Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-hb754 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-03T22:39:58.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Winter survival of late emerging purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) seedlings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Roger L. Becker
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Jane L. Byron
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108


In wetlands, drought or managed late-summer drawdowns create exposed mudflats that provide an excellent substrate for germination of purple loosestrife seeds. If late-emerging purple loosestrife seedlings survive the winter, new or expanding populations of purple loosestrife will result. Spring survival was determined for overwintered purple loosestrife seedlings from seeds planted at weekly intervals in late summer or fall of the previous year. Seedlings of purple loosestrife that emerged from late July to early August had the greatest survival rates and the greatest shoot dry weight, and they were the tallest the following spring. However, 37% of purple loosestrife seedlings that emerged in late August, although stunted, generated a crown that was able to overwinter successfully and regrow the following spring. The number of growing degree days accumulated from planting date to October 6 (the average date of first frost for Minneapolis and St. Paul, MN) was 1,424 for seedlings from seeds planted on July 21 but only 219 for seedlings from seeds planted on September 15. Purple loosestrife seedlings that emerge during late summer through early September in Minnesota may survive the winter to create additional purple loosestrife weed problems in wetland mudflats caused by artificial drawdowns or droughts.

Research Article
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Literature Cited

Climatology Working Group. 2001. Agricultural Climate Information. Available at, University of Minnesota. Accessed: October 2001.Google Scholar
Harris, S. W. and Marshall, W. H. 1963. Ecology of water-level manipulations on a northern marsh. Ecology. 44:331343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haworth-Brockman, M. J. and Murkin, H. R. 1993. Effects of shallow flooding on newly established purple loosestrife seedlings. Wetlands 13:224227.Google Scholar
Kadlec, J. A. 1962. Effects of a drawdown on a waterfowl impoundment. Ecology. 43:267281.Google Scholar
Keddy, P. A. and Ellis, T. H. 1985. Seedling recruitment of 11 wetland plant species along a water level gradient: shared or distinct responses? Can. J. Bot. 63:18761879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merendino, M. T., Smith, L. M., Murkin, H. R., and Pederson, R. L. 1990. The response of prairie wetland vegetation to seasonality of drawdown. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 18:245251.Google Scholar
Mal, T. K., Lovett-Doust, J., and Mulligan, G. A. 1992. The biology of Canadian weeds. 100. Lythrum salicaria . Can. J. Plant Sci. 72:13051306.Google Scholar
Ransom, C. V., Kells, J. J., Wax, L. M., and Orfanedes, M. S. 1998. Morphological variation among hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) populations. Weed Sci. 46:7175.Google Scholar
Rawinski, T. J. and Malecki, R. A. 1984. Ecological relationships among purple loosestrife, cattail and wildlife at the Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge. N. Y. Fish Game J. 31:8187.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. J., Blad, B. L., and Verma, S. B. 1983. Microclimate, the Biological Environment. New York: J. Wiley. 374 p.Google Scholar
Shamsi, S.R.A. and Whitehead, F. H. 1974a. Comparative eco-physiology of Epilobium hirsutum L. and Lythrum salicaria L. I. General biology, distribution and germination. J. Ecol. 62:279290.Google Scholar
Shamsi, S.R.A. and Whitehead, F. H. 1974b. Comparative eco-physiology of Epilobium hirsutum L. and Lythrum salicaria L. II. Growth and development in relation to light. J. Ecol. 62:631645.Google Scholar
Sharratt, B. S., Baker, D. G., and Sheaffer, C. C. 1987. Environmental guide to alfalfa growth, water use, and yield in Minnesota. Minn. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 581.Google Scholar
Sharratt, B. S., Sheaffer, C. C., and Baker, D. G. 1989. Base temperature for the application of the growing-degree day model to field-grown alfalfa. Field Crops Res. 21:95102.Google Scholar
Smith, L. S. 1959. Some experiences with control of purple loosestrife at the Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge. Proc. Northeast. Weed Control Conf. 13:333336.Google Scholar
Smith, R. H. 1964. Experimental control of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). N. Y. Fish Game J. 11:3546.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. Q., Stuckey, R. L., and Thompson, E. B. 1987. Impact and Control of Purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North American Wetlands. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Washington, D.C. Research Rep. No. 2. 55 pp.Google Scholar
Welling, C. H. and Becker, R. L. 1990. Seed bank dynamics of Lythrum salicaria L.: implications for control of this species in North America. Aquat. Bot. 38:303309.Google Scholar
Welling, C. H. and Becker, R. L. 1993. Reduction of purple loosestrife establishment in Minnesota wetlands. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 21:5664.Google Scholar