Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:49:14.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Pretreatment Environment on 2,4-D Phytotoxicity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. L. Darwent  and
R. Behrens
A. L. Darwent
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
R. Behrens
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Growth chamber studies were conducted to determine the influence of several pretreatment radiation, humidity, and temperature regimes on the response of peas (Pisum sativum L. ‘Alaska’) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic.) to foliarly-applied (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4-D). Under the conditions of these studies, growing peas under solar or fluorescent-incandescent lamp radiation, in high or low humidity, or in temperatures between 10 and 25 C prior to treatment did not influence their response to 2,4-D. The response of velvetleaf to 2,4-D was slightly greater when pretreatment growth was under solar radiation rather than under fluorescent-incandescent lamps. Similarly, high pretreatment humidities and temperatures produced slightly greater responses to 2,4-D in velvetleaf than low pretreatment humidities and temperatures. Herbicide uptake and translocation were greater when pretreatment pea growth was under solar radiation, but spray retention and rate of 2,4-D metabolism were not affected by pretreatment radiation. This study indicates that pretreatment light, temperature, and humidity conditions play only a minor role in determining the response of peas and velvetleaf to 2,4-D.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 20 , Issue 6 , November 1972 , pp. 540 - 544
Copyright
Copyright © 1972 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Behrens, R. and Morton, H. L. 1960. An environment system for plant studies with controlled temperature, humidity and light. Weeds 8:182–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Blackman, G. E. and Robertson-Cunninghame, R. C. 1955. Inter-relationships between light intensity and physiological effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on the growth of Helianthus annus . J. Exp. Bot. 6:177–211.Google Scholar
3. Darwent, A. L. and Behrens, R. Chambers to compare the sun and fluorescent-incandescent lamps as sources of radiation for plant growth. Can. J. Plant Sci. (In press).Google Scholar
4. Hammerton, J. L. 1967. Environmental factors and susceptibility to herbicides. Weeds 15:330–336.Google Scholar
5. Hull, H. M. 1958. The effect of day and night temperature on growth, foliar wax content, and cuticle development of velvet mesquite. Weeds 6:133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hull, H. M. 1970. Leaf structure as related to absorption of pesticides and other compounds. Residue Rev. 31:1–155.Google ScholarPubMed
7. Jaworski, E. G. and Butts, J. S. 1952. Studies in plant metabolism. II. The metabolism of 14C-labeled 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in bean plants. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 38:207–218.Google Scholar
8. Jeffay, H. and Alvarez, J. 1961. Liquid scintillation counting of carbon-14. Use of ethanolamine-ethylene glycol monomethyl ether-toluene. Anal. Chem. 33:612–615.Google Scholar
9. Jordan, L. S., Dunham, R. S., and Linck, A. J. 1960. Effects of interaction of varying temperature and light intensities on the response of flax to 2,4-D. Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 237: 28 p.Google Scholar
10. Kelly, S. 1949. The effect of temperature on the response of plants to 2,4-D. Plant Physiol. 24:534–536.Google Scholar
11. Mauldin, W. G., Muzik, T. J., and Robocker, W. C. 1966. Influence of thiamin on response of coast fiddleneck to 2,4-D at low temperature. Weeds 14:1–3.Google Scholar
12. Morton, H. L. 1966. Influence of temperature and humidity on foliar absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 2,4,5-T by mesquite seedlings. Weeds 14:136–141.Google Scholar
13. Penner, D. and Ashton, F. M. 1966. Biochemical and metabolic changes in plants induced by chlorophenoxy herbicides. Residue Rev. 14:39–113.Google Scholar
14. Prasad, R., Foy, C. L., and Crafts, A. S. 1967. Effects of relative humidity on absorption and translocation of foliarly applied dalapon. Weeds 15:149–156.Google Scholar
15. Still, G. G., Davis, D. G., and Zander, G. L. 1970. Plant epicuticular lipids; alteration by herbicidal carbamates. Plant Physiol. 46:307–314.Google Scholar
16. Went, F. W. 1957. The experimental control of plant growth. Chron. Bot. 17:1–343.Google Scholar