Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5cfd469876-9knjr Total loading time: 0.515 Render date: 2021-06-25T11:13:55.871Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Under pressure: maternal effects promote drought tolerance in progeny seed of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2020

Maor Matzrafi
Affiliation:
Former Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA; current: Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Research, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya’ar Research Center, Israel
O. Adewale Osipitan
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
Sara Ohadi
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
Mohsen B. Mesgaran
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
Corresponding
E-mail address:
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The environmental conditions under which parental plants are reared can affect the seed characteristics of the progeny. The variation originating from such maternal effects has rarely been incorporated into models of seed germination. Here, using Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson), we examined the effects of water stress during the growth of parental plants on the progeny seed characteristics, including weight, size, final germination, and parameters of a hydrotime germination model. We grew two populations (from California and Kansas) under continuous water-deficit or well-watered conditions. In both A. palmeri populations, progeny seeds originating from water-stressed plants were heavier and larger than those from well-watered plants. Plants exposed to water stress also produced seeds that were ~30% less dormant than seeds from control plants. To test whether the maternal environment affects the parameters of a hydrotime model, progeny seeds were subject to five water potentials (0, −0.2, −0.4, −0.6, and −0.8 MPa) and incubated at 20 and 30 C; germination was monitored daily. The estimated median base water potential (Ψb(50)), that is, the water potential at which 50% of seeds cannot germinate, was consistently lower for seeds from water-stressed plants than for seeds from well-watered plants. Our results showed that A. palmeri plants experiencing drought during their growth produce seeds that are less dormant and can germinate from drier conditions—a maternal response that seems to be adaptive. These findings also call for development of germination models that incorporate the environmental conditions of both the current and past seasons to better describe the variability in germination of weed seeds.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Introduction

Seed germination is highly regulated through environmental cueing (Donohue et al. Reference Donohue, Rubio de Casas, Burghardt, Kovach and Willis2010), and weeds often exhibit high levels of variation in timing and extent of germination (Baskin and Baskin Reference Baskin and Baskin1985; Egley and Williams Reference Egley and William1991; Forcella et al. Reference Forcella, Arnold, Sanchez and Ghersa2000). Variation in seed germination is determined, however, not only by the immediate microenvironment of the seed but also by the conditions experienced by parental plants (mainly maternal; Baskin and Baskin Reference Baskin and Baskin2019) during the preceding growing season (Fenner Reference Fenner1991; Roach and Wulff Reference Roach and Wulff1987). Maternal environment effects on seed germination have been reported for a wide range of plant species in response to temperature (Donohue et al. Reference Donohue, Heschel, Butler, Barua, Sharrock, Whitelam and Chiang2008), soil moisture (Wright et al. Reference Wright, Seavers, Peters and Marshall1999), CO2 (Farnsworth and Bazzaz Reference Farnsworth and Bazzaz1995), daylength (Nurse et al. Reference Nurse, DiTommaso and Ramirez2004), solar irradiance (Adkins and Armstrong Reference Adkins and Armstrong2007), light quality (Van Hinsberg Reference Van Hinsberg1998), nutrients (Allison Reference Allison2002), herbicides (Andersson Reference Andersson1996), competition (Nurse and DiTommaso Reference Nurse and DiTommaso2005), viral infection (Kathiria et al. Reference Kathiria, Sidler, Golubov, Kalischuk, Kawchuk and Kovalchuk2010), and even presence (or absence) of earthworms in the soil (Laossi et al. Reference Laossi, Noguera and Barot2010).

Variability in germination (dormancy) patterns acts as a bet-hedging strategy whereby some weed cohorts can escape control measures or unsuitable environments. Repeated applications (e.g., of herbicides) during the season are often necessary to control the staggered cohorts that result from temporally nonuniform germination patterns. Therefore, understanding what regulates the observed variation in germination patterns not only is a fundamental question in weed seed ecology but also has implications for management of weeds.

Environmental maternal effect adds another layer of complexity to germination studies, as the observed responses to current experimental factors are not independent of seed’s past exposure to different environmental conditions. Maternal effect, therefore, markedly constrains our ability to predict weed seed germination (and seedling emergence), as current germination/emergence models are developed solely using the present microenvironment experienced by the seed. The inconsistencies that we sometimes observe in germination studies are often interpreted as experimental errors but in part may have sound biological underpinnings due to maternal effects.

Interestingly, it seems that seed germination responds to certain maternal environments in a predictable manner. A literature review by Fenner (Reference Fenner1991) showed that high temperatures, short days, red light, drought, and high nitrogen during seed development were consistently associated with increased germinability in the progeny (Fenner Reference Fenner1991). A good example of such predictable changes is an early study by Von Abrams and Hand (Reference Von Abrams and Hand1956) on hybrid roses that found a strong (positive) linear relationship (R2 ≈ 0.99) between the progeny seed germination and the mean average daily temperature 30 d before seed harvest. These observations suggest that the predictive power of germination (emergence) models can be improved by incorporating the information about the environment of the previous growing season. Such “transgenerational models” can be developed by quantifying changes in the attributes of an established model as a function of certain maternal environmental variables (e.g., soil moisture levels in which the mother plants have grown).

In this study, we examined the effects of maternal water environments on properties of the hydrotime model of germination in progeny seeds of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson). Hydrotime models have been successfully used to describe the temporal pattern of germination in response to reduced water in many species, including weeds (Batlla and Benech-Arnold Reference Batlla and Benech-Arnold2004; Bradford Reference Bradford1990; Bradford and Still Reference Bradford and Still2004; Gianinetti and Cohn Reference Gianinetti and Cohn2007; Gummerson Reference Gummerson1986). Specifically, our objective was to quantify potential changes in base water potential, Ψb(g), for seed germination of A. palmeri in response to maternal water stress. Base water potential represents a water potential threshold at or below which no germination will occur. As a key parameter in the hydrotime model, Ψb(g) measures the germination tolerance of species (population) to drought: lower (more negative) Ψb(g) values indicate that seeds can germinate from drier conditions (e.g., soils). The present study tests the hypothesis that plants grown under water stress will produce seeds characterized with lower Ψb(g) values and will therefore be capable of germinating under drier conditions compared with seeds originating from well-watered plants. This study represents the first step in developing transgenerational germination models that incorporate environmental conditions before and after seed dispersal. This study used A. palmeri, which is one of the most troublesome weeds in the United States, and hopefully could help with the development of decision support systems for effective management of this pervasive weed.

Materials and Methods

Seeds of two populations of A. palmeri, one from California (CA) and one from Kansas (KS) were provided by Anil Shrestha (California State University, Fresno, CA) and Dallas E. Peterson (Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS), respectively. A greenhouse experiment was conducted at the Orchard Parks greenhouse facilities of the University of California, Davis, during the summer of 2018. Round plastic pots (2.37 L) were filled with a soil mix (1:1 sand/peat) plus a controlled-release fertilizer (15–9–12, 150 g 75 L−1; Scotts Osmocote® PLUS, Mississauga, ON, Canada). Approximately 10 seeds from each A. palmeri population were sown into a total of 200 pots, 100 for each population. Plants were grown in a greenhouse with a temperature range of 32/22 C (day/night) and daylength of 16 h provided through supplementary lighting. Seedlings were thinned randomly to achieve one plant per pot by the 4-leaf stage. All plants received normal irrigation using four emitters inserted into the potting medium to deliver 65 ml of water min−1 for 2 min, twice per day (7:00 AM and 2:00 PM). For each population, when plants reached the 6-leaf stage, 50 pots (replicates) were randomly assigned to water-stress treatment by removing three out of four drip emitters, which reduced the amount of water by ~75% (field capacity 6% to 13%). The remaining 50 pots continued to receive normal irrigation (field capacity 35% to 42%), as described earlier. Seeds were harvested at full maturity as determined by inspecting the inflorescences for the presence of black, firm seeds (Mesgaran et al. Reference Mesgaran, Matzrafi and Ohadi2019).

Seed Weight and Size Measurements

One month after harvest, 10 seed subsamples from each population by maternal water treatment combinations, containing 100 seeds each, were weighed using a precision scale (ME104E™, Mettler-Toledo, Columbus, OH) to obtain 1,000-seed weight data. Seeds (40 to 70 seeds) were imaged using a Leica M205 FA stereomicroscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzler, Germany) equipped with a digital camera (Leica MC190 HD Camera) and built-in image analytical software (LAS X Core) to measure the seed size based on the surface area.

Seed Germination Tests

Germination (both parental and progeny generations) was tested under five nominal water potentials (0, −0.2, −0.4, −0.6, and −0.8 MPa) at two constant temperatures of 20 and 30 C representing suboptimal and optimal temperatures for germination of A. palmeri, respectively (Guo and Al-Khatib Reference Guo and Al-Khatib2003; Steckel et al. Reference Steckel, Sprague, Stolle and Wax2004). Experiments were conducted with four replicates (petri dishes) per treatment and repeated twice. Experimental runs were rotated between two growth chambers (Conviron® CMP 6010, Winnipeg, Canada). Solutions were prepared by dissolving appropriate amounts of polyethylene glycol 8000 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in deionized water according to Michel (Reference Michel1983). Filter papers (Whatman® Grade 2; Sigma-Aldrich) were soaked in each solution containing the desired water potential for 12 h before the experiment, as recommended by Hardegree and Emmerich (Reference Hardegree and Emmerich1990). The water potential of each solution was tested twice: before and after adding the filter papers to the solution using a Wescor Vapro osmometer (Wescor, Logan, UT, USA). For each treatment, 40 seeds from each population were placed in a 9-cm petri dish lined with moistened filter paper and sealed with Parafilm® to reduce water loss from the dishes.

Hydrotime Model and Statistical Analysis

The hydrotime model is based on a linear relationship between germination rate, GR (i.e., the inverse of time to a given germination percentile, 1/t g) and the medium water potential, Ψ (Bradford Reference Bradford2002; Gummerson Reference Gummerson1986):

([1]) $${{{\rm{GR}} = }\frac{{1}\over{{{t_g}}}} {= \frac{{{\left( {{\rm{\Psi }} - {{\rm{\Psi }}_{b\left( g \right)}}} \right)}}\over{{{{\rm\theta }}_H}}}{\rm{\;\;\;\;\;}}}}$$

where tg is time to germination of a given percentile g (the subscript “g” indicates the germination percentile), θH is hydrotime constant describing the amount of time (in MPa day or MPa hour units) required for germination of any fractions of the seed subpopulation. The main feature of the hydrotime model is that base water potential varies among seeds (hence the subscript “g” in Ψb(g)), giving rise to varaiton in timing of germination for each individual seed, as shown below after rearranging Equation 1 for Ψb(g):

([2]) $${{\rm{\Psi }}_{b\left( g \right)}} = {\rm{\Psi }} - \left( {\frac{{{{\rm{\theta }}_H}}}\over{{{t_g}}}} \right)$$

Variability in Ψb(g) in a seed population can be described by various statistical frequency distributions (Mesgaran et al. Reference Mesgaran, Mashhadi, Alizadeh, Hunt, Young and Cousens2013; Watt et al. Reference Watt, Xu and Bloomberg2010), but most often is assumed to be normally distributed with its respective mean (median), Ψb(50), and standard deviation, σΨb (Bradford Reference Bradford1990, Reference Bradford2002). Assuming a normal distribution, the cumulative germination of seeds, g, over time, t, at any given water potential, Ψ, can be obtained by:

$$g\left( {{\rm{\Psi }}, {t_g}} \right) = \;{\rm{\Phi }}\left( {{{\rm{\Psi }}_{b\left( g \right)}}, {{\rm{\Psi }}_{b\left( {50} \right)}}, {{\rm{\sigma }}_{{\rm{\Psi }}b}}} \right)\;\;\;\;\;$$

Replacing Ψb(g) with Equation 2 gives:

([3]) $$g\left( {{\rm{\Psi }}, {t_g}} \right) = {\rm{\;\Phi }}\left( {{\rm{\Psi }} - \left( {\frac{{{{\rm{\theta }}_H}}}\over{{{t_g}}}} \right), {{\rm{\Psi }}_{b\left( {50} \right)}}, {{\rm{\sigma }}_{{\rm{\Psi }}b}}} \right){\rm{\;\;\;\;\;}}$$

where Φ is the cumulative distribution function of a normal distribution. Equation 3 was fit to germination data using the drcSeedGerm package (Onofri et al. Reference Onofri, Benincasa, Mesgaran and Ritz2018) in R (R Core Team 2020). The hydrotime model (Equation 3) was fit to germination data of each temperature and population separately. To obtain robust standard errors for model parameters, we implemented the delete-a-group jackknife technique (Onofri et al. Reference Onofri, Mesgaran, Neve and Cousens2014) using the jackGroupSE() function available in drcSeedGerm package (Onofri et al. Reference Onofri, Benincasa, Mesgaran and Ritz2018). This method provides more accurate estimates of standard errors for cumulative data such as germination curves (Onofri et al. Reference Onofri, Mesgaran, Neve and Cousens2014). To test whether the germination curves differed between the two maternal watering levels, a reduced hydrotime model that ignored the maternal treatment as grouping factor was fit to the data. Using the anova() function in R (R Core Team 2020), an F-test was conducted to test whether the size of error in the reduced model is significantly larger than that of the full model: the full model included the maternal water environment as a grouping factor. A significant P-value (≤0.05) indicates that the germination curves significantly differ between the two maternal water conditions.

Parental plant height and progeny seed weight and seed size were compared across the two maternal water treatments (water-deficit vs. well-watered) using the t-test with Proc TTEST in SAS (v. 9.4; SAS Institute 2019). As a surrogate measure of dormancy level, the total percent germination at 0 MPa and 30 C treatment, representing the optimal conditions for germination of A. palmeri (Steckel et al. Reference Steckel, Sprague, Stolle and Wax2004), was further analyzed using generalized linear mixed models with PROC GLIMMIX in SAS (v. 9.4). In this analysis, a binomial distribution with the logit function was used, and maternal water treatment was considered the fixed effect, while the experimental run was incorporated as the random effect. Data from each population were analyzed separately. Visual assessment of residuals (plotted against fitted values) showed no evidence of variance heteroscedasticity.

Results and Discussion

Our irrigation scheme was effective in causing stress in the water deficit treatment, as evidenced by significant reduction in plant height of both A. palmeri populations (P-value < 0.0001). Plant height was almost halved in plants exposed to the water deficit treatment (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Plant height for Amaranthus palmeri populations (California and Kansas) grown under continuous water-deficit or well-watered irrigation conditions. Vertical lines on bars indicate SE.

Seed Weight and Area

Analysis of progeny 1,000-seed weight showed significant differences between the two maternal water treatments both in the California (P-value = 0.0003) and the Kansas (P-value = 0.0003) populations. In both populations of A. palmeri, seeds produced under water stress were 18% heavier than those produced by plants under normal irrigation (Figure 2). The 1,000-seed weights of original (parental) seeds were 290.7 mg (SE: 8.5) and 279.5 mg (SE: 8.2) for the California and Kansas collections, respectively.

Figure 2. Differences in 1,000-seed weight, seed surface area, and total germination (dormancy) of progeny seeds from two Amaranthus palmeri populations (California and Kansas) grown under continuous water-deficit (WD) or well-watered (WW) irrigation conditions. Vertical bars on data points indicate SE.

Progeny seed size, as measured by the seed surface area, differed between maternal water treatments in the California population (P-value = 0.0117) but not in the Kansas population (P-value = 0.7534). In the California population, progeny seed surface area increased by 23% in response to maternal water stress (Figure 2). The surface areas of parental seeds used in the study were 0.656 mm2 (SE: 0.023) for the California population and 0.621 mm2 (SE: 0.037) for the Kansas population. As seed surface area in the Kansas population was constant across the two maternal conditions, the increase in seed mass observed with the water-deficit treatment should have resulted from the increase in seed thickness and/or density. Previous studies with crop plants such as lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) (Sehgal et al. Reference Sehgal, Sita, Kumar, Kumar, Singh, Siddique and Nayyar2017), soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] (Wijewardana et al. Reference Wijewardana, Raja Reddy, Jason Krutz, Gao and Bellaloui2019), and canola (Brassica napus L.) (Hatzig et al. Reference Hatzig, Nuppenau, Snowdon and Schießl2018) have shown that applying water stress to parental plants may negatively affect yield-related traits and reduce final seed weight. In cereal crops such as rice (Oryza sativa L.), maize (Zea mays L.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), water stress at the grain-filling stage translated to a shorter grain-filling period, eventually leading to lower seed weight (Saini and Westgate Reference Saini and Westgate1999). However, similar to our findings, a greenhouse study with redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) showed that plants subjected to water stress produced heavier seeds (greater mass) than those grown without drought (Chadoeuf-Hannel and Barralis Reference Chadoeuf-Hannel and Barralis1982). Greater seed mass in A. retroflexus was also associated with drier environments in the correlative study of Schimpf (Reference Schimpf1977). Three of four Polygonum spp. (i.e., ladysthumb [Polygonum persicaria L.], tufted knotweed [Polygonum cespitosum Blume], and pale smartweed [Polygonum lapathifolium L.]) tested by Sultan (Reference Sultan2001) produced larger achenes in dry rather than moist environments. Interestingly, the noninvasive species marshpepper smartweed (Polygonum hydropiper L.) was the only species that produced smaller achenes in dry soils. Whereas our study shows that maternal drought can markedly affect seed mass and size in A. palmeri, shading, even as high as 87%, had no effect on seed weight of A. palmeri (Jha et al. Reference Jha, Norsworthy, Riley and Bridges2010).

Seed Dormancy

Progeny seed dormancy was evaluated by testing the germination of A. palmeri seeds at optimal temperature (i.e., 30 C; Steckel et al. Reference Steckel, Sprague, Stolle and Wax2004). Maternal water stress significantly affected the dormancy level in progeny seeds of both the California (P-value = 0.0004) and Kansas (P-value < 0.0001) populations. Plants that experienced water stress produced the least dormant seeds (Figure 2). For example, in the Kansas population, the total germination for seeds originating from water-stressed plants was as high as 87.5% (SE: 2.6) but dropped to 55.6% (SE: 3.7) in seeds from plants receiving normal irrigation (Figure 2). In the California population, the total germination for seeds from the water-deficit treatment was 20% higher than for the control. The parental seeds used in the study exhibited dormancy levels similar to those produced by well-watered plants: California parental seeds germinated 30.6% (SE: 2.3), while parental seed sourced from Kansas reached 65.0% (SE: 3.7) germination.

In several other weed species such as johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.] (Arnold et al. Reference Arnold, Fenner and Edwards1992) and A. retroflexus (Karimmojeni et al. Reference Karimmojeni, Bazrafshan, Majidi, Torabian and Rashidi2014), when parental plants were exposed to water stress during seed production, progeny seeds showed increased germination rates compared with seeds of plants grown under control irrigation conditions. However, an opposite trend has been recorded for germination of seeds from maternally stressed plants in crops. In soybean, increasing maternal drought stress translated into lower seed germination rates (Wijewardana et al. Reference Wijewardana, Raja Reddy, Jason Krutz, Gao and Bellaloui2019). For canola, differences in mean germination time between seeds of genotypes grown under water stress was not conclusive, although some genotypes grown under water stress took longer to germinate than the control (Hatzig et al. Reference Hatzig, Nuppenau, Snowdon and Schießl2018). Differences between crop plants and weedy species may be explained due to evolutionary changes related to historical domestication and breeding processes. One of the main features of plants that have undergone strong domestication processes is reduced seed dormancy through changes in seed coat thickness (e.g., physical dormancy) or biochemical seed composition (e.g., physiological dormancy) (Abbo et al. Reference Abbo, Pinhasi van-Oss, Gopher, Saranga, Ofner and Peleg2014). Different drought stress responses were reported when weedy and domesticated populations of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) were compared (Koziol et al. Reference Koziol, Rieseberg, Kane and Bever2012).

Seed germination is regulated by several plant hormones, mainly abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellic acid (GA) accumulated in the embryo during seed development (Bewley Reference Bewley1997; Kermode Reference Kermode2005). Physiological seed dormancy is regulated by ABA/GA ratio, where ABA prevents and GA promotes seed germination. ABA level increases during initial seed development and decreases during seed maturity; however, this process can be affected by environmental signals (Bewley Reference Bewley1997). In grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] seeds, water stress decreased both embryo content and sensitivity to ABA (Benech Arnold et al. Reference Benech Arnold, Fenner and Edwards1991). Elevated ABA levels were recorded in seeds of A. palmeri plants grown under 87% shade compared with 0% shade conditions (Jha et al. Reference Jha, Norsworthy, Riley and Bridges2010).

Hydrotime Germination Model

With few exceptions, the hydrotime model adequately described the germination time courses of A. palmeri at both tested temperatures as shown by fitted curves (Figures 3 and 4) and small root mean-square error (RMSE) as shown in Table 1. There were marked differences in progress toward germination between the two maternal water conditions. In both A. palmeri populations, seeds from water-stressed plants achieved greater germination percentages (almost double) than those from plants with no water stress across all levels of water potentials tested in this study (Figures 3 and 4).

Figure 3. The effect of maternal water conditions (continuous water-deficit vs. well-watered) on cumulative germination of progeny seeds in two Amaranthus palmeri populations (California and Kansas) tested under various water potentials at 20 C. Lines are fitted values obtained from the hydrotime model, Equation 3, $$\;g\left( {{\rm{\Psi }}, {t_g}} \right) = {{\it\Phi} \left( {{\rm{\Psi }} - \left( {\frac{{{{\rm{\theta }}_H}}}\over{{{t_g}}}} \right), \ {{\rm{\Psi }}_{b\left( {50} \right)}}, \ {{\rm{\sigma }}_{{\rm\Psi }}b}}} \right)$$ , with parameter estimates shown in Table 1.

Figure 4. The effect of maternal water conditions (continuous water-deficit vs. well-watered) on cumulative germination of progeny seeds in two Amaranthus palmeri populations (California and Kansas) tested under various water potentials at 30 C. Lines are fitted values obtained from the hydrotime model, Equation 3, $$g\left( {{\rm{\Psi }}, {t_g}} \right) = \it\Phi \left( {{\rm{\Psi }} - \left( {\frac{{{{\rm{\theta }}_H}}}\over{{{t_g}}}} \right), {{\rm{\Psi }}_{b\left( {50} \right)}}, {{\rm{\sigma }}_{{\rm{\Psi }}b}}} \right), \ $$ with parameter estimates shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Parameter estimates of hydrotime model of germination, Equation 3, $$\;g\left( {{\rm\Psi }}, {t_g}} \right) = \;{\rm\Phi} \left( {{\rm{\Psi }} - \left( {\frac{{{{\rm{\theta }}_H}}}\over{{{t_g}}}} \right), {{\rm{\Psi }}_{b\left( {50} \right)}}, {{\rm{\sigma }}_{{\rm{\Psi }}b}}} \right)$$, for progeny seeds of two Amaranthus palmeri populations (California and Kansas) grown under contrasting maternal water conditions.a

a Germination assays were conducted at two temperatures (20 and 30 C), and the hydrotime model was fit to data of each temperature separately. Also shown are the parameter estimates for the original (parental) seed sources used to grow plants under the two maternal water treatments. Values in the parenthesis indicate SE.

b RMSE, root mean-square error. Note that a single hydrotime model that included the maternal water environment as a covariate was fit to the germination data of each population. As result, there is one RMSE for both maternal water conditions.

c P-value indicates the overall significance level for the difference between the germination curves (models) of the two maternal water levels, i.e., water-deficit vs. well-watered treatments.

The observed changes in germination capacity of seeds (Figures 3 and 4) can largely be attributed to shifts in population base water potential (Ψb(50)) and to a lesser extent to its standard deviation (i.e., σΨb), as hydrotime constant (θH) was not affected by the maternal environment (Table 1). Base water potential exhibited a consistent pattern of response to maternal water treatments across the two tested temperatures and in both A. palmeri populations. Maternal drought significantly shifted the distribution of base water potential in progeny seed subpopulations toward more negative values (Figure 5), implying that the resultant seeds have become more tolerant to water limitation and hence can germinate from drier conditions. For example, in the Kansas population, the estimated Ψb(50) was −0.63 MPa (SE: 0.036) at 30 C when seeds matured on water-stressed plants, which was three times more negative than the Ψb(50) (i.e., −0.21 MPa, SE: 0.025) of seeds produced by nonstressed plants. These Ψb(50) values suggest that if seeds from nonstressed plants are planted into a medium with a water potential of −0.63 MPa, only 18% of them are predicted to germinate as contrasted to 50% germination for seeds from water-stressed plants. Maternal water stress also reduced the variance of Ψb(g) in seed subpopulations as indicated by smaller σΨb values with the only exception being the progeny seed from California population tested at 30 C (Table 1; Figure 5). As parameter σΨb in the hydrotime model is a measure of germination uniformity, reduction in σΨb implies a higher uniformity for A. palmeri seeds originating from maternally stressed plants.

Figure 5. Shifts in distribution of base water potential of progeny seeds from two Amaranthus palmeri populations (California and Kansas) grown under contrasting maternal water conditions (continuous water-deficit vs. well-watered). Seed germination was tested at two temperatures (20 and 30 C) under five water potentials. A hydrotime model, Equation 3, $$g\left( {{\rm{\Psi }}, {t_g}} \right) = \it\Phi \left( {{\rm{\Psi }} - \left( {\frac{{{{\rm{\theta }}_H}}}\over{{{t_g}}}} \right) {{\rm{\Psi }}_{b\left( {50} \right)}}, {{\rm{\sigma }}_{{\rm{\Psi }}b}}} \right), \ $$was fit to estimate the median base water potentials, Ψb(50) (vertical dashed lines), and their respective standard deviations, σΨb, to produce these probability density curves of normal distribution (see Table 1 for parameter estimates). Note that the area under the curve for base water potential values >0 indicates the proportion of seeds that have not germinated (i.e., dormancy level).

We are only aware of a single study that has examined the effect of maternal water level on the germination tolerance of progeny seed to water limitation. Seed of wild tomato (Lycopersicon chilense Dunal) (an endemic tomato species in Chile) from mother plants grown under water deficit were able to germinate at a lower water potential than those from plants receiving ample water supply (Maldonado et al. Reference Maldonado, Pujado and Squeo2002). Low temperature during seed maturation reduced the ability of mouseear cress [Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh.] to germinate at low water potential (Edwards et al. Reference Edwards, Burghardt, Zapata-Garcia and Donohue2016).

Our results suggest that a transgenerational hydrotime model can be developed by adjusting Ψb(50), and perhaps σΨb, to adequately describe the progeny seed germination. A shift in Ψb(50) toward more negative values has been associated with reduced dormancy in other studies (Batlla and Benech-Arnold Reference Batlla and Benech-Arnold2004; Bradford Reference Bradford2002). For example, temporal change in seed dormancy of prostrate knotweed (Polygonum aviculare L.) was also modeled by using Ψb(50) alone, as the θH and σΨb parameters changed only slightly with dormancy level (Batlla and Benech-Arnold Reference Batlla and Benech-Arnold2004).

Future studies need to use multiple levels of maternal water limitation to determine the shape of relationships between maternal water level and Ψb(50) and σΨb; for example, whether they are linear or nonlinear. Our study used continuous water stress (from 6-leaf stage onward); however, it is likely that only stress at the reproductive stage (i.e., when seed develops) will be important in driving maternal effects, as shown in several studies (reviewed by Baskin and Baskin Reference Baskin and Baskin2014). Applying water stress at different parental growth stages can inform us about the most influential stage that can produce maternal effects.

Conclusions

Our results show that A. palmeri plants experiencing water stress during their growth can produce less dormant and larger seeds that may give rise to competitive and vigorous seedlings. Moreover, we showed, for the first time, that A. palmeri parental plants grown under water-deficit conditions can produce seeds that are more drought tolerant and hence can germinate under drier conditions compared with seeds from nonstressed plants. These maternal effects seem to be adaptive, as the mother plant exposed to stress produced progeny somewhat primed (prepared) to cope with the harsh environments similar to maternal conditions. The consistency in germination responses of progeny seed to maternal conditions suggests that further models of germination (and emergence) need to be transgenerational, as the “memory” of past environment can have a marked influence on the responses of seeds to current conditions.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Anil Shrestha (California State University, Fresno, CA) and Dallas E. Peterson (Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS) for providing the seed used in the greenhouse experiments. The authors would also like to thank Hannah Clifton and William Werner for greenhouse maintenance. This research was funded by a UC Davis New Research Initiatives and Interdisciplinary Research Grant. No conflicts of interest have been declared.

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Ramon G. Leon, North Carolina State University

References

Abbo, S, Pinhasi van-Oss, R, Gopher, A, Saranga, Y, Ofner, I, Peleg, Z (2014) Plant domestication versus crop evolution: a conceptual framework for cereals and grain legumes. Trends Plant Sci 19:351360 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adkins, SW, Armstrong, LJ (2007) The effect of light intensity on seed production and quality in a number of Australian wild oat (Avena fatua L.) lines. Pages 383–397 in Adkins SW, Ashmore SE, Navie SC, eds. Seeds: Biology, Development and Ecology. Eighth International Workshop on Seeds, Brisbane, Australia. Wallingford, UK: CAB InternationalCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, VJ (2002) Nutrients, arbuscular mycorrhizas and competition interact to influence seed production and germination success in Achillea millefolium . Funct Ecol 16:742749 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, L (1996) Characteristics of seeds and seedlings from weeds treated with sublethal herbicide doses. Weed Res 36: 5564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, RLB, Fenner, M, Edwards, PJ (1992) Changes in dormancy level in Sorghum halepense seeds induced by water stress during seed development. Funct Ecol 6:596605 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM (2014) Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. San Diego, CA: Elsevier. 1600 p Google Scholar
Baskin, JM, Baskin, CC (1985) The annual dormancy cycle in buried weed seeds: a continuum. BioScience 35:492498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, JM, Baskin, CC (2019) How much influence does the paternal parent have on seed germination? Seed Sci Res 29:111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batlla, D, Benech-Arnold, RL (2004) A predictive model for dormancy loss in Polygonum aviculare L. seeds based on changes in population hydrotime parameters. Seed Sci Res 14:277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benech Arnold, RL, Fenner, M, Edwards, PJ (1991) Changes in germinability, ABA content and ABA embryonic sensitivity in developing seeds of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. induced by water stress during grain filling. New Phytol 118:339347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, J (1997) Seed germination and dormancy. Plant Cell 9:10551066 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradford, KJ (1990) A water relations analysis of seed germination rates. Plant Physiol 94:840849 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradford, KJ (2002) Applications of hydrothermal time to quantifying and modeling seed germination and dormancy. Weed Sci 50:248260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, KJ, Still, DW (2004) Applications of hydrotime analysis in seed testing. Seed Technol 26:7585 Google Scholar
Chadoeuf-Hannel, R, Barralis, G (1982) Influence de differents regimes hydriques sur la croissance vegetative, le poids et al germination des graines d’une mauvaise herbe cultivee en serre: Amaranthus retroflexus L. Agronomie 2:835841 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, K, Heschel, MS, Butler, CM, Barua, D, Sharrock, RA, Whitelam, GC, Chiang, GC (2008) Diversification of phytochrome contributions to germination as a function of seed-maturation environment. New Phytol 177:367379 Google ScholarPubMed
Donohue, K, Rubio de Casas, R, Burghardt, L, Kovach, K, Willis, CG (2010) Germination, postgermination adaptation, and species ecological ranges. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:293319 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, BR, Burghardt, LT, Zapata-Garcia, M, Donohue, K (2016) Maternal temperature effects on dormancy influence germination responses to water availability in Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ Exp 126:5567 Google Scholar
Egley, GH, William, RD (1991) Emergence periodicity of six summer annual weed species. Weed Sci 39:595600 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnsworth, EJ, Bazzaz, FA (1995) Inter- and intra-generic differences in growth, reproduction, and fitness of nine herbaceous annual species grown in elevated CO2 environments. Oecologia 104:454466 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenner, M (1991) The effects of the parent environment on seed germinability. Seed Sci Res 1:7584 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F, Arnold, RLB, Sanchez, R, Ghersa, CM (2000) Modeling seedling emergence. Field Crops Res 67:123139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gianinetti, A, Cohn, MA (2007) Seed dormancy in red rice. XII: Population-based analysis of dry-afterripening with a hydrotime model. Seed Sci Res 4:253271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gummerson, RJ (1986) The effect of constant temperatures and osmotic potentials on the germination of sugar beet. J Exp Bot 37:729741 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, P, Al-Khatib, K (2003) Temperature effects on germination and growth of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), Palmer amaranth (A. palmeri), and common waterhemp (A. rudis). Weed Sci 51:869875 Google Scholar
Hardegree, SP, Emmerich, WE (1990) Effect of polyethylene glycol exclusion on the water potential of solution-saturated filter paper. Plant Physiol 92:462466 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatzig, SV, Nuppenau, JN, Snowdon, RJ, Schießl, SV (2018) Drought stress has transgenerational effects on seeds and seedlings in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). BMC Plant Biol 18:113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jha, P, Norsworthy, JK, Riley, MB, Bridges, W (2010) Shade and plant location effects on germination and hormone content of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) seed. Weed Sci 58:1621 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karimmojeni, H, Bazrafshan, AH, Majidi, MM, Torabian, S, Rashidi, B (2014) Effect of maternal nitrogen and drought stress on seed dormancy and germinability of Amaranthus retroflexus. Plant Species Biol 29:e1e8 Google Scholar
Kathiria, P, Sidler, C, Golubov, A, Kalischuk, M, Kawchuk, LM, Kovalchuk, I (2010) Tobacco mosaic virus infection results in an increase in recombination frequency and resistance to viral, bacterial, and fungal pathogens in the progeny of infected tobacco plants. Plant Physiol 153:18591870 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kermode, AR (2005) Role of abscisic acid in seed dormancy. J Plant Growth Regul 24:319344 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koziol, L, Rieseberg, LH, Kane, N, Bever, JD (2012) Reduced drought tolerance during domestication and the evolution of weediness results from tolerance-growth trade-offs. Evolution 66:38033814 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laossi, KR, Noguera, DC, Barot, S (2010) Earthworm-mediated maternal effects on seed germination and seedling growth in three annual plants. Soil Biol Biochem 42:319323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maldonado, C, Pujado, E, Squeo, FA (2002) El efecto de la disponibilidad de agua durante el crecimiento de Lycopersicon chilense sobre la capacidad de sus semillas para germinar a distintas temperaturas y concentraciones de manitol y NaCl. Rev Chil Hist Nat 75:651660 Google Scholar
Mesgaran, MB, Mashhadi, HR, Alizadeh, H, Hunt, J, Young, KR, Cousens, RD (2013) Importance of distribution function selection for hydrothermal time models of seed germination. Weed Res 53:89101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesgaran, MB, Matzrafi, M, Ohadi, S (2019) Sex lability and dimorphism in diecious Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). bioRxiv, doi: 10.1101/769935 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, BE (1983) Evaluation of the water potentials of solutions of polyethylene glycol 8000 both in the absence and presence of other solutes. Plant Physiol 72:6670 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nurse, RE, DiTommaso, A (2005) Corn competition alters the germinability of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seeds. Weed Sci 53:479488 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nurse, RE, DiTommaso, A, Ramirez, RA (2004) Planting date effects on the germinability and seedling vigour of Abutilon theophrasti (Malvaceae) seeds. Phytoprotection 85:161168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onofri, A, Benincasa, P, Mesgaran, MB, Ritz, C (2018) Hydrothermal-time-to-event models for seed germination. Eur J Agron 101:129139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onofri, A, Mesgaran, MB, Neve, P, Cousens, RD (2014) Experimental design and parameter estimation for threshold models in seed germination. Weed Res 54:425435 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2020) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org Google Scholar
Roach, DA, Wulff, RD (1987) Maternal effects in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 18:209235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saini, HS, Westgate, ME (1999) Reproductive development in grain crops during drought. Adv Agron 68:5996 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute (2019) SAS/STAT®15.1 User’s Guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
Schimpf, DJ (1977) Seed weight of Amaranthus retroflexus in relation to moisture and length of growing season. Ecology 58:450453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sehgal, A, Sita, K, Kumar, J, Kumar, S, Singh, S, Siddique, KHM, Nayyar, H (2017) Effects of drought, heat and their interaction on the growth, yield and photosynthetic function of lentil (Lens culinaris medikus) genotypes varying in heat and drought sensitivity. Front Plant Sci 8:1776 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steckel, LE, Sprague, CL, Stolle, EW, Wax, LM (2004) Temperature effects on germination of nine Amaranthus species. Weed Sci 52:217221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sultan, SE (2001) Phenotypic plasticity for fitness components in Polygonum species of contrasting ecological breadth. Ecology 82:328343 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hinsberg, A (1998) Maternal and ambient environmental effects of light on germination of Plantago lanceolata: correlated responses to selection on leaf length. Funct Ecol 12:825833 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Abrams, GJ, Hand, ME (1956) Seed dormancy in Rosa as a function of climate. Am J Bot 43:712 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, MS, Xu, V, Bloomberg, M (2010) Development of a hydrothermal time seed germination model which uses the Weibull distribution to describe base water potential. Ecol Model 221:12671272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wijewardana, C, Raja Reddy, K, Jason Krutz, L, Gao, W, Bellaloui, N (2019) Drought stress has transgenerational effects on soybean seed germination and seedling vigor. PLoS ONE 14:120 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, KL, Seavers, GP, Peters, NC, Marshall, MA (1999) Influence of soil moisture on the competitive ability and seed dormancy of Sinapis arvensis in spring wheat. Weed Res 39:309317 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Plant height for Amaranthus palmeri populations (California and Kansas) grown under continuous water-deficit or well-watered irrigation conditions. Vertical lines on bars indicate SE.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Differences in 1,000-seed weight, seed surface area, and total germination (dormancy) of progeny seeds from two Amaranthus palmeri populations (California and Kansas) grown under continuous water-deficit (WD) or well-watered (WW) irrigation conditions. Vertical bars on data points indicate SE.

Figure 2

Figure 3. The effect of maternal water conditions (continuous water-deficit vs. well-watered) on cumulative germination of progeny seeds in two Amaranthus palmeri populations (California and Kansas) tested under various water potentials at 20 C. Lines are fitted values obtained from the hydrotime model, Equation 3, $$\;g\left( {{\rm{\Psi }}, {t_g}} \right) = {{\it\Phi} \left( {{\rm{\Psi }} - \left( {\frac{{{{\rm{\theta }}_H}}}\over{{{t_g}}}} \right), \ {{\rm{\Psi }}_{b\left( {50} \right)}}, \ {{\rm{\sigma }}_{{\rm\Psi }}b}}} \right)$$ , with parameter estimates shown in Table 1.

Figure 3

Figure 4. The effect of maternal water conditions (continuous water-deficit vs. well-watered) on cumulative germination of progeny seeds in two Amaranthus palmeri populations (California and Kansas) tested under various water potentials at 30 C. Lines are fitted values obtained from the hydrotime model, Equation 3, $$g\left( {{\rm{\Psi }}, {t_g}} \right) = \it\Phi \left( {{\rm{\Psi }} - \left( {\frac{{{{\rm{\theta }}_H}}}\over{{{t_g}}}} \right), {{\rm{\Psi }}_{b\left( {50} \right)}}, {{\rm{\sigma }}_{{\rm{\Psi }}b}}} \right), \ $$ with parameter estimates shown in Table 1.

Figure 4

Table 1. Parameter estimates of hydrotime model of germination, Equation 3, $$\;g\left( {{\rm\Psi }}, {t_g}} \right) = \;{\rm\Phi} \left( {{\rm{\Psi }} - \left( {\frac{{{{\rm{\theta }}_H}}}\over{{{t_g}}}} \right), {{\rm{\Psi }}_{b\left( {50} \right)}}, {{\rm{\sigma }}_{{\rm{\Psi }}b}}} \right)$$, for progeny seeds of two Amaranthus palmeri populations (California and Kansas) grown under contrasting maternal water conditions.a

Figure 5

Figure 5. Shifts in distribution of base water potential of progeny seeds from two Amaranthus palmeri populations (California and Kansas) grown under contrasting maternal water conditions (continuous water-deficit vs. well-watered). Seed germination was tested at two temperatures (20 and 30 C) under five water potentials. A hydrotime model, Equation 3, $$g\left( {{\rm{\Psi }}, {t_g}} \right) = \it\Phi \left( {{\rm{\Psi }} - \left( {\frac{{{{\rm{\theta }}_H}}}\over{{{t_g}}}} \right) {{\rm{\Psi }}_{b\left( {50} \right)}}, {{\rm{\sigma }}_{{\rm{\Psi }}b}}} \right), \ $$was fit to estimate the median base water potentials, Ψb(50) (vertical dashed lines), and their respective standard deviations, σΨb, to produce these probability density curves of normal distribution (see Table 1 for parameter estimates). Note that the area under the curve for base water potential values >0 indicates the proportion of seeds that have not germinated (i.e., dormancy level).

You have Access
Open access
1
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Under pressure: maternal effects promote drought tolerance in progeny seed of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri)
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Under pressure: maternal effects promote drought tolerance in progeny seed of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri)
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Under pressure: maternal effects promote drought tolerance in progeny seed of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri)
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *