Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T19:57:14.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of in-row cultivation, herbicides, and dry bean canopy on weed seedling emergence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mario D. Amador-Ramirez ,
Robert G. Wilson  and
Alex R. Martin
Robert G. Wilson
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Panhandle Research and Extension Center, 4502 Avenue I, Scottsbluff, NE 69361-4939
Alex R. Martin
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, 279 Plant Science Building, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1996 and 1997 to evaluate the effect of EPTC (S-ethyl dipropyl carbamothioate) plus ethalfluralin at 2.4 plus 0.83 kg ai ha−1, rotary hoeing, in-row cultivation, rotary hoeing plus in-row cultivation, and dry bean canopy on weed seedling emergence. Cumulative weed emergence in 1996 and 1997 was similar in cropped and noncropped areas. Herbicides were more effective than mechanical cultivation in reducing weed emergence 91% in 1996 and 88% in 1997. Weed emergence was similar in both rotary hoed area and cultivated area in 1996 but weed emergence was 44% lower in rotary hoed plots than in cultivated plots in 1997. The Gompertz equation did not adequately predict weed seedling emergence in the untreated control and with in-row cultivation in 1996. Initial weed seedling emergence was observed at about 120 growing degree-days with 3 to 9% cumulative emergence among treatments. In 1997, the Gompertz equation adequately described weed seedling emergence in plots with or without disturbed soil. Weed emergence was first observed at 80 growing degree-days with 6 to 16% cumulative emergence among treatments. Predicted percent weed emergence closely approximated observed emergence in 1996 and 1997. Rotary hoeing plus in-row cultivation reduced maximum percent emergence rate 37% on an average. The greater maximum percent emergence rate obtained with in-row cultivation suggests that this treatment increased weed seedling emergence in 1997. On average, weed seedling emergence in the untreated check was lower in cropped areas than in noncropped areas, implying a competitive effect by the dry bean crop. Although weed seedling emergence occurred throughout the growing season, more weed seedlings emerged in June and early July than in late July and August.

Keywords

EPTC (S-ethyl dipropyl carbamothioate)ethalfluralinredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. AMAREcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. CHEALhairy nightshade, Solanum sarrachoides Sendt. SOLSAwild proso millet, Panicum miliaceum L. PANMIdry bean, Phaseolus vulgaris cvGreat Northern ‘Beryl’Nonlinear regressionpreplant incorporated herbicidesrotary hoeingundisturbed soilthermal time units
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , June 2002 , pp. 370 - 377
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Andersson, B. and Bengtsson, A. 1992. Influence of row spacing, tractor hoeing, and herbicide treatment on weeds and yield in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Swedish J. Agric. Res. 22:19–27.Google Scholar
Bahler, C., Hill, R. R. Jr., and Byers, R. A. 1989. Comparison of logistic and Weibull functions: the effect of temperature on cumulative germination of alfalfa. Crop Sci. 29:142–146.Google Scholar
Benech-Arnold, R. L., Ghersa, C. M., Sanchez, R. A., and Insausti, P. 1990. Temperature effects on dormancy release and germination rate in Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. seeds: a quantitative analysis. Weed Res. 30:81–89.Google Scholar
Benech-Arnold, R. L. and Sanchez, R. A. 1995. Modeling weed seed germination. Pages 545–566 In Kigel, J. and Galili, G., eds. Seed Development and Germination. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Brecke, B. J. and Shilling, D. G. 1996. Effect of crop species, tillage, and rye (Secale cereale) mulch on sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia). Weed Sci. 44:133–136.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C., Ahrens, W. H., Holder, B. J., Wiens, M. J., Johnson, M. M., and Ristau, E. A. 1994. Efficacy and economics of various mechanical plus chemical weed control systems in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technol. 8:238–244.Google Scholar
Egley, G. H. 1986. Stimulation of weed seed germination in soil. Rev. Weed Sci. 2:67–89.Google Scholar
Fidanza, M. A., Dernoeden, P. H., and Zhang, M. 1996. Degree-days for predicting smooth crabgrass emergence in cool-season turfgrasses. Crop Sci. 36:990–996.Google Scholar
Forcella, F. 1993. Seedling emergence model for velvetleaf. Agron. J. 85:929–933.Google Scholar
Forcella, F. and Banken, K. R. 1996. Relationship among green foxtail (Setaria viridis) seedling development, growing degree days, and time of nicosulfuron application. Weed Sci. 10:60–67.Google Scholar
Forcella, F., Eradat-Oskoui, K., and Wagner, S. W. 1993. Applications of weed seedbank ecology to low-input crop management. Ecol. Appl. 3:74–83.Google Scholar
Forcella, F., Wilson, R. G., Dekker, J., et al. 1997. Weed seedbank emergence across the Corn Belt, 1991–1994. Weed Sci. 45:67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, S. M., Doohan, D. J., Gordon, R. J., and Jensen, K.I.N. 1998. The effect of thermal time and soil water on emergence of Ranunculus repens . Weed Res. 38:405–412.Google Scholar
Hsu, F. H., Nelson, C. J., and Matches, A. G. 1985. Temperature effects on seedling development of perennial warm-season forage grasses. Crop Sci. 25:249–255.Google Scholar
Knake, E. L. 1972. Effect of shade on giant foxtail. Weed Sci. 20:588–592.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Horak, M. L., and Vanderlip, R. L. 1997. Relative time of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) emergence is critical in pigweed-sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] competition. Weed Sci. 45:502–508.Google Scholar
Limon-Ortega, A., Mason, S. C., and Martin, A. R. 1998. Production practices improve grain sorghum and pearl millet competitiveness with weeds. Agron. J. 90:227–232.Google Scholar
Mulugeta, D. and Stoltenberg, D. E. 1997a. Seed bank characterization and emergence of a weed community in a moldboard plow system. Weed Sci. 45:54–60.Google Scholar
Mulugeta, D. and Stoltenberg, D. E. 1997b. Increased weed emergence and seed bank depletion by soil disturbance in a no-tillage system. Weed Sci. 45:234–241.Google Scholar
Oryokot, J.O.E., Murphy, S. D., and Swanton, C. J. 1997. Effect of tillage and corn on pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) seedling emergence and density. Weed Sci. 45:120–126.Google Scholar
Popay, A. I. and Roberts, E. H. 1970a. Ecology of Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik and Senecio vulgaris L. in relation to germination behaviour. J. Ecol. 58:123–139.Google Scholar
Popay, A. I. and Roberts, E. H. 1970b. Factors involved in the dormancy and germination of Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik and Senecio vulgaris L. J. Ecol. 58:103–122.Google Scholar
Roundy, B. A. and Biedenbender, S. H. 1996. Germination of warm-season grasses under constant and dynamic temperatures. J. Range Manage. 49:425–431.Google Scholar
Santos, B. M., Bewick, T. A., Stall, W. M., and Shilling, D. G. 1997. Competitive interactions of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) and nutsedges (Cyperus spp.). Weed Sci. 45:229–233.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1996. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Cary, NC: Release 6.12.Google Scholar
Schweizer, E. E., Lybecker, D. W., and Wiles, L. J. 1998. Important biological information needed for bioeconomic weed management models. Pages 1–24 In Hatfield, J. L., Buhler, D. D., and Stewart, B. A., eds. Integrated Weed and Soil Management. Chelsea, MI: Ann Arbor Press.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J. and Murphy, S. D. 1996. Weed science beyond the weeds: the role of IWM in agroecosystem health. Weed Sci. 44:437–445.Google Scholar
Taylorson, R. B. and Borthwick, H. A. 1968. Light filtration by foliar canopies: significance for light-controlled weed seed germination. Weed Sci. 16:48–51.Google Scholar
Tipton, J. L. 1984. Evaluation of three growth curve models for germination data analysis. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 109:451–454.Google Scholar
Urwin, C. P., Wilson, R. G., and Mortensen, D. A. 1996. Late season weed suppression from dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars. Weed Technol. 10:699–704.Google Scholar
VanGessel, M. J., Schweizer, E. E., Wilson, R. G., Wiles, L. J., and Westra, P. 1998. Impact of timing and frecuency of in-row cultivation for weed control in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technol. 12:548–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitta, J. I. and Leguizamon, E. S. 1991. Dynamics and control of Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. shoot populations: a test of a thermal calendar model. Weed Res. 31:73–79.Google Scholar
Weaver, S. E., Tan, C. S., and Brain, P. 1988. Effect of temperature and soil moisture on time of emergence of tomatoes and four weed species. Can. J. Plant Sci. 68:877–886.Google Scholar
Wilen, Ch. A., Holt, J. S., and McCloskey, W. B. 1996. Predicting yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) emergence using degree-day models. Weed Sci. 44:821–829.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. G. 1988. Biology of weed seeds in the soil. Pages 25–39 In Altieri, M. A. and Liebman, M., eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Wortmann, C. S. 1993. Contribution of bean morphological characteristics to weed suppression. Agron. J. 85:840–843.Google Scholar