Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T01:01:57.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Reintroduction to Integrated Weed Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Clyde L. Elmore
Clyde L. Elmore*
Affiliation:
Weed Science Program, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Integrated Weed Management (IWM), a long time practice by farmers has become more commonly discussed as a total weed management system. Whether an off shoot of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) or a further recognition of integrating weed control measures within the cropping and farming system, it has become more widespread. IWM is being practiced using many of the same components, from croplands to forests and rangeland. A weed management hierarchy has been developed by degree of diversity of management practices. IWM researchers and educators should invite other pest management specialists to join us in striving for Integrated Crop Management systems.

Keywords

Integrated Crop Managementweed control
Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Science , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 409 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Akobundu, I. O. 1991. Weeds in human affairs in Sub-Saharan Africa: implications for sustainable food production. Weed Technol. 5: 680–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Akobundu, I. O., and Ahissou, A. 1985. Effect of interrow spacing and weeding frequency on performance of selected rice cultivars on hydromorphic soils of West Africa. Crop Prot. 4: 71–76.Google Scholar
3. Barnes, P. W., Beyschlag, W., Ryel, R., Flint, S. D., and Caldwell, M. M. 1990. Plant competition for light analyzed with a multi species model. III. Influence of canopy structure in mixtures and monocultures of wheat and wild oat. Oecologia 82: 560–566.Google Scholar
4. Bridges, D. C. and Anderson, R. L. 1992. Crop losses due to weeds in the United States. In Crop losses due to weeds in the United States. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
5. Bhowmik, P. C. 1994. Biology and control of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). Rev. Weed Sci. 6: 227–250.Google Scholar
6. Buchanan, G. A. 1976. Management of the weed pests of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Pages 168–184 in Proc. U.S.-U.S.S.R. Symposium: The integrated control of the arthropod, disease and weed pests of cotton, grain sorghum and deciduous fruit, Lubbock, TX.Google Scholar
7. Caldwell, M. M. 1987. Plant architecture and resource competition. Ecol. Studies 61: 164–179.Google Scholar
8. Crutchfield, D. A., Wicks, G. A. and Burnside, O. C. 1985. Effect of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw mulch level on weed control. Weed Sci. 34: 110–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Dawson, J. H., Musselman, L. J., Wolswinkel, P. and Dorr, I. 1994. Biology and control of Cuscuta. Rev. Weed Sci. 6: 265–318.Google Scholar
10. Donald, W. W. 1994. The biology of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Rev. Weed Sci. 6: 77–102.Google Scholar
11. Edwards, C. A. 1987. The concept of integrated systems in lower input/sustainable agriculture. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 2: 148–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Elmore, C. L., Asai, W. K., Hendricks, L. C., and Elkins, R. B. 1989. Plant composition of orchard floors. Calif. Agri. 43: 18–20.Google Scholar
13. Elmore, C. L., Klonsky, K., Williams, W. W., and Steinmaus, S. 1995. Cultural management of vine row weeds in north coast vineyards. Abs. Weed Science Society of America. Seattle, Wash. p. 105.Google Scholar
14. Elmore, G. A. 1993. Soybean canopy effects on weed interference. . North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
15. Enache, A. J. and Ilnicke, R. D. 1990. Weed control by subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum) used as a living mulch. Weed Technol. 4: 534–538.Google Scholar
16. Forcella, F. and Randall, J. M. 1994. Biology of bull thistle, (Cirsium vulgare L.) tenore Rev. Weed Sci. 6: 29–50.Google Scholar
17. Holt, J. S. 1991. Applications of physiological ecology to weed science. Weed Sci. 39: 521–528.Google Scholar
18. Keating, B.A. and Carberry, P. S. 1993. Resource capture and use in intercropping: solar radiation. Field Crops Res. 34: 273–301.Google Scholar
19. Legere, A. and Schreiber, M. M. 1989. Competition and canopy architecture as affected by soybean (Glycine max) row width and density of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Sci. 37: 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Malik, V., Swanton, C., and Michaels, T. 1989. Impact of white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars, row-spacing and seeding rate on establishment and suppression of annual weeds. Ann. Report of the Bean Improvement Cooperative. 30: 81–82.Google Scholar
21. Midmore, D. J. 1993. Agronomic modification of resource use and intercrop productivity. Field Crops Res. 34: 357–380.Google Scholar
22. Mohler, C. L. and Teasdale, J. R. 1993. Response of weed emergence to rate of Vicia villosa Roth and Secale cereale L. residue. Weed Res. 33: 487–499.Google Scholar
23. Mosher, L. J. and Horak, . 1994. Shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) biology and management. Rev. Weed Sci. 6: 133–150.Google Scholar
24. Regnier, E. E. and Bakelana, K. B. 1995. Crop planting pattern effects on early growth and canopy shape of cultivated and wild oats (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 43: 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Regnier, E. E. and Stoller, E. W. 1989. The effects of soybean (Glycine max) interference on the canopy architecture of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), jimsonweed (Datura stramonium) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 37: 187–195.Google Scholar
26. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1988. Weed thresholds in southern U.S. rice (Oryza sativa) Weed Technol. 2: 232–241.Google Scholar
27. Teasdale, J. R. and Mohler, C. L. 1993. Light transmittance, soil temperature, and soil moisture under residue of hairy vetch and rye. Agron. Jour. 85: 673–680.Google Scholar
28. Thill, D.C., Lish, J. M., Callihan, R. H., and Bechinski, E. J. 1991. Integrated Weed Management—a component of Integrated Pest Management: A Critical Review. Weed Technol. 5: 648–656.Google Scholar
29. Valenti, S. A. and Wicks, G. A. 1992. Influence of nitrogen and wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars on weed control. Weed Sci. 40: 115–121.Google Scholar
30. Webster, T. M., Loux, M. M., Regnier, E. E. and Harrison, S. K. 1994. Giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) canopy architecture and interference studies in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 8: 559–564.Google Scholar
31. Wicks, G. A., Nordquist, P. T., Hanson, G. E., and Schmidt, J. W. 1994. Influence of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars on weed control in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Weed Sci. 42: 27–34.Google Scholar
32. Worsham, A. D. 1991. Role of cover crops in weed management and water quality. Pages 141–145 in Hargrove, W. L., ed. Cover crops for clean water. Soil and Water Cons. Soc. Ankey, IA.Google Scholar
33. Wyse, D. L. 1992. Future of weed science research. Weed Technol. 6: 162–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Wyse, D. L. 1994. New technologies and approaches for weed management in sustainable agriculture systems. Weed Technol. 8: 403–407.Google Scholar
35. Yunusa, I.A.M., Siddique, K.H.M., Belford, R. K., and Karimi, M. M. 1993. Effect of canopy structure on efficiency of radiation interception and use in spring wheat cultivars during the pre-anthesis period in a Mediterranean-type environment. Field Crops Res. 35: 113–122.Google Scholar