Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T00:09:01.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dicamba, Chlorsulfuron, and Clopyralid as Sprayer Contaminants on Sunflower (Helianthus annuus), Mustard (Brassica juncea), and Lentil (Lens culinaris), Respectively

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Douglas A. Derksen
Douglas A. Derksen*
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Indian Head, Saskatchewan, Canada S0G 2K0
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Simulated sprayer tank residues of the broadleaf weed herbicides dicamba, chlorsulfuron, and clopyralid applied alone and with the grass weed herbicides sethoxydim and diclofop on sunflower, tame mustard, and lentil, respectively, caused visible crop injury and reduced dry weight and yield. Dry weight production in the greenhouse and crop tolerance ratings in the field indicated that the grass weed herbicides enhanced crop injury from dicamba, chlorsulfuron, and clopyralid. Yield reductions in field experiments were also greater when dicamba and clopyralid were mixed with grass weed herbicides and applied on sunflower and lentil, respectively. This did not occur with chlorsulfuron applied to mustard. When mixed with simulated broadleaf weed herbicide residues, diclofop enhanced dry weight reductions and crop injury and reduced yield to a greater extent than sethoxydim. Crop tolerance ratings differentiated treatments and rates but were not a good estimate of the extent of yield loss. When broadleaf weed herbicides were applied at rates simulating sprayer tank residues alone or combined with grass weed herbicides, yield losses ranged up to 40% in sunflower, 70% in mustard, and 95% in lentil, compared to the untreated check.

Keywords

Dicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acidchlorsulfuron, 2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]benzenesulfonamideclopyralid, 3,6-dichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic aciddiclofop, (±)-2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy]propanoic acidsethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one;sunflower, Helianthus annuus L.mustard, Brassica juncealentil, Lens culinaris MedikCrop tolerancecontaminationresidue
Type
Special Topics
Information
Weed Science , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , July 1989 , pp. 616 - 621
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baskin, A. D. and Walker, E. A. 1953. The response of tomato plants to vapors of 2,4-D and or 2,4,5-T formulations at normal and higher temperatures. Weeds 2:230–287.Google Scholar
2. Behrens, R. and Lueschen, W. E. 1979. Dicamba volatility. Weed Sci. 27:86–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Beyer, E. M. Jr., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. Sulfonylureas. In Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides; Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Vol. 3. Marcel-Dekker, Inc., New York. 1988. Pages 117–189.Google Scholar
4. Blackman, G. E. and Robertson-Cuninghame, R. C. 1955. Interrelationships between light intensity and physiological effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on the growth of Helianthus annuus . J. Exp. Bot. 6:177–211.Google Scholar
5. Comes, R. D., Marquis, L. Y., and Kelley, A. D. 1984. Response of concord grape (Vitus labrusca) to 2,4-D in irrigation water. Weed Sci. 32:455–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Derksen, D. A. Herbicide injury in special crops from sprayer tank residues. Proceedings-Soils and Crops Workshop. February 19–20, 1987. Univ. Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. 1987:650–656.Google Scholar
7. Douglas, D. W. and Thomas, A. G. 1986. Weed survey of Saskatchewan mustard, lentil, and dry pea crops. 1985. Weed Survey Ser. Publ. 86-2. Agric. Can., Regina. 157 pp.Google Scholar
8. Expert Committee on Weeds. 1986. Report of the Research Appraisal and Planning Committee, Western Section Meeting. Agric. Can., Regina. 298 pp.Google Scholar
9. Friesen, G. H. and Wall, D. A. 1986. Tolerance of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) to herbicides. Can. J. Plant Sci. 66:131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Gillespie, G. R. and Miller, S. 1983. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) response to diclofop. Weed Sci. 31:500–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Gillespie, G. R. and Miller, S. 1984. Diclofop interaction with MCPA and dicamba in sunflower. Proc.-West. Soc. Weed Sci. 37:174–183.Google Scholar
12. Greenshields, J.E.R. and Putt, E. D. 1958. The effects of 2,4-D spray drift on sunflowers. Can. J. Plant Sci. 38:234–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Thomas, A. G. and Wise, R. F. 1986. Weed survey of Saskatchewan sunflower fields. 1985. Weed Survey Ser. Publ. 86-1. Agric. Can., Regina. 50 pp.Google Scholar
14. Wax, L. M., Knuth, L. A., and Slife, F. W. 1969. Response of soybeans to 2,4-D, dicamba, and picloram. Weed Sci. 17:388–393.Google Scholar