Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:56:27.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Thifensulfuron Concentration and Droplet Size on Phytotoxicity, Absorption, and Translocation in Pea (Pisum sativum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kassim Al-Khatib ,
David R. Gealy  and
Chris M. Boerboom
Kassim Al-Khatib
Affiliation:
Northwest Res. and Ext. Unit, Washington State Univ., Mt. Vernon, WA 98273
David R. Gealy
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Pullman, WA 99164
Chris M. Boerboom
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse experiments were conducted to evaluate phytotoxicity, absorption, and translocation of thifensulfuron when applied to pea at different rates, droplet sizes, and as dry particles. Thifensulfuron rates that reduced shoot dry weight by 25% were 0.46, 0.59, 0.98, and 1.21 g ai ha-1 for droplet diameters of 110, 155, 300, and 450 μm, respectively. The 14C-thifensulfuron absorption as percent of applied increased twofold, whereas translocation decreased 36% as herbicide concentration increased from 18 to 146 mg L-1 in 980-μm droplets. Small droplets (50 μm) that dried to particles before contact with leaves did not damage pea plants. However, under dew conditions, dry particles damaged peas to a similar degree as liquid droplets. We concluded that small and concentrated droplets of thifensulfuron can damage peas more than large and diluted droplets as a result of increased herbicide absorption.

Keywords

Thifensulfuron, 3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylic acidpea, Pisum sativum L. ‘Columbia.’Droplet concentrationherbicide drift
Type
Special Topics
Information
Weed Science , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 482 - 486
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Al-Khatib, K., Parker, R., and Fuerst, E. P. 1992. Foliar absorption and translocation of herbicides from aqueous solution and treated soil. Weed Sci. 40:281–287.Google Scholar
2. Ambach, R. M. and Ashford, R. 1982. Effect of variation in drop make-up on phytotoxicity of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 30:221–224.Google Scholar
3. Bode, L. E. 1987. Spray application technology. Pages 85–110 in Methods of Applying Herbicides, McWhorter, C. G. and Gebhardt, M. R., eds. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Monogr. 4.Google Scholar
4. Boerboom, C. and Wyse, D. 1988. Influence of glyphosate concentration on glyphosate absorption and translocation in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 36:291–295.Google Scholar
5. Cranmer, J. R. and Linscott, D. L. 1991. Effect of droplet composition on glyphosate absorption and translocation in velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 39:251–254.Google Scholar
6. Hamilton, R. J., McCann, A. W., and Sewell, P. A. 1982. Foliar uptake of the wild oat herbicide flamprop-methyl by wheat. Pages 303–313 in The Plant Cuticle, Cutler, D. F., Alvin, K. L., and Price, C. E., eds. Linn. Soc. Symp. Ser. 10. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
7. Mathews, G. A. 1982. Droplets. Chapter 4. Pages 55–74 in Pesticide Application Methods. Longman Group, Ltd. London.Google Scholar
8. Merritt, C. R. 1977. Glasshouse trials with controlled drop application of some foliage-applied herbicides. Weed Res. 17:241–245.Google Scholar
9. Merritt, C. R. 1982. The influence of form of deposit on the phytotoxicity of difenzoquat applied as individual drops to Avena fatua . Ann. Appl. Biol. 101:517–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Merritt, C. R. 1982. The influence of form of deposit on the phytotoxicity of MCPA, paraquat, and glyphosate applied as individual drops. Ann. Appl. Biol. 101:527–532.Google Scholar
11. Prasad, R. and Cadogan, B. L. 1992. Influence of droplet size and density on phytotoxicity of three herbicides. Weed Technol. 6:415–423.Google Scholar
12. Smith, M. H. 1946. Quantitative aspect of aqueous spray applications of 2,4-D acid for herbicidal purpose. Bot. Gaz. 107:546–551.Google Scholar
13. Upchurch, R. P. 1958. The influence of soil factors on the phytotoxicity and plant selectivity of diuron. Weeds 6:161–171.Google Scholar
14. Wanamarta, G. and Penner, D. 1989. Foliar absorption of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:215–231.Google Scholar
15. Wolf, T. M., Caldwell, C., Mcintyre, G. I., and Hsiao, A. I. 1992. Effect of droplet size and herbicide concentration on absorption and translocation of 14C-2,4-D in oriental mustard (Sisymbrium oriental). Weed Sci. 40:568–575.Google Scholar