Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T16:55:08.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Management of Fringed Sagebrush (Artemisia frigida) in Saskatchewan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Heather C. Peat  and
Garry G. Bowes
Heather C. Peat
Affiliation:
Agric. Can. Res. Stn., Box 440, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada S4P 3A2
Garry G. Bowes
Affiliation:
Agric. Can. Res. Stn., 107 Science Cres., Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N OX2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fringed sagebrush is a native, drought-resistant, increaser species in Saskatchewan pastures and rangelands. Conventional control by cultivating and reseeding is neither highly effective nor sustainable. Two field experiments were conducted in 1988 and 1989 through 1991 to develop a management plan for fringed sagebrush. Comparison of fringed sagebrush control using various applications of clopyralid, dicamba, dichlorprop, fluroxypyr, picloram, triclopyr and 2,4-D, showed control was sufficient using the low-cost herbicide 2,4-D isooctyl ester at 1.5 kg ai/ha. Total yield of crested wheatgrass plus smooth brome was compared and the plots subjected to two applications of 2,4-D yielded the greatest accumulation of grass over the length of the experiments. The economic threshold of fringed sagebrush is the density at which yield is reduced by approximately 290 kg/ha; above this density it is economically viable to use 2,4-D at 1.5 kg/ha to control fringed sagebrush. Grazing practices can aid greatly in management of fringed sagebrush by allowing the forage to out-compete fringed sagebrush.

Keywords

Clopyralid, 3,6-dichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic aciddicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic aciddichlorprop, (±)-2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)propanoic acidfluroxypyr, [(4-amino-3,5-dichloro-6-fluoro-2-pyridinyl)oxy]acetic acidpicloram, 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acidtriclopyr, [(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)oxy]acetic acid2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acidcrested wheatgrass, Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertnsmooth brome, Bromus inermis Leyssfringed sagebrush, Artemisia frigida Willd. # ARTFREconomic thresholdintegrated weed managementrange managementclopyraliddicambadichlorpropfluroxypyrpicloramtriclopyr2,4-DAgropyron cristatumBromus inermis
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 553 - 558
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bailey, J. A. and Cooperrider, A. Y. 1982. Final report: Trickle Mountain Research Study. U.S. Dep. Inter., Bur. Land Manage., Denver, CO. 137 p.Google Scholar
2. Cooperrider, A. Y. and Bailey, J. A. 1986. Fringed sagebrush (Artemisia frigida)—a neglected forage species of western ranges. p. 46–54 in Proc.—Symposium on the Biology of Artemisia and Chrysothamnus, Provo, Utah, July 9-13, 1984. USDA For. Ser. Intermtn. Res. Stn., Ogden, UT 84401, Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-200.Google Scholar
3. Coupland, R. T. and Johnson, R. E. 1965. Rooting characteristics of native grassland species in Saskatchewan. J. Ecol. 53:475–507.Google Scholar
4. Cousens, R. 1987. Theory and reality of weed control thresholds. Plant Prot. Q., 2:13–20.Google Scholar
5. Ellison, L. 1960. Influence of grazing on plant succession of rangelands. Bot. Rev. 26:2–78.Google Scholar
6. Expert Committee on Weeds. 1991. Expert Committee on Weeds Electronic Data Input User's Manual. Agriculture Canada, Regina, Saskatchewan. p. 36.Google Scholar
7. Johnson, W. M. 1956. The effect of grazing intensity on plant composition, vigor and growth of pine-bunchgrass ranges in Central Colorado. Ecology 37:790–798.Google Scholar
8. Jones, W. B. 1965. Response of major plant species to elk and cattle grazing in Northwestern Wyoming. J. Range Manage. 18:218–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. New Grazing and Technologies Project. 1991. Managing Saskatchewan Rangeland. Saskatchewan Agriculture Development Fund, Regina, Saskatchewan. 118 p.Google Scholar
10. Oliver, L. R. 1988. Principles of weed threshold research. Weed Technol. 2:398–403.Google Scholar
11. Ryerson, D. and Ranney, J. 1977. Fringed sagewort (Artemisia frigida) control in Eastern Montana. Montana Agric. Exp. Stn., Res. Rep. 53. 7 p.Google Scholar
12. SAS Institute Inc. 1989. SAS 6.0. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
13. Saskatchewan Agriculture. 1993. Weed Control Notes. Crop Protection Section of Soils and Crops Branch, Regina, Saskatchewan. 10 p.Google Scholar
14. Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food. 1993. Farm Machinery Custom and Rental Rate Guide. Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food, Regina, Saskatchewan. 31 p.Google Scholar
15. Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food. 1992. Agricultural Statistics 1991. Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food, Regina, Saskatchewan. p. 38.Google Scholar
16. Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food. 1991. Weed Control in Field and Forage Crops. Saskatchewan Agriculture, Regina, Saskatchewan. 133 p.Google Scholar
17. Spang, E. F. 1954. Utilization of fringed sagewort on a winter sheep range. J. Range Manage. 7:73–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. USDA. 1937. Range Plant Handbook. U.S. Dep. Agric., For. Ser., Washington, D.C., U.S. Dep. Agric. Bull. p. 22B–23.Google Scholar
19. Vavra, M., Rice, R. W., Hansen, R. M., and Sims, P. L. 1977. Food habits of cattle on shortgrass range in Northeastern Colorado. J. Range Manage. 30:261–263.Google Scholar
20. Wilson, R. G. and Stubbendieck, J. 1981. Fringed sagebrush (Artemisia frigida) control in Western Nebraska. Weed Sci. 29:525–530.Google Scholar