Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T05:04:21.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of weedy rice (Oryza spp.) germplasm from Arkansas to glyphosate, glufosinate, and flumioxazin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2019

Swati Shrestha ,
Gourav Sharma ,
Nilda Roma Burgos  and
Te-Ming Tseng Open the ORCID record for Te-Ming Tseng [Opens in a new window]
Swati Shrestha
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Plant and Soil Sciences Department, Mississippi State University, MS, USA
Gourav Sharma
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Plant and Soil Sciences Department, Mississippi State University, MS, USA
Nilda Roma Burgos
Affiliation:
Professor, Crop, Soil and Environmental Science Department, University of Arkansas Fayetteville, AR, USA
Te-Ming Tseng*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Plant and Soil Sciences Department, Mississippi State University, MS, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Te-Ming Tseng, Email: t.tseng@msstate.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weedy rice (Oryza spp.) is one of the most competitive weeds in rice (Oryza sativa L.) production. Rapid growth, high tillering, enhanced ability to uptake fertilizers, asynchronous maturation, seed shattering, and high seedbank longevity make Oryza spp. more competitive than cultivated rice and highly persistent. Oryza spp. may be a source of useful traits for crop improvement such as herbicide tolerance. Greenhouse studies were conducted to evaluate the response of 54 Oryza spp. accessions collected between 2008 and 2009 from Arkansas to glyphosate, glufosinate, and flumioxazin applied at field rates. Rice cultivars ‘CL163’ and ‘REX’ were included for comparison. Accessions B20, B2, and S11 and B49, B51, and S59 showed reduced sensitivity to glyphosate and flumioxazin, respectively. These accessions had less than 40% injury 5 wk after treatment (WAT). Rice cultivars (CL163 and REX) were sensitive to both glyphosate and flumioxazin, with more than 95% plant mortality at 5 WAT. On average, blackhull accessions were more tolerant to glyphosate and flumioxazin than strawhull accessions. Dose–response analysis of B20, B2, and S11 confirmed 3- to 8-fold higher tolerance of these accessions to glyphosate. All Oryza spp. and cultivated rice were not affected by glufosinate applied at 874 g ai ha−1 (1X) and were controlled 100% by 1,311 g ai ha−1 (1.5X). Oryza spp. lines with reduced sensitivity to glyphosate and flumioxazin will be studied further for use in rice crop improvement.

Keywords

Muthukumar V. Bagavathiannan, Texas A&M UniversityCrop improvementherbicideweedy rice management
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 67 , Issue 3 , May 2019 , pp. 303 - 310
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, SM, Chandler, JM, Bridges, DC (1987) Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) ecotype response to herbicides. Weed Technol 1:221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgos, NR, Norman, RJ, Gealy, DR, Black, H (2006) Competitive N uptake between rice and weedy rice. J Field Crops Res 99:96–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgos, NR, Norsworthy, JK, Scott, RC, Smith, KL (2008) Red rice (Oryza sativa) status after 5 years of imidazolinone-resistant rice technology in Arkansas. Weed Technol 22:200–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgos, NR, Shivrain, VK, Scott, RC, Mauromoustakos, A, Kuk, YI, Sales, MA, Bullington, J (2011) Differential tolerance of weedy red rice (Oryza sativa L.) from Arkansas, USA to glyphosate. Crop Prot 30:986–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS (2012) Weed ecology and weed management strategies for dry-seeded rice in Asia. Weed Technol 26:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantin, MJ (1960) Characteristics of Red Rice in Louisiana. Ph.D dissertation. Baton Rouge LA: Louisiana State University. Pp 91–100.Google Scholar
Delouche, JC, Burgos, NR, Gealy, DR, Martin, GZ, Labrada, R, Larinde, M, Rosell, C (2007) Vigour and competitiveness of weedy rices. Pages 64–75 in Weedy Rice: Origin, Biology, Ecology, and Control (FAO Plant Production and Protection Papers Book 188). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
Diarra, A, Smith, RJ Jr, Talbert, RE (1985) Growth and morphological characteristics of red rice (Oryza sativa) biotypes. Weed Sci 33:310–314Google Scholar
Fogliatto, S, Vidotto, F, Ferrero, A (2011) Germination of weedy rice in response to field conditions during winter. Weed Technol 25:252–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frans, R, Talbert, R, Marx, D, Crowley, H, eds (1986) Experimental Design and Techniques for Measuring and Analyzing Plant Responses to Weed Control Practices. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: WSSA. Pp 29–46Google Scholar
Gealy, DR, Dilday, RH, Baldwin, FL, Black, HL (1999) Imazethapyr (‘Pursuit’) effect on red rice (Oryza sativa L.) biotypes. Pp 79–89 in Norman, RJ, Johnston, TH, eds. B. R. Wells Rice Research Studies—1998. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Agriculture Experiment Station, Series 468.Google Scholar
Goss, WL, Brown, E (1939) Buried red rice seed. J Am Soc Agron 31:633–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, JL, Baker, JB, Dunand, RT, Sonnier, EA (1986) Red rice control in rice and soybeans in southwest Louisiana. Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station Reports, Louisiana State University. Bulletin No. 776. 36 p. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1854&context=agexp. Accessed: April 8, 2018Google Scholar
Jia, Y, Gealy, D (2018) Weedy red rice has novel sources of resistance to biotic stress. Crop J 6:443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuk, YI, Burgos, NR, Shivrain, VK (2008) Natural tolerance to imazethapyr in red rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci 56:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L-F, Li, Y-L, Jia, Y, Caicedo, AL, Olsen, KM (2017) Signatures of adaptation in the weedy rice genome. Nature Genetics 49:811–814CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Y, Qi, X, Gealy, DR, Olsen, KM, Caicedo, AL, Jia, Y (2015) QTL analysis for resistance to blast disease in US weedy rice. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 28:834–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Londo, JP, Schaal, BA (2007) Origins and population genetics of weedy red rice in the USA. Mol Ecol 16:4523–4535CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noldin, JA, Chandler, JM, Ketchersid, ML, McCauley, GN (1999) Red rice (Oryza sativa) biology. II. Ecotype sensitivity to herbicides. Weed Technol 13:19–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Bond, J, Scott, RC (2013) Weed management practices and needs in Arkansas and Mississippi rice. Weed Technol 27:623–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Scott, RC, Smith, KL, Oliver, LR (2008) Response of northeastern Arkansas Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) accessions to glyphosate. Weed Technol 22:408–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottis, BV, Smith, KL, Scott, RC, Talbert, RE (2005) Rice yield and quality as affected by cultivar and red rice (Oryza sativa) density. Weed Sci 53:499–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantone, DJ, Baker, JB (1991) Weed-crop competition models and response-surface analysis of red rice competition in cultivated rice: a review. Crop Sci 31:1105–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, BA, Burgos, NR, Scott, RC, Bullington, JA, Shivrain, VK (2006) Baseline tolerance of red rice populations to glyphosate, glufosinate, and imazethapyr. Pages 213–219 in Norman, RJ, Meullenet, JF, Moldenhauer, KAK, eds. B.R. Wells Rice Research Series 2005. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Agriculture Experiment Station, Series 540Google Scholar
Rao, A, Johnson, DE, Sivaprasad, B, Ladha, JK, Mortimer, AM (2007) Weed management in direct-seeded rice. Adv Agron 93:153–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team (2017) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org. Accessed: March 12, 2018Google Scholar
Sankula, S (1997) Potential for Glufosinate as a Selective Herbicide for Red Rice Control in BAR-transformed Rice. Ph.D dissertation. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University. 144 pGoogle Scholar
Shivrain, VK, Burgos, NR, Agrama, HA, Lawton-Rauh, A, Lu, B, Sales, MA, Booyett, MA, Gealy, DR, Moldenhauer, KAK (2010a) Genetic diversity of weedy red rice (Oryza sativa) in Arkansas, USA. Weed Res 50:289–302Google Scholar
Shivrain, VK, Burgos, NR, Scott, RC, Gbur, EE, Estorninos, LE, McClelland, MR (2010b) Diversity of weedy red rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Arkansas, USA in relation to weed management. Crop Prot 29:721–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrestha, A, Hembree, KVa, N (2007) Growth stage influences level of resistance in glyphosate-resistant horseweed. Calif Agric 61:67–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr (1988) Weed thresholds in southern US rice, Oryza sativa. Weed Technol 2:232–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr, Flinchum, WT, Seaman, DE (1977) Weed Control in US Rice Production. Washington, DC: USDA Agriculture Handbook No. 497. 82 pGoogle Scholar
Subudhi, PK, Sasaki, T, Khush, GS, eds (2006) Genome Mapping and Molecular Breeding in Plants. Volume 1. Heidelberg: Springer Science. Pp 243–254Google Scholar
Tseng, TM (2013) Genetic Diversity of Seed Dormancy and Molecular Evolution of Weedy Red Rice. Ph.D dissertation. Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas. 145 p.Google Scholar
Tseng, TM, Burgos, NR, Shivrain, VK, Alcober, EA, Mauromoustakos, A (2013) Inter-and intrapopulation variation in dormancy of Oryza sativa (weedy red rice) and allelic variation in dormancy-linked loci. Weed Res 53:440–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA-ERS] U.S. Department of Agriculture-Economic Research Service (2017) Rice Yearbook. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rice-yearbook. Accessed: September 6, 2017Google Scholar
Vaughan, KL, Ottis, BV, Prazak-Havey, AM, Bormans, CA, Sneller, C, Chandler, JM, Park, WD (2001) Is all red rice found in commercial rice really Oryza sativa? Weed Sci 49:468–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, RC (2010) Towards understanding and use of mixed-model analysis of agricultural experiments. Can J Plant Sci 90:605–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziska, LH, McClung, A (2008) Differential response of cultivated and weedy (red) rice to recent and projected increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Agron J 100:1259–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar