysse, AM, Brewster, WK, Bryan, K, Daeuble, JF, Fields, SC, Gast, RE, Green, RA, Irvine, NM, Lo, WC, Lowe, CT, Renga, JM, Richburg, JS, Ruiz, JM, Satchivi, NM, Schmitzer, PR, Siddall, TL, Webster, JD, Weimer, MR, Whiteker, GT, Yerkes, CN (2016) The discovery of ArlyexTM active and RinskorTM active: two novel auxin herbicides. J Bioorganic Medicinal Chem 24:362–371 Google Scholar
Grey, TL, Braxton, LB, Richburg, III JS (2012) Effect of wheat herbicide carryover on double-crop cotton and soybean. Weed Technol 26:207–212 Google Scholar
Hardke, JT (2014) Arkansas Rice Production Handbook. University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service. Pp 53–62 Google Scholar
Heap, I (2018) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.com. Accessed: February 3, 2018Google Scholar
Kruger, EL, Rice, PJ, Anhalt, JC, Anderson, TA, Coats, JR (1997) Comparison fates of atrazine and deethylatrazine in sterile and nonsterile soils. J Environ Qual 26:95–101 Google Scholar
Lee, S, Sundaram, S, Armitage, L, Evans, JP, Hawkes, T, Kepinski, S, Ferro, N, Napier, RM (2013) Defining binding efficiency and specificity of auxins for SCFTIR1/AFB-Aux/IAA co-receptor complex formation. ACS Chem Biol 9:673–682 Google Scholar
Marchesan, E, dos Santos, FM, Grohs, M, de Avila, LA, Machado, SLO, Senseman, SA, Massoni, PFS, Satori, GMC (2010) Carryover of imazethapyr and imazapic to nontolerant rice. Weed Technol 24:6–10 Google Scholar
Mikkelson, JR, Lym, RG (2011) Aminopyralid soil residues affect crop rotation in North Dakota soils. Weed Technol 25:422–429 Google Scholar
Mueller, TC, Senseman, SA (2015) Methods related to herbicide dissipation or degradation under field or laboratory conditions. Weed Sci (SI) 63:133–139 Google Scholar
Renner, KA, Schabenberger, O, Kells, JJ (1998) Effect of tillage application method on corn (Zea mays) response to imidazolinone residues in soil. Weed Technol 12:281–285 Google Scholar
Riar, DS, Norsworthy, JK, Steckel, LE, Stephenson, DO, Eubank, TW, Bond, J, Scott, RC (2013) Adoption of best management practices for herbicide-resistant weeds in midsouthern United States cotton, rice, and soybean. Weed Technol 27:788–797 Google Scholar
Vencill, WK (2002) Herbicide Handbook. 8th edition. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America, Allen Press Google Scholar
Walker, A, Welch, SJ (1991) Enhanced degradation of some soil-applied herbicides. Weed Res 31:49–57 Google Scholar
Zhang, W, Webster, EP, Braverman, MP (2002) Rice (Oryza sativa) response to rotational crop and rice herbicide combinations. Weed Technol 16:340–345 Google Scholar