Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-55tpx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-14T06:19:49.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative Phytotoxicity Among Four Arsenical Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. M. Sachs  and
J. L. Michael
J. L. Michael
Affiliation:
Plant Sciences Laboratories, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cacodylic acid (hydroxydimethylarsine oxide) was more phytotoxic than monsodium methanearsonate (MSMA), sodium arsenate, or sodium arsenite when foliarly-applied. MSMA was much more effective on dicotyledonous than on monocotyledonous species. Sodium arsenite and arsenate had little effect on grasses. A comparative study of absorption, transport, and metabolism in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L. ‘Black Valentine’) revealed that cacodylic acid and MSMA were transported about equally from the leaves to the terminal bud and expanding leaves whereas negligible amounts of sodium arsenite and arsenate were translocated. The latter two compounds caused more rapid contact injury to the treated leaves than either organic arsenical. There was no indication that cacodylic acid or MSMA was demethylated to form inorganic arsenicals or reduced to trivalent arsenic compounds. Studies with 14C-MSMA indicated that about 40% of the 14C and arsenic recovered was bound rapidly to another molecule to form a ninhydrin-positive complex. In small amounts, arsenate combined with some component of plant tissues. Also, arsenite probably was oxidized to arsenate. In beans, root-applied sodium arsenite was more phytotoxic than sodium arsenate and both were much more phytotoxic than cacodylic acid and MSMA. Most differences in phytotoxicity could not be explained by differences in rates of absorption by bean roots. Arsenite caused considerable contact injury to the root system, probably accounting for its relatively great phytotoxicity. Both cacodylic acid and MSMA were more phytotoxic per mole of tissue arsenic when foliarly-applied than when root-applied.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 19 , Issue 5 , September 1971 , pp. 558 - 564
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Benson, N. R. 1953. Effect of season, phosphate, and acidity on plant growth in arsenic-toxic soils. Soil Sci. 76:215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chan, T., Thomas, B. R., and Wakins, C. L. 1969. The formation and isolation of an arsenylated component of rat liver mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 244:2883–2890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Clements, H. F. and Munson, J. 1947. Arsenic toxicity studies in soil and in culture solutions. Pac. Sci. 1:151–171.Google Scholar
4. Crafts, A. S. and Robbins, W. W. 1962. Weed Control. 3d Edition, McGraw Hill, New York, N. Y. 660 p.Google Scholar
5. Duble, R. L., Holt, E. C., and McBee, G. G. 1969. Translocation and breakdown of disodium methane arsonate (DSMA) in coastal bermudagrass. J. Agr. Food Chem. 17:1247–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Ehman, P. J. 1965. Effect of arsenical build-up in the soil on subsequent growth and residue content of crops. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 18:685–687.Google Scholar
7. Emert, G. M. 1966. Arsenical distribution studies in rat liver sub-cellular fractions. Fed. Proc. 25:556 (Abstr. 2072).Google Scholar
8. Epps, E. A. and Sturgis, M. B. 1940. Arsenic compounds toxic to rice. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 4:215–218.Google Scholar
9. Frost, D. V. 1967. Arsenicals in biology-retrospect and prospect. Fed. Proc. 26:194–208.Google Scholar
10. Jacobs, L. W. and Keeney, D. R. 1970. Arsenic-phosphorus interactions in corn. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1:85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Juska, F. V. 1961. Preemergence herbicides for crabgrass control and their effects on germination of turfgrass species. Weeds 9:137–144.Google Scholar
12. Rumberg, C. B., Engel, R. E., and Meggitt, W. F. 1960. Effect of temperature on the herbicidal activity and translocation of arsenicals. Weeds 8:582–588.Google Scholar
13. Sachs, R. M., Michael, J. L., Anastasia, F. B., and Wells, W. A. 1971. Methods for extraction, chromatographic separation, and quantitative determination of arsenical herbicides in plant tissues. Weed Sci. 19: (in press).Google Scholar
14. Sckerl, M. M. and Frans, R. E. 1969. Translocation and metabolism of MAA-14C in johnsongrass and cotton. Weed Sci. 17:421–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Singh, R. K. N. and Campbell, R. W. 1958. Herbicides on bluegrass. Weeds 13:9–10.Google Scholar
16. Skogley, C. R. and Ahlgren, G. H. 1955. Preliminary report on the use of several new arsenicals. Proc. No. East. Weed Contr. Conf. 9:401–405.Google Scholar
17. Story, G. E. 1966. In vivo valence studies of urinary and haemoglobin arsenic. Fed. Proc. 25:556 (Abstr. 2071).Google Scholar
18. Thom, C. and Raper, K. R. 1932. The arsenic fungi of Gosio. Science 76:548–550.Google Scholar
19. Thuret, M. J. 1939. La transformation en oxyde d'-arsine des composes arsenicaux au contact de la cellule hepatique. J. Pharm. Chim. 29:5–11.Google Scholar
20. Von Endt, D. W., Kearney, P. C., and Kaufman, D. D. 1968. Degradation of monosodium methanearsonic acid by soil microorganisms. J. Agr. Food Chem. 16:17–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Webb, J. L. 1966. Enzyme and Metabolic Inhibitors. Vol. III. Academic Press, N. Y. 1083 p.Google Scholar