Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T02:21:11.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A System for Morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) Control in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Bryan R. Savoy
Affiliation:
Dep. Soil Crop Sci., Texas A & M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
David L. Holshouser
Affiliation:
Dep. Soil Crop Sci., Texas A & M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
Kenneth L. Smith
Affiliation:
Sandoz Agro, Inc., 706 N. Motley, Overton, TX 75684
James M. Chandler
Affiliation:
Dep. Soil Crop Sci., Texas A & M Univ., College Station, TX 77843

Abstract

Research was conducted to determine an effective morningglory control system for cotton grown in central Texas, Prometryn applied PRE or directed-POST applications of methazole or methazole + MSMA did not always adequately control ivyleaf, entireleaf, and seedling sharppod morningglories. However, adequate control of the above species plus pitted morningglory was achieved with a management system that used a dinitroaniline applied PPI or PRE, prometryn applied PRE (0.9 kg ai ha−1), followed by methazole (0.56 kg ha−1) or methazole + MSMA (0.56 + 1.80 kg ha−1) directed POST to cotton 10 to 15 cm high.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baker, R. S. and Hurst, H. R. 1990. Morningglory control in Mississippi. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Production Res. Conf. p. 361363.Google Scholar
2. Boyles, M. C. 1990. Methazole plus norflurazon applied preemergence in west Texas cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:84.Google Scholar
3. Byrd, J. D. Jr. 1991. Report of the 1990 cotton weed loss committee. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Production Res. Conf. p. 949.Google Scholar
4. Chandler, J. M. and Santelmann, P. W. 1970. Chemical control of several problem annual weeds of cropland. Oklahoma State Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. B-674.Google Scholar
5. Crowley, R. H. and Buchanan, G. A. 1978. Competition of four morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) species with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 26:484488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Dowler, C. C. 1992. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:396.Google Scholar
7. Holshouser, D. L. and Chandler, J. M. 1988. Management systems for morningglories in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:87.Google Scholar
8. Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1991. Influence of MSMA on herbicides applied postemergence directed in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:86.Google Scholar
9. Keeley, P. E., Thullen, R. J., and Carter, C. H. 1986. Influence of planting date on growth of ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 34:906910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Savoy, B. R., Holshouser, D. L., Smith, K. L., and Chandler, J. M. 1992. Systems for morningglory management in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:37.Google Scholar
11. Smith, K. L. and Chandler, J. M. 1989. Methazole in a comprehensive system for morningglory control in cotton. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Production Res. Conf. p. 389.Google Scholar
12. Smith, K. L. and Chandler, J. M. 1991. Effectiveness of norflurazon and prometryn combinations for preemergence control of annual morningglory. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Production Res. Conf. p. 964.Google Scholar