Sorghum halepense and Diseases
Invasive plant species often dominate native species in competition (Schwinning et al. Reference Schwinning, Meckel, Reichmann, Polley and Fay2017). Among invasive plant species, Johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.], a wild relative of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], is known as an aggressive invader of natural or minimally managed habitats (Sezen et al. Reference Sezen, Barney, Atwater, Pederson, Pederson, Chandler, Cox, Cox, Dotray, Kopec, Smith, Schroeder, Wright, Jiao and Kong2016).
After its introduction from the Mediterranean area into the United States in the 1800s, S. halepense was disseminated rapidly. By the late nineteenth century, its presence was almost nationwide, and its pernicious nature led to the first federal appropriation specifically for weed control in 1900 (McWhorter Reference McWhorter1971).
By competing for resources, through allelopathy, and by serving as a host for crop pests, S. halepense can greatly diminish crop yield (Soti et al. Reference Soti, Goolsby and Racelis2020); for example, heavy infestations of S. halepense reduced the yield of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in Mississippi 23% to 42% (McWhorter and Hartwig Reference McWhorter and Hartwig1972). While it is generally considered a problem in corn (Zea mays L.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), and sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) in tropical to temperate climates, 53 countries had reported it as a weed in 30 different crops by 1983 (Warwick and Black Reference Warwick and Black1983). Furthermore, in the United States, tens of millions of dollars are attributed annually to management costs and yield losses (Burke et al. Reference Burke, Wilcut and Cranmer2006).
Other concerns associated with S. halepense include the fact that weeds may be obligate alternate hosts for some pathogens, and herbicides used for weed control may interact with plant pathogens that might lead to a modified gene pool (Wisler and Norris Reference Wisler and Norris2005). Although S. halepense has been extensively studied in terms of its invasive properties and to discover potential methods of control, details about its diseases and potential roles as an alternate host for pathogens of major crops are lacking. We feel this review will be of interest to weed scientists, as it points out problems with earlier studies, especially as related to identification of species of pathogens, and the need and means that can be used to verify cross infection.
Sorghum halepense has been shown to serve as an alternative host for several insect pests of sorghum and corn, including sorghum midge [Contarinia sorghicola (Coquillett) (Diptera)], a leafhopper [Graminella nigrifrons (Forbes) (Homoptera)], and a corn leaf aphid [Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch) (Homoptera)] (Warwick and Black Reference Warwick and Black1983), and many of the insects harbored in S. halepense may serve as vectors for diseases of crops such as maize chlorotic dwarf virus (MCDV) and maize dwarf mosaic virus (MDMV) (King and Hagood Reference King and Hagood2003). However, in this review, we excluded information regarding insect pests other than those known to transmit viruses. Tables 1–3 summarize fungal, bacterial, and viral pathogens, respectively, that have been observed and verified to infect S. halepense and list other common hosts and common names of diseases caused by those pathogens.
Table 1. List of fungal and oomycete pathogens found in Sorghum halepense, common hosts, and common names or symptoms of diseases.
a Successful cross inoculation of isolates between host crop and S. halepense.
b Transfer onto S. halepense with an isolate from the host crop.
Table 2. List of bacterial pathogens found in Sorghum halepense, common hosts, and common name or symptoms of diseases.
a Successful cross inoculation of isolates between host crop and S. halepense.
b Transfer onto S. halepense with an isolate from the host crop.
Table 3. List of viral pathogens found in Sorghum halepense, common hosts, and common name or symptoms of diseases.
Fungal Diseases of Sorghum halepense
Compared with other classes of pathogens, many fungi have been reported as pathogens of S. halepense. While sometimes mentioned as potential biocontrol organisms, their presence usually identifies S. halepense as a potential alternate host to a non-weed species. Here we will first consider fungi, especially ascomycetes, known to have a wide host range, and then consider those that exhibit a high degree of host specificity.
Ascomycota
Macrophomina phaseolina
An example of a pathogen with a very wide host range is Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. Macrophomina phaseolina has no known sexual stage. However, it is classed as an ascomycete based on the presence of DNA sequences for mating-type alleles (Nagel et al. Reference Nagel, Wingfield and Slippers2018). It has been identified as the cause of charcoal rots in stem infections and damping off when roots are compromised for more than 500 wild and cultivated hosts, including S. halepense (Khan Reference Khan2007). Macrophomina phaseolina is widely present in soil and has been reported to cause yield losses of 30% to 50% in southern soybean production regions of the United States (McGee Reference McGee1992; Yang and Navi Reference Yang and Navi2005). In sorghum, up to 46.6% yield loss was recorded for susceptible plants with complete wilting and lodging (Arora and Dhurwe Reference Arora and Dhurwe2014). In a study in Australia, M. phaseolina has been isolated from the roots of symptomless plants of 23 weed species, including S. halepense (Fuhlbohm et al. Reference Fuhlbohm, Ryley and Aitken2012). In a recent study of genetic diversity of M. phaseolina in Senegal based on DNA sequences of five loci, internal transcribed spacer (ITS), translation elongation factor (TEF), actin (ACT), calmodulin (CAL), and tubulin (TUB), two clades were generated, but no consistent correlation was found among genotype, host, or geographic location, and isolates from both clades could even occur on the same host at the same location (Sarr et al. Reference Sarr, Ndiaye, Groenewald and Crous2014). Another recent study suggested that five Macrophomina species can be defined based on DNA sequence diversity among isolates collected from oilseed crops in Brazil (Machado et al. Reference Machado, Pinho, Soares, Gomes and Pereira2019). However, no indications for host specificity were described. Thus, while S. halepense could serve as a source of inoculum on occasion, it seems unlikely that it has a large impact on the overall spread of the crop diseases caused by Macrophomina.
Curvularia spp. and Bipolaris spp
Curvularia lunata (Wakker) Boedijn and Curvularia geniculata (Tracy & Earle) Boedijn have been isolated from typical leaf spot lesions of a wide range of hosts, including S. halepense (Pratt Reference Pratt2006). No clear indication of host specificity has been seen. In a test to examine host range, single spore cultures of C. lunata isolated from lesions of the pulse black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] were grown and used to prepare high concentrations of inoculum (Lal et al. Reference Lal, Kumar, Ali, Khan, Singh and Murti2013). When sprayed onto 30-d-old plants of 58 plant species in seven families, other than for the only three Euphorbuaceae species tested, at least one species in the other six families developed leaf spot symptoms. While S. halepense was not tested, corn and rice (Oryza sativa L.) were positive, but Sorghum vulgare (a synonym of S. bicolor) was negative (Lal et al. Reference Lal, Kumar, Ali, Khan, Singh and Murti2013). In other cases, C. lunata has been shown to cause leaf spot disease on grain sorghum in Pakistan (Akram et al. Reference Akram, Anjum, Ahmad and Moeen2014) and on sweet sorghum in China (Tong et al. Reference Tong2016), both of which are S. bicolor. Curvularia lunata is also often identified as a cause of grain mold in sorghum (Bandyopadhyay et al. Reference Bandyopadhyay, Mughogho, Satyanarayana and Kalisz1991; Prom et al. Reference Prom, Radwan, Perumal, Cuevas, Katile, Isakeit and Magill2017b). In corn, C. lunata is reported to cause approximately 10% to 60% yield losses and up to 33.4% losses in grain yield under hot and humid conditions (Bisht et al. Reference Bisht, Balodi, Ghatak and Kumar2018; DingFa et al. Reference Ding Fa1999).
Curvularia geniculata also causes leaf spot on corn and has previously been isolated from S. halepense (Hodges and Madsen Reference Hodges and Madsen1979). Moreover, C. lunata and C. geniculata are associated with leaf spots of Lacatan banana (Musa acuminata Colla) plants (Meredith Reference Meredith1963). In a recent study, C. geniculata was confirmed as the principal alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) foliar pathogen in the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul (Ávila et al. Reference Ávila, Dall’Agnol, Martinelli, Silva, Bremm and Nunes2017). Based on a survey conducted of seed-borne fungal diseases of rice in Burkina Faso, incidence rate of C. geniculata was 0.5% to 2% (Ouedraogo et al. Reference Ouedraogo, Wonni, Sereme and Kabore2016).
Bipolaris halepense Chiang, Leonard & Van Dyke was isolated from diseased leaves of S. halepense in North Carolina in 1989 (Chiang et al. Reference Chiang, Leonard and Van Dyke1989a). Conidia of B. halepense resemble those of Bipolaris maydis (Y. Nisik. & C. Miyake) Shoemaker, a foliar pathogen of corn, but B. halepense is only weakly pathogenic to corn and did not mate with fertile isolates of either mating type of B. maydis (Chiang et al. Reference Chiang, Leonard and Van Dyke1989a). Symptoms from B. halepense when found on S. halepense lack the zonate pattern, so are more typical for the lesions caused by Bipolaris sorghicola (Lefebre & Scherwin) Alcorn (Manamgoda et al. Reference Manamgoda, Rossman, Castlebury, Crous, Madrid, Chukeatirote and Hyde2014). B. sorghicola was found on S. halepense in La Plata, Argentina, and the diseased S. halepense plants were described as having leaf spots (Acciaresi and Mónaco Reference Acciaresi and Mónaco1999). Katewa et al. (Reference Katewa, Mathur and Bunker2006) inoculated conidia of B. sorghicola to sorghum cultivars ‘IS164’ and ‘SU 45’, and the reduction in grain yields was near 50% in both cultivars compared with the control.
Bipolaris sorghicola is reported to cause target leaf spot on barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), onion (Allium cepa L.), Arabidopsis thaliana spp., and sorghum (Peng et al. Reference Peng, Ge, He, Huang, Xu, Zhang, Shao and Guo2016).
In a 2006 report by Pratt, besides C. lunata, and C. geniculata, Bipolaris cynodontis (Marig.) Shoemaker, Bipolaris spicifera (Banier) Subr, and Exserohilum rostratum (Drechs.) Leonard & Suggs (formerly Bipolaris halodes) were also recovered from symptomatic leaves of S. halepense. In this case, the S. halepense was growing in association with Bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.]. Spores produced from cultures of the two Bipolaris species and E. rostatum were cross-infective to Bermudagrass, causing typical leaf spot symptoms (Brecht et al. Reference Brecht, Stiles and Datnoff2007; Pratt Reference Pratt2006). Bipolaris cynodontis has also been isolated from rice (Zehhar et al. Reference Zehhar, Touhami and Douira2008). In Bangladesh, the major pathogen of leaf blight in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is Bipolaris sorokiniana (Sacc.) Shoemaker, but other fungal species such as Bipolaris cynodontis (Marig.) Shoemaker, Bipolaris oryzae (Breda De Haan) Shoemaker, Bipolaris tetramera (Mckinney) Shoemaker, and Bipolaris victoriae (Meehan & Murphy) Shoemaker have been also isolated from infected wheat leaves (Momtaz et al. Reference Momtaz, Shamsi and Dey2019). Although it is not proven to cause severe disease, B. cynodontis was found in 10.4% of the rice seed lots from a total of 722 rice seed lots in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil (Meneses et al. Reference Meneses2014). As in the case of Macrophomina, even if S. halepense is a host for these pathogens, based on their extensive host ranges, it seems unlikely that it regularly serves as a major source of inoculum for this group of pathogens.
It is important to note that C. lunata refers to the asexually reproducing form (anamorph) of an ascomycetous fungus that also has a sexually reproducing form (teleomorph) in the genus Cochliobolus. Because identification of Curvularia based primarily on conidial morphology is not highly discriminatory, efforts are being made to use DNA sequence information to sort out the phylogeny of the group. Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp) lists 134 species of Bipolaris, 217 species of Curvularia, and 54 species of Cochliobolus, including C. lunatus, the presumed teleomorph of C. lunata. Several teleomorphs such as Cochliobolus heterostrophus (Drechsler) Drechsler are associated with serious diseases of specific hosts, including southern leaf blight of corn. When sequences of ribosomal ITS and a portion of the single-copy gene g3pd (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, including 2 introns) for 41 species defined as Cochliobolus were subjected to phylogenetic analysis, the results grouped the isolates into two clusters (Berbee et al. Reference Berbee, Pirseyedi and Hubbard1999). For 16 species in cluster 2, the classification, if based on asexual spores, would be either Curvularia or Bipolaris. All species in cluster 1 (14 Cochliobolus species) were associated with Bipolaris as the anamorph. Addition of TEF and the large-subunit rRNA (LSU) sequences led to further reclassification of morphologically defined species of Curvularia and Bipolaris (Manamgoda Reference Manamgoda2015). In these studies, isolates from sorghum were classified into seven different species, none of which was C. lunata (Manamgoda Reference Manamgoda2015; Marin-Felix et al. Reference Marin-Felix, Hernandez-Retrepo and Crous2020). Clearly, it will be important to use DNA sequence information to identify the species and to perform cross-species inoculation tests to determine whether Curvularia from S. halepense is a threat to neighboring crop species. The similarity of Curvularia and Bipolaris was not surprising, as each is known to derive from teleoforms of Cochliobolus. However, these observations show that isolates from different hosts described as separate species of Curvularia or Bipolaris in earlier literature may not meet today’s species definitions. It is also possible that some are anamorphs derived from genetically distinct species that do have host specificity. (At one time these fungi were all classed as members of the genus Helminthosporium and later Drechslera.)
Exserohilum spp
Exserohilum rostratum (or Setosphaeria rostatum when the name for the sexual stage is used), as stated previously, has been isolated from S. halepense and also appears to have a very wide host range. When E. rostratum isolates from banana were tested via assays using detached leaves from 128 different plant species belonging to 47 families, 60 developed leaf spot lesions. These included 17 of the 20 Gramineae tested, including corn (Lin et al. Reference Lin, Huang, Li, Hu, Fu, Qin, Ma, Xie, Cen and Yan2011). Exserohilum rostratum has been recovered from lesions on rice (Cardona and González Reference Cardona and González2007; Mahmad Toher et al. Reference Mahmad Toher, Mior Ahmad and Wong2015), and it also causes leaf spot on bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl.] leaves (Choudhary et al. Reference Choudhary, Sardana, Bhat and Gurjar2018) and pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr.] leaves (Luo et al. Reference Luo, He, Fan, Wang, Hua, Hu, Li, Liu and Yu2011). In July 2009, atypical symptoms of a leaf spot disease from which E. rostratum was cultured were observed on mature pineapple leaves in Chengmai County in China; approximately 15% of plants propagated from suckers became symptomatic after 150 to 300 d, eventually causing a 3% to 10% yield loss (Luo et al. Reference Luo, He, Fan, Wang, Hua, Hu, Li, Liu and Yu2011). Exserohilum rostratum has been implicated as causing root rot of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) (Alamri et al. Reference Alamri, Hashem, Mostafa, Nafady and Abo-Elyousr2019). Further, it is frequently mentioned as a pathogen in humans, as exemplified by Alajmi et al. (Reference Alajmi, Koratum, Khan, Ahmad, Jeragh, Ibrahim, Joseph and Varghese2019).
Based on results of greenhouse studies, a mixture of Drechslera gigantea (Heald & F.A. Wolf) S. Ito, Exserohilum longirostratum (Subram.) Sivan, and E. rostratum has been recommended as a biocontrol for S. halepense and six other weed species (Chandramohan and Charudattan Reference Chandramohan and Charudattan2001). The tests included inoculation of seedlings of six sorghum and six corn varieties as well as other garden and crop species that were all either resistant or immune. No follow-up reports on in-field applications were found.
Once again, the use of DNA sequence information, in this case from nine different regions, has led to significant reevaluation of Exserohilum spp. Most notably, E. rostratum was revealed as conspecific with other previously described Exserohilum species such as Exserohilum antillanum R.F. Castañeda, Guarro & Cano, Exserohilum gedarefense (El Shafie) Alcorn, Exserohilum leptochloae Y. Nisik. & C. Miyake, Exserohilum longirostratum (Subram.) Sivan., Exserohilum macginnisii A.A. Padhye & Ajello, and Exserohilum prolatum K.J. Leonard & Suggs. Isolates from sorghum still fell into seven different species, most commonly Exserohilum turcicum (Pass.) Leonard & Sugg. (Hernández-Restrepo et al. Reference Hernández-Restrepo, Madrid, Tan, da Cunha, Gené, Guarro and Crous2018).
Exserohilum turcicum is most widely known as the cause of northern corn leaf blight in corn (Chiang et al. Reference Chiang, Van Dyke and Chilton1989b). It is one of the most common and economically significant fungal leaf diseases of corn in the north-central United States and Ontario, Canada (Jindal et al. Reference Jindal, Tenuta, Woldemariam, Zhu, Hooker and Reid2019; Weems and Bradley Reference Weems and Bradley2017), and this destructive pathogen can reduce the grain yield of corn by more than 90% (Pant et al. Reference Pant, Kumar and Chauhan2000). Other studies have shown mixed results as far as host specificity of isolates. Reports describing recovery from S. halepense include Chiang et al. (Reference Chiang, Van Dyke and Chilton1989b), who found that S. halepense seedlings are susceptible to isolates recovered from Sorghum spp. (Sudan grass [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ssp. drummondi (Nees ex Steud.) de Wet & Harlan], S. halepense, and broomcorn [Sorghum vulgare Pers. var. technicum (Koern.) Jáv.]); S. halepense has been identified as an overwintering host (Levy Reference Levy1984). It can also provide a suitable medium in culture for crosses involving the teleomorph (Setosphaeria turcica) (Moghaddam and Pataky Reference Moghaddam and Pataky1994). Sorghum host differentials have been identified in India that show varying responses across locations, indicating that multiple pathotypes are present (Mathur et al. Reference Mathur, Thakur, Rao, Jadone, Rathore and Velazhahan2011). However, lack of cross infection between corn and S. halepense isolates has also been reported (Abadi et al. Reference Abadi, Perl-Treves and Levy1996). In one study, an E. turcicum originally isolated from S. halepense in Italy was inoculated to 40 varieties of cultivated sorghum, 25 hybrids of corn, and 5 varieties of durum wheat, bread wheat, oat (Avena sativa L.), barley and rice. Overall, only 15 varieties of cultivated sorghum showed a mild level of infection (Del Serrone and Fornasari Reference Del Serrone and Fornasari1995). In a similar study, a North Carolina isolate of E. turcicum that had been isolated from S. halepense caused moderate to severe damage to sorghum and corn (Chiang et al. Reference Chiang, Van Dyke and Leonard1989c). So, S. halepense may well act as a significant reservoir for E. turcicum.
Claviceps Africana
Sorghum ergot, caused by Claviceps africana Frederickson, Mantle & De Milliano, is a disease that replaces the seed on panicles of infected florets with sphacelia/sclerotia (Odvody et al. Reference Odvody, Montes, Frederickson and Narro-Sánchez2002). In India, losses of 10% to 80% have been reported in hybrid seed production fields, and ergot epiphytotics in Zimbabwe result in regular annual losses of 12% to 25% and occasionally in total losses (Bandyopadhyay et al. Reference Bandyopadhyay, Frederickson, McLaren, Odvody and Ryley1998). Although now global in nature, sorghum ergot was not known to be in the Western Hemisphere before 1995. After being reported in Mexico (Velasquez-Valle et al. Reference Velasquez-Valle, Narro-Sanchez, Mora-Nolasco and Odvody1998), it was later seen in Texas in the lower Rio Grande valley, where it was found in both sorghum fields and adjacent stands of S. halepense (Isakeit et al. Reference Isakeit, Odvody and Shelby2007). Because of the mild climate in the Rio Grande region, conidia can be produced year-round, providing a continual source of inoculum. Consequently, S. halepense has been suggested as a likely source of recurring disease (Odvody and Isaskeit Reference Odvody and Isaskeit1997; Prom et al. Reference Prom, Isakeit, Odvody, Rush, Kaufman and Montes2005), allowing annual spread throughout U.S. sorghum production regions as the growing season advances northward.
Sporisorium cruentum
In a greenhouse study, teliospores of Sphacelotheca holci Jack. [= Sphaceloiheca cruenta (Kühn.) Potter] (synonym to Sporisorium cruentum (Kühn) K. Vánky), that causes loose kernel smut in sorghum, infected S. halepense systemically after inoculation of cut stems (Massion and Lindow Reference Massion and Lindow1986). S. cruentum has been suggested as a biological control for S. halepense (Millhollon Reference Millhollon2000), but isolates from S. halepense also cause loose kernel smut in sorghum as reported by Dean (Reference Dean1966). Recently, a sample from S. halepense was shown to readily infect sorghum cultivar ‘BTx643’ plants (Prom et al. Reference Prom, Magill and Droleskey2017a), making any use to control S. halepense a potential problem for nearby sorghum. In Ethiopia, the incidence of covered kernel smut is estimated to be around 50% (Azanaw et al. Reference Azanaw, Gelaye and Kefale2020; Mengistu Reference Mengistu1982).
Colletotrichum sublineola
Before 1992 (and sometimes since) the species name graminicola was used to identify pathogens in the genus Colletotrichum that cause anthracnose on corn, sorghum, and other gramineae crops, with some isolates being identified as having restricted host specificity. However, based on differences between perfect stages (Glomerella) (Vaillancourt and Hanau Reference Vaillancourt and Hanau1992) and ITS sequencing (Sherriff et al. Reference Sherriff, Whelan, Arnold and Bailey1995), Colletotrichum sublineola Henn. ex Sacc. & Trotter 1913 (or sublineolum) is now used for isolates that infect sorghum. Sorghum halepense isolates of C. sublineola, have been shown to infect sorghum cultivars (Xavier et al. Reference Xavier, Mizubuti, Queiroz, Chopra and Vaillancourt2018). Conversely, under ideal conditions in a greenhouse, only inoculation at late growth stages of S. halepense led to infection by C. sublineola isolates originating from grain sorghum (Ahn et al. Reference Ahn, Odvody, Prom and Magill2020). In 1989, it was reported that C. graminicola extracted from S. halepense caused moderate to severe leaf damage on corn and sorghum; even oats and barley were slightly affected by this isolate (Chiang et al. Reference Chiang, Van Dyke and Leonard1989c). However, this was before the separation of the species names graminicola and sublineola in 1992, so the identity of the Colletotrichum isolate used in the study is not clear, nor is it known whether other species also can reproduce on S. halepense. In sorghum, losses caused by the panicle phase of anthracnose in terms of grain yield are generally 2% to 15% but may be up to 30% to 50% (Frederiksen and Odvody Reference Frederiksen and Odvody2000), so S. halepense and possible other alternate hosts do pose a potential threat for sorghum production.
Gloeocercospora sorghi
Gloeocercospora sorghi Bain & Edgerton causes zonate leaf spot on sorghum and has been recovered from S. halepense showing the same symptoms (Chiang et al. Reference Chiang, Leonard and Van Dyke1989a). Inoculation with an isolate of G. sorghi from S. halepense caused damage to corn and sorghum; mycelial growth and sclerotia appeared on incubated leaves of Sorghum spp. but not other species, which indicates that G. sorghi was compatible only with Sorghum spp. (Chiang et al. Reference Chiang, Van Dyke and Leonard1989c). Although the distinctive pattern of infection of sorghum leaves show it is a very common disease, it seems not to cause sufficient levels of yield loss to stimulate further research. Gloeocercospora sorghi has been tested as bioherbicide for S. halepense (Mitchell et al. Reference Mitchell, Njalamimba-Bertsch, Bradford and Birdsong2003), but the paper also pointed out it was highly virulent in other sorghums.
Ramulispora sorghicola
Oval leaf spot caused by Ramulispora sorghicola E. Harris was observed on sorghum and S. halepense near Beeville, TX, during August 2002 (Odvody et al. Reference Odvody, Rosenow and Black2006). The observation that rows of sorghum nearest to S. halepense displayed the same symptoms and that conidial cultures were found to reproduce the disease on both hosts implies that S. halepense was serving as a spreader. In winter months, oval leaf spot was mostly found on S. halepense, further strengthening the idea that S. halepense was the primary source. Because resistant sorghum cultivars are available, R. sorghicola has not led to significant sorghum yield losses (Odvody et al. Reference Odvody, Rosenow and Black2006).
Basidiomycota
A few fungal pathogens of S. halepense are categorized in phylum basidiomycota.
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani Kühn [teleomorph Thanatephorus cucumeris (A.B. Frank) Donk.], an undefined binucleate Rhizoctonia, and Rhizoctonia zeae Voorhees (teleomorph Waitea circinata Warcup & Talbot AG Z) were isolated from S. halepense growing in Turkey (Demirci and Eken Reference Demirci and Eken1999; Demirci et al. Reference Demirci, Eken and Zengin2002). Rhizoctonia solani is a soilborne plant pathogen with considerable diversity in cultural morphology, host range, and aggressiveness (Ajayi-Oyetunde and Bradley Reference Ajayi-Oyetunde and Bradley2018). Heterokaryon compatibility subdivides the species into 14 anastomosis groups that may differ in host range, several of which (AG-1A AG1B, AG4, and AG-5) have been isolated from corn (Li et al. Reference Li, Wu and Yan1998) and, except for AG-1B, from sorghum (Gao Reference Gao1987). AG-1 isolates are also pathogens of soybean, and soybean isolates have been shown to infect S. halepense (Black et al. Reference Black, Griffin, Russin and Snow1996). The R. solani that causes severe seedling damping-off up to 80% to 100% and final yield loss of up to 30% of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) worldwide belongs to AG2-1 (Kataria and Verma Reference Kataria and Verma1992; Khangura et al. Reference Khangura, Barbetti and Sweetingham1999; Sturrock et al. Reference Sturrock, Woodhall, Brown, Walker, Mooney and Ray2015; Tahvonen et al. Reference Tahvonen, Hollo, Hannukkala and Kurppa1984).
While R. zeae derives its name from a corn disease described in 1934 (Voorhees Reference Voorhees1934), it has also been reported to infect turfgrass in Florida, Ohio, and Ontario (Elliott Reference Elliott1999; Hsiang and Masilamany Reference Hsiang and Masilamany2007) and rice (Sifat and Monjil Reference Sifat and Monjil2017). More research is required to determine whether S. halepense serves as a source of Rhizoctonia diseases of crop species and, if so, which of the anastomosis groups are involved.
Sporisorium reilianum
Sporisorium reilianum (J.G. Kühn) Langdon & Full. (formerly Sphacelothca reiliana), the cause of head smut in sorghum and corn, may represent an exception where S. halepense is not a host. Yield losses attributed to S. reilianum are estimated to be as high as 80% in corn (Frederiksen Reference Frederiksen1977; Jin et al. Reference Jin, Li and Zhang2000; Yu et al. Reference Yu, Wang, Jin, Liu and Kan2014). Attempts to create infections using sporidia from cultures derived from teliospores collected from infected sorghum did not produce infection from spray, needle, or root-dip inoculation on any of several S. halepense cultivars tested (personal observations).
Bacterial Diseases of Sorghum halepense
More than 2,000 bacterial species have been reported as pathogens to more than 2,500 species of various plant hosts (Frederiksen and Odvody Reference Frederiksen and Odvody2000). Among them, relatively few bacterial pathogens are known to be harbored in S. halepense.
Clavibacter michiganensis
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. nebraskensis (Cmn), causal agent of Goss’s wilt of corn, sugarcane, and sorghum, can also infect S. halepense, which confirms that S. halepense may serve as alternate host (Ikley et al. Reference Ikley, Wise and Johnson2015). In this case, plants were inoculated with a sample originally from corn. Bacteria from resulting lesions were isolated and verified via Agdia® immunostrips specific for Cmn, and Koch’s postulates were fulfilled by showing pathogenicity on corn. Disease incidence in affected cornfields ranged from 20% to 60%, and significant yield loss was reported (Ruhl et al. Reference Ruhl, Wise, Creswell, Leonberger and Speers2009). Spread from S. halepense to corn or other crops could severely reduce yield.
Pseudomonas syringae
Pseudomonas syringae Van Hall was recovered from a lesion on a S. halepense leaf that caused circular to ellipsoidal, tan-orange-red to blackish-purple spots (Mikulas and Sule Reference Mikulas and Sule1979). Bacterial leaf spot has not been reported to be of widespread occurrence in sorghum, so control measures are not likely to be warranted (Frederiksen and Odvody Reference Frederiksen and Odvody2000).
Rickettsia-like Bacteria
Rickettsia-like bacteria (RLB) were consistently observed in KOH extracts of S. halepense stems collected in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] orchards with Phony disease. Although the RLB from S. halepense could not be cultured, it was antigenically similar to the RLB from infected peach trees, and its high incidence in orchards with Phony disease suggested a potential causal association through transmission via leafhoppers (Weaver et al. Reference Weaver, Raju, Wells and Lowe1980).
Xanthomonas vasicola
Xanthomonas vasicola pv. Vasculorum causes bacterial leaf streak in corn, and in a recent study, it was revealed that S. halepense is an alternative host of X. vasicola (Hartman Reference Hartman2018). That study also showed that cultivars of grain sorghum, oats, and rice also developed symptoms when inoculated with bacterial cultures grown from a corn isolate. The same bacterium is known to cause gummy disease of sugarcane (Hartman Reference Hartman2018). The impact of bacterial leaf streak on yield is not yet known, but it is not considered a major disease on crops (Byamukama et al. Reference Byamukama, Tande, Nampijja, Mathew and Bleakley2020).
Xylella fastidiosa
Xylella fastidiosa, a common bacterial pathogen that causes Pierce’s disease in grapes (Vitis aestivalis Michx.), was found in S. halepense in 1959 (Turner and Pollard Reference Turner and Pollard1959). More recently, inoculation of weed species with sharpshooter insects [Homalodisca vitripennis (Germar), formerly known as H. coagulate (Say); Xyphon fulgidum (Nottingham); and Graphocephala atropunctata (Signoret)] previously fed on infected grapes for 4 d found that 14 of 62 inoculated S. halepense plants maintained detectable levels of the pathogen, with systemic spread in two of the plants (Wistrom and Purcell Reference Wistrom and Purcell2005). However, an assay made the following year showed that many other weeds in almond [Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb] orchards in the same region also harbored X. fastidiosa, and in that survey, no positive tests were found on S. halepense (Shapland et al. Reference Shapland, Daane, Yokota, Wistrom, Connell, Duncan and Viveros2006).
The cost of Pierce’s disease in California is approximately $104.4 million yr−1 (Tumber et al. Reference Tumber, Alston and Fuller2014), so weed as well as insect control measures are warranted.
Viral Diseases of Sorghum halepense
A 1965 report of a virus found on S. halepense in California assumed it came from nearby sugarcane, and although it had some serologic cross reactions, it was found to be indistinguishable from maize mosaic virus (MMV) and in fact was not infectious to sugarcane (Shephard 1965).
Sorghum halepense Mosaic Virus
Johnsongrass mosaic virus (JGMV), now recognized as a member of a family of potyviruses, infects corn, sorghum, and S. halepense but not wheat or oat (Stewart et al. Reference Stewart, Willie, Wijeratne, Redinbaugh, Massawe, Niblett, Kiggundu and Asiimwe2017). The JGMV complete RNA genome sequence in GenBank is 9,779-bases long. While antibody-based tests can differentiate JGMV, SCMV (sugarcane), MDMV (maize dwarf), and SrMV (sorghum) as being antigenically distinct (McKern et al. Reference McKern, Whittaker, Strike, Ford, Jensen and Shukla1990), comparisons of the polyprotein or coat protein amino acid sequences show significant similarity to one another and also to Pennisetum mosaic virus (Laidlaw et al. Reference Laidlaw, Persley, Pallaghy and Godwin2004). JGMV does not show high similarity to MMV, which is larger, at 12,133 nucleotides. Recently, JGMV has been implicated as the sole (Stewart et al. Reference Stewart, Willie, Wijeratne, Redinbaugh, Massawe, Niblett, Kiggundu and Asiimwe2017) or as a participating (Redinbaugh and Stewart Reference Redinbaugh and Stewart2018) virus component in a disease called maize lethal necrosis, a serious emerging disease on corn in East Africa.
Maize Dwarf Mosaic Virus and Maize Chlorotic Dwarf Virus
Two major U.S. corn viruses, MDMV and MCDV, can also be isolated from S. halepense. A virus disease problem emerged in southern Ohio and surrounding regions in the 1960s (Stewart et al. Reference Stewart, Teplier, Todd, Jones, Cassone, Wijeratne, Wijeratne and Redinbaugh2014). MDMV caused up to 70% loss in corn yield globally since the 1960s (Kannan et al. Reference Kannan, Ismail and Bunawan2018). Similarly, MCDV is known to cause significant height (34% average) and yield reductions (72% average) (Louie et al. Reference Louie, Knoke and Findley1990). Spread of MDMV from introduced virus-infected S. halepense to adjacent susceptible corn in experimental plots was evaluated during 1979 and 1980 (Knoke et al. Reference Knoke, Louie, Madden and Gordon1983). Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the hypothesis that S. halepense control in corn causes increased MDMV and MCDV disease severity because of increased movement of insect vectors from dying S. halepense to the corn crop (Eberwine and Hagood Reference Eberwine and Hagood1995). In a follow-up study that took advantage of newer technology, reverse transcriptase sequencing reads made from RNA extracts of S. halepense and corn in the same region of southern Ohio, MDMV, MCDV, SCMV, SrMV, and MCMV sequences were found in both hosts, but JGMV was not detected (Stewart et al. Reference Stewart, Teplier, Todd, Jones, Cassone, Wijeratne, Wijeratne and Redinbaugh2014). MDMV was also detected on S. halepense in Oklahoma (Wijayasekara and Ali Reference Wijayasekara and Ali2017). In earlier studies, the leafhopper vector was allowed to acquire MCDV from corn or S. halepense source plants positioned in the center of corn plots. Results showed that spread from S. halepense was lower than if the insects fed on infected corn (Rodriguez et al. Reference Rodriguez, Madden, Nault and Louie1993).
Sugarcane Mosaic Virus
Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV), a causal agent of mosaic and dwarf mosaic on corn, sugarcane, and sorghum, was prevalent on S. halepense in marginal areas of cornfields (Mohammadi et al. Reference Mohammadi, Koohi-Habibi, Mosahebi and Hajieghrari2006). SCMV, which is considered as one of the top 10 most economically damaging plant viruses, reduces sorghum and sugarcane yields around 10% to 35% and corn yield around 20% to 50% (Braidwood et al. Reference Braidwood, Müller and Baulcombe2019; Rybicki Reference Rybicki2015; Viswanathan and Balamuralikrishnan Reference Viswanathan and Balamuralikrishnan2005; Zhu et al. Reference Zhu, Chen, Ding, Webb, Zhou, Nelson and Fan2014), so removing S. halepense around fields is warranted.
Oomycete Diseases of Sorghum halepense
Peronoscleospora sorghi
Sorghum downy mildew, incited by Peronoscleospora sorghi (Weston and Uppal) C.G. Shaw, has been known for almost 50 yr to be pathogenic to S. halepense (Amador et al. Reference Amador, Berry, Frederiksen, Horne, Thames and Toler1974). In 2000, it was observed on corn, sorghum, and S. halepense in Uganda (Bigirwa et al. Reference Bigirwa, Adipala, Esele and Cardwell2000). In that report, cross inoculation was demonstrated for spores taken from each host, but the symptoms were least on corn. However, within the southern epidemic zone in Nigeria, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Mozambique, and Rwanda, yield loss of corn was estimated to be 11.7%; individual fields had up to 95% incidence of systemically infected plants (Bock et al. Reference Bock, Jeger, Mughoho, Cardwell, Adenle, Mtisi, Akpa, Kaula, Mukasambina and Blair-Myers1998). Pathotypes of P. sorghi have been defined based on differences in host differentials in sorghum, but no similar tests have been reported for S. halepense.
Current Mainstream Technologies for Studying Diseases in Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense has been both a known and suspected reservoir of pathogens that have potential to cause diseases in other crops. Understanding of diseases of S. halepense that can potentially cross-infect agronomically important crops can provide valuable information for crop protection against the pathogens. Among four types of pathogens, fungal pathogens for other host plants were most frequently detected in S. halepense (Figure 1). As would be predicted based on their close phylogenetic relationship based on DNA sequencing, sorghum pathogens were more frequently found in S. halepense compared with pathogens of other crops. However, many of those same pathogens have also been found on other weeds, and only a few studies have been made since the advent of DNA-based sequence information, which can be used to more accurately define species or strains showing host specificity. Likewise, essentially no studies have investigated the infection process or reproductive cycle of pathogens of S. halepense. As a consequence, for most pathogens, the role of S. halepense as a reservoir remains to be investigated. Recent studies of based on real-time qRT-PCR analysis using primers designed for sorghum genes found upregulated defense-related genes in S. halepense when inoculated with C. sublineola (Ahn et al. Reference Ahn, Prom, Odvody and Magill2018). Although never directly applied to S. halepense, recent technologies such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) are expected to be applied in S. halepense to study diseases of S. halepense and their responses to various pathogens.
Figure 1. A pie chart that summarizes the proportions of the four categories of pathogens found in Sorghum halepense. Percentages displayed are rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent, and therefore do not total 100%.
Potential for Using Diseases of Sorghum halepense for Its Biological Control
As indicated earlier, several pathogens such as S. cruentum, G. sorghi, and a mix of three fungal pathogens (D. gigantea, E. longirostratum, and E. rostratum) have been studied or even recommended as biocontrol agents (Chandramohan and Charudattan Reference Chandramohan and Charudattan2001; Millhollon Reference Millhollon2000; Mitchell et al. Reference Mitchell, Njalamimba-Bertsch, Bradford and Birdsong2003). In some cases, the pathogens have later been found to cause disease in at least some cultivars of sorghum or, as in the case of G. sorghi, S. halepense was found to regrow after initial damage, a likely result from sprouting of rhizomes. Sorghum halepense rhizomes are known to allow pathogens such as MDMV to overwinter (Williams et al. Reference Williams, Findley, Dollinger, Blair and Spilker1966). Also, sorghum and S. halepense seedlings may contain high levels of dhurrin, a cyanogenic glucoside that may contribute to juvenile resistance to pathogens and insects (Ahn et al. Reference Ahn, Odvody, Prom and Magill2020). Consequently, use of plant pathogens for inoculation at multiple stages of plant growth may be required for confirmation. For example, when 21 and 26 S. halepense cultivars grown in a greenhouse were inoculated at the 8-leaf stage with C. sublineola isolates FSP35 and FSP53, respectively, which are highly virulent on sorghum, no lesion with acervuli formation was found (Ahn et al. Reference Ahn, Prom, Odvody and Magill2018, Reference Ahn, Odvody, Prom and Magill2020). However, when the same 21 S. halepense cultivars were inoculated post-heading with FSP35, high numbers of sporulating lesions were present (Ahn et al. Reference Ahn, Odvody, Prom and Magill2020). The appearance of symptoms does not guarantee pathogen reproduction has occurred and thus cannot be taken as proof of transmission in either direction, because avirulent strains of a pathogen, or even non-pathogens, may induce defense reactions that have visible symptoms, even though the pathogen does not produce infective propagules.
Potential for Leveraging Sorghum halepense Disease-Resistant Genes for Crop Trait Development
Based on real-time qRT-PCR analysis using primers designed for sorghum genes, S. halepense has been shown to upregulate defense-related genes, including chalcone synthase 8, thaumatin-like protein, and flavonoid-3′-hydroxylase, when inoculated with C. sublineola (Ahn et al. Reference Ahn, Prom, Odvody and Magill2018; Ahn et al. Reference Ahn, Prom, Odvody and Magill2019b). Bermudagrass southern mosaic virus (BgSMV), a nonpathogenic virus to S. halepense, triggered genes related to plant defense responses, including nonexpressor of pathogenesis related genes 1 (NPR1), peroxiredoxin, and S-adenosyl methionine synthase (SAM), to higher levels than in S. halepense plants inoculated with MDMV (Mostafavi et al. Reference Mostafavi, Sabbagh, Yamchi, Nasrollanejad and Panjehkeh2019). In sorghum, nonpathogenic fungi have been known to activate defense-related genes of sorghum with distinctive patterns that are comparable to patterns caused by pathogenic fungi (Lo et al. Reference Lo, Hipskind and Nicholson1999). Xavier et al. (Reference Xavier, Mizubuti, Queiroz, Chopra and Vaillancourt2018) reported that C. sublineola isolates collected from S. halepense are phylogenetically distinctive from the isolates collected from sorghum. Therefore, distinct patterns of defense-related gene expression are expected when sorghums are inoculated with C. sublineola isolates collected from S. halepense.
Sorghum halepense may provide a source of genes for resistance to pathogens. As a tetraploid that evolved from hybridization between S. bicolor and Sorghum propinquum (Kunth) Hitchc. around 96 million years ago (Paterson et al. Reference Paterson, Kong, Johnston, Nabukalu, Wu, Poehlman, Goff, Isaacs, Lee, Guo, Zhang, Sezen, Kennedy, Bauer and Feltus2020), S. halepense is expected to have duplicates of many genes, including resistance R genes that trigger response to effectors from a potential pathogen. Not only are there more R genes present, but it is likely that a change in an R gene in one genome would not lead to loss of response to a specific elicitor because of the orthologous gene in the other genome. While mapping of R genes has not been carried out in S. halepense, progress is being made in sorghum, in which DNA-based tags for R genes and defense response genes are being identified. In sorghum, GWAS have been used to identify defense-related single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to pathogens such as C. sublineola (Ahn et al. Reference Ahn, Hu, Perumal, Prom, Odvody, Upadhyaya and Magill2019a; Cuevas et al. Reference Cuevas, Prom, Cooper, Knoll and Ni2018; Prom et al. Reference Prom, Ahn, Isakeit and Magill2019) and E. turcicum (Ding et al. Reference Ding, Ali, Chen, Li, Mahuku, Yang, Narro, Magorokosho, Makumbi and Yan2015; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Fernandes, Kaiser, Adhikari, Brown, Mideros and Jamann2020). As more of these genes become identified, it will be interesting to compare both gene sequences and levels of expression following inoculation with a pathogen. It will also be interesting to identify putative R genes in S. halepense that differ from those in sorghum, as they could provide a source of ready-made resistance suitable for transfer to other crops, especially if the gene product can be shown to interact with a specific elicitor.
Future Research Directions
Diseases of S. halepense have not been extensively explored, and there are unknown pathogens of S. halepense as well (personal observations). Future research should take advantage of DNA sequence information for identification of species, and even pathotypes, when testing cross infection of potential pathogens that may transfer between major crops and S. halepense.
In summary, while S. halepense shares many pathogens with important crops, proof of a role in crop disease in many cases remains elusive. Factors that must be considered include:
-
1. Verification of the species causing disease in both hosts by successful cross inoculation and recovery, as backed up by DNA sequence information. This would also eliminate nearly identical pathogens that have developed host specificity through coevolution with the different hosts.
-
2. Because environmental conditions, including plant developmental stage, are critical for successful pathogen reproduction, tests must be made in conducive environments and at multiple stages of plant growth. In the meantime, eliminating S. halepense, especially stands growing near sorghum, is important.
Overall Lessons
Sorghum halepense is one of the most problematic weeds in the world due to rapid growth and wide dispersal of seeds and rhizomes. In addition, it is clear that S. halepense carries fungal, bacterial, viral, and oomycete pathogens that may infect other crops. However, in many studies, rigorous proof that it is the same pathogen is lacking, a problem that can now be addressed using DNA sequence information.
As for future research directions, possible suggestions include studies to identify possible genes for resistance, either broadscale or to specific races of fungal pathogens, which are areas that have not been explored because S. halepense is a weed. Despite the fact that diseases of S. halepense are not well studied, it is essential to understand that S. halepense could spread known and possible unknown diseases to other crops. Also, if it is possible to find strains of pathogens that heavily damage S. halepense but cause no/mild symptom(s) in other plants, it may be possible to use these pathogens as biocontrol agents. Further, genes from S. halepense that trigger hypersensitive responses to various pathogens may be useful in creating improved pathogen resistance in crops such as sorghum by interspecific crosses or gene transfer and editing technologies.
Acknowledgments
Support provided from AFRI, NIFA, USDA award no. 20156800423492. No conflicts of interest have been declared.
Open access
