Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:58:31.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alachlor and Metribuzin Movement and Dissipation in a Soil Profile as Influenced by Soil Surface Condition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ronald E. Jones Jr. ,
Philip A. Banks  and
David E. Radcliffe
Ronald E. Jones Jr.
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
Philip A. Banks
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
David E. Radcliffe
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The influence of wheat straw cover, tillage, and irrigation on metribuzin and alachlor movement and dissipation in an Appling coarse sandy loam (Typic Hapludult) and the influence of soil depth on their rate of dissipation were measured in field and laboratory experiments conducted in 1987 and 1988. Overall, metribuzin moved more than alachlor in both years. Alachlor movement was greater in tilled plots compared to no-till plots in 1988. Metribuzin movement was greater in no-till plots in 1987. Straw cover had little effect on the movement of alachlor, but the presence of 2800 kg ha−1 of straw on the soil surface increased the downward movement of metribuzin in both years compared to soil with no straw cover. The rate of alachlor dissipation in the soil was faster in straw-covered and no-till plots in both years and in the high irrigation level in 1988. Metribuzin dissipation was not affected by any of these factors. Alachlor rate of dissipation did not differ among depths in the field; however, dissipation differed in the laboratory in the order 0 to 20 cm > 20 to 45 cm = 45 to 68 cm. Metribuzin dissipated faster at the 8-cm depth in the field compared to the 58-cm depth. In the laboratory, metribuzin dissipation rates followed the order 0 to 20 cm > 20 to 45 cm > 45 to 68 cm. At the greatest depth, the dissipation of metribuzin was faster in the field than in the laboratory.

Keywords

Wheat, Triticum aestivum L.alachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)acetamidemetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-oneHerbicide degradationherbicide dissipationleachingmicrobial degradationirrigationno-tillstraw covertillage
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 38 , Issue 6 , November 1990 , pp. 589 - 597
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Adriano, D. C. and Doner, H. E. 1982. Bromine, chlorine, and fluorine. Pages 449–483 in Page, A. L., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Am. Soc. Agron. and Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
2. Anderson, J.P.E. 1981. Soil moisture and the rates of biodegradation of diallate and triallate. Soil Biol. Biochem. 13:155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Ball, B. C. 1981. Pore characteristics of soils from two cultivation experiments as shown by gas diffusivities and permeabilities and air-filled porosities. J. Soil Sci. 32:483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Ballerstedt, P. J. 1983. Behavior and fate of alachlor and metribuzin in Georgia soils. Master's Thesis. Univ. Georgia, Athens, GA.Google Scholar
5. Banks, P. A. and Robinson, E. L. 1982. The influence of straw mulch on the soil reception and persistence of metribuzin. Weed Sci. 30:164–168.Google Scholar
6. Banks, P. A. and Robinson, E. L. 1984. The fate of oryzalin applied to straw-mulched and nonmulched soils. Weed Sci. 32:269–272.Google Scholar
7. Banks, P. A. and Robinson, E. L. 1986. Soil reception and activity of acetochlor, alachlor, and metolachlor as affected by wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw and irrigation. Weed Sci. 34:607–611.Google Scholar
8. Barnes, B. T. and Ellis, F. B. 1979. Effects of different methods of cultivation and direct drilling, and disposal of straw residues on populations of earthworms. J. Soil Sci. 30:669–679.Google Scholar
9. Beestman, G. B. and Deming, J. M. 1974. Dissipation of acetanilide herbicides from soils. Agron. J. 66:308–311.Google Scholar
10. Bouchard, D. C. 1982. Fate of metribuzin in soil. Weed Sci. 30:629–632.Google Scholar
11. Bouma, J., Belmans, C., Dekker, L. W., and Jeurissen, W.J.M. 1983. Assessing the suitability of soils with macropores for subsurface liquid waste disposal. J. Environ. Qual. 12:305–311.Google Scholar
12. Doran, J. W. 1980. Soil microbial and biochemical changes associated with reduced tillage. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44:765–771.Google Scholar
13. Douglas, J. T., Goss, M. J., and Hill, D. 1980. Measurements of pore characteristics in a clay soil under ploughing and direct drilling, including use of a radioactive tracer (144Ce) technique. Soil & Tillage Res. 1:11–18.Google Scholar
14. Dowdell, R. J., Crees, R., Burford, J. R., and Cannell, R. Q. 1979. Oxygen concentrations in a clay soil after ploughing or direct drilling. J. Soil Sci. 30:239–245.Google Scholar
15. Ehlers, W. 1975. Observations on earthworm channels and infiltration on tilled and untilled loess soil. Soil Sci. 119:242–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Ellis, F. B., Elliott, J. O., Pollard, F., Cannel, R. Q., and Barnes, B. T. 1979. Comparison of direct drilling, reduced cultivation and ploughing on the growth of cereals. 3. Winter wheat and spring barley on a calcareous clay. J. Agric. Sci. 93:391–401.Google Scholar
17. Eshel, Y. 1969. Phytotoxicity, leachability, and site of uptake of 2-chloro-2′6′-ethyl-N-(methoxymethyl)acetanilide. Weed Sci. 17:441–444.Google Scholar
18. Focht, D. D. and Joseph, H. 1973. An improved method for the enumeration of denitrifying bacteria. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 37:698–699.Google Scholar
19. Gomez, A. K. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 680 p.Google Scholar
20. Hance, R. J. and Haynes, R. A. 1981. The kinetics of linuron and metribuzin decomposition in soil using different laboratory systems. Weed Res. 21:87–92.Google Scholar
21. Hargrove, R. S. and Merkle, M. G. 1971. The loss of alachlor from soil. Weed Sci. 19:652–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Harris, C. I., Woolson, E. A., and Hummer, B. E. 1969. Dissipation of herbicides at three soil depths. Weed Sci. 17:27–31.Google Scholar
23. Hurle, K. and Walker, A. 1980. Persistence and its prediction. Pages 83–122 in Hance, R. J., ed. Interactions Between Herbicides and the Soil. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
24. Jones, J. N., Moody, J. E., and Lillard, J. H. 1969. Effects of tillage, no tillage, and mulch on soil water and plant growth. Agron. J. 61:719–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Ladlie, J. S., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1976. Effect of soil pH on microbial degradation, adsorption, and mobility of metribuzin. Weed Sci. 24:477–481.Google Scholar
26. Ladlie, J. S., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1976. Role of pH on metribuzin dissipation in field soils. Weed Sci. 24:508–511.Google Scholar
27. Lay, M. M. and Ilnicki, R. D. 1975. Effect of soil storage on propanil degradation. Weed Res. 15:63–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Leistra, M. and Smelt, J. H. 1981. Movement and conversion of ethoprophos in soil in winter: 2. computer simulation. Soil Sci. 131:296–302.Google Scholar
29. Leland, D. F. and Hillel, D. 1982. A field study of solute dispersion in a shallow, unconfined aquifer. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46:905–912.Google Scholar
30. Linn, D. M. and Doran, J. W. 1984. Aerobic and anaerobic microbial populations in no-till and plowed soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48:794–799.Google Scholar
31. Nicholls, P. H., Walker, A., and Baker, R. J. 1982. Measurement and simulation of the movement and degradation of atrazine and metribuzin in a fallow soil. Pestic. Sci. 13:484–494.Google Scholar
32. Ogle, R. E. and Warren, G. F. 1954. Fate and activity of herbicides in soil. Weeds 3:257–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Savage, K. E. 1976. Adsorption and mobility of metribuzin in soil. Weed Sci. 24:525–528.Google Scholar
34. Savage, K. E. 1977. Metribuzin persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 25:55–59.Google Scholar
35. Sharom, M. S. and Stephenson, G. R. 1976. Behavior and fate of metribuzin in eight Ontario soils. Weed Sci. 24:153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Slack, C. H., Blevins, R. L., and Rieck, C. E. 1978. Effect of soil pH and tillage on persistence of simazine. Weed Sci. 26:145–148.Google Scholar
37. Smith, D. T. and Meggitt, W. F. 1970. Persistence and degradation of pyrazon in soil. Weed Sci. 18:260–264.Google Scholar
38. Suzuki, T., Tokunaga, Y., and Watanabe, I. 1969. Effect of different tillage operations on microbial properties of soil layers. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 15:280–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Tollner, E. W., Hargrove, W. L., and Langdale, G. W. 1984. Influence of conventional and no-till practices on soil physical properties in the Southern Piedmont. J. Soil Water Conserv. 39:73–76.Google Scholar
40. Triplett, G. B. Jr., VanDoren, D. M. Jr., and Schmidt, B. L. 1968. Effect of corn stover mulch on no-tillage corn yield and water infiltration. Agron. J. 60:236–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41. Unger, P. W. and Parker, J. J. Jr. 1968. Residue placement effects on decomposition, evaporation, and soil moisture distribution. Agron. J. 60:469–472.Google Scholar
42. Walker, A. 1978. Simulation of the persistence of eight soil-applied herbicides. Weed Res. 18:305–313.Google Scholar
43. Walker, A., Brown, P. A., and Matthews, P. R. 1985. Persistence and phototoxicity of napropamide residues in soil. Ann. Appl. Biol. 106:323–333.Google Scholar
44. Walker, A., Hance, R. J., Allen, J. G., Briggs, G. G., Chen, Yuh-Lin, Gaynor, J. D., Hogue, E. J., Malquori, A., Moody, K., Moyer, J. R., Pestemer, W., Rahman, A., Smith, A. E., Stiebig, J. C., Torstensson, N.T.L., Widyanto, L. S., and Zandvoort, R. 1983. EWRS Herbicide-Soil Working Group: collaborative experiment on simazine persistence in soil. Weed Res. 23:373–383.Google Scholar
45. Weber, J. B. and Peter, C. J. 1982. Adsorption, bioactivity, and evaluations of soil tests for alachlor, acetochlor, and metolachlor. Weed Sci. 30:14–20.Google Scholar
46. Weed Science Society of America. 1983. Herbicide Handbook. 5th ed. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL. 515 pp.Google Scholar
47. Wu, T. L. 1980. Dissipation of the herbicides atrazine and alachlor in ai Maryland corn field. J. Environ. Qual. 9:459–465.Google Scholar