Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T11:51:32.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanisms of Resistance to Diclofop of Two Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Biotypes from the Willamette Valley of Oregon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Steven S. Seefeldt
Affiliation:
Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164
E. Patrick Fuerst
Affiliation:
Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164
David R. Gealy
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Stuttgart, AR 72160
Amit Shukla
Affiliation:
Dep. of Crop Sci. and Plant Ecol., Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5A8
Gerard P. Irzyk
Affiliation:
Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164
Malcolm D. Devine
Affiliation:
Dep. of Crop Sci. and Plant Ecol., Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5A8

Abstract

Laboratory experiments were conducted to determine the mechanism of resistance to diclofop in two wild oat biotypes (designated ‘B’ and ‘C’ biotypes) from the Willamette Valley of Oregon. Resistance could not be attributed to differential absorption, translocation, or metabolism of diclofop. Resistance was not correlated with membrane plasmalemma repolarization following diclofop acid treatment. Compared to a susceptible (’S') wild oat biotype, acetyl CoA carboxylase from the B and C biotypes showed a 10.3 and 4.5 fold increase in the level of resistance, respectively, to diclofop acid. Cross-resistance to fenoxaprop acid was 5.5 and 7.3 times higher in the B and C biotypes, respectively than the S biotype. Correlation between resistance at the whole plant level and at the ACCase level was good for diclofop and fenoxaprop in the B biotype. For the C biotype, this correlation was not as good. Possible reasons for the discrepancy are given.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Boldt, P. F. and Putnam, A. R. 1980. Selectivity mechanisms for foliar applications of diclofop-methyl. I. Retention, absorption, translocation, and volatility. Weed Sci. 28: 474477.Google Scholar
2. Catanzaro, C. J., Burton, J. D., and Skroch, W. A. 1993. Graminicide resistance of acetyl-CoA carboxylase from ornamental grasses. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 45: 147153.Google Scholar
3. Devine, M. D., Hall, J. C., Romano, M. L., Marles, M. A. S., Thomson, L. W., and Shimabukuro, R. H. 1993. Diclofop and fenoxaprop resistance in wild oat is associated with an altered effect on the plasma membrane electrogenic potential. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 45: 167177.Google Scholar
4. Gorbach, S. G., Kuenzler, K., and Asshauer, J. 1977. On the metabolism of Hoe 23408 OH in wheat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 25: 507511.Google Scholar
5. Gronwald, J. W., Eberlein, C. V., Betts, K. J., Baerg, R. J., Ehlke, N. J., and Wyse, D. L. 1992. Mechanism of diclofop resistance in an Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) biotype. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 44: 126139.Google Scholar
6. Hausler, R. E., Holtum, J. A. M., and Powles, S. B. 1991. Cross resistance to herbicides in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). IV. Correlation between membrane effects and resistance to graminicides. Plant Physiol. 97: 10351043.Google Scholar
7. Maneechote, C., Holtum, J. A. M., Preston, C., and Powles, S. B. 1994. Resistant acetyl-CoA carboxylase is a mechanism of herbicide resistance in a biotype of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana. Plant Cell Physiol. 35: 627635.Google Scholar
8. Marles, M. A. S., Devine, M. D., and Hall, J. C. 1993. Herbicide resistance in Setaria viridis conferred by a less sensitive form of acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 46: 714.Google Scholar
9. McFadden, J. J., Frear, D. S., and Mansager, E. R. 1989. Aryl hydroxylation of diclofop by a cytochrome P-450 dependent monooxygenase from wheat. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 34: 92100.Google Scholar
10. Powles, S. B. and Matthews, J. A. 1992. Multiple herbicide resistance in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum): A driving force for the adoption of integrated weed management. Pages 7587 in Denholm, I., Devonshire, A. L., and Hollomon, D. W. eds. Resistance '91: Achievements and developments in combating pesticide resistance. SCI, London.Google Scholar
11. Rendina, A. R., Felts, J. M., Beaudoin, J. D., Craig-Kennard, A. C., Look, L. L., Paraskos, S. L., and Hagenah, J. A. 1988. Kinetic characterization, stereoselectivity, and species selectivity of the inhibition of plant acetyl-CoA carboxylase by the aryloxyphenoxypropionic acid grass herbicides. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 265: 219225.Google Scholar
12. Seefeldt, S. S., Gealy, D. R., Fuerst, E. P., Brewster, B. D., and Appleby, A. P. 1992. Investigations of diclofop-methyl resistant wild oat (Avena fatua L.) biotypes from Oregon. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 32: 89.Google Scholar
13. Seefeldt, S. S., Jensen, J. E., and Fuerst, E. P. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol. 9: 218227.Google Scholar
14. Seefeldt, S. S., Gealy, D. R., Brewster, B. D., and Fuerst, E. P. 1994. Cross-resistance of several diclofop-resistant wild oat (Avena fatua) biotypes from the Willamette Valley of Oregon. Weed Sci. 42: 430437.Google Scholar
15. Shimabukuro, R. H., Walsh, W. C., and Hoerauf, R. A. 1979. Metabolism and selectivity of diclofop-methyl in wild oat and wheat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 27: 615623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Shimabukuro, R. H., Walsh, W. C., and Jacobson, A. 1987. Aryl-O-glucoside of diclofop: a detoxication product in wheat shoots and wild oat suspension culture. J. Agric. Food Chem. 35: 393397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar