Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-qj5tk Total loading time: 0.292 Render date: 2022-07-03T00:56:10.049Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Long-Term Management of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Dicamba-Tolerant Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Matthew D. Inman
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
David L. Jordan*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Alan C. York
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Katie M. Jennings
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
David W. Monks
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
Wesley J. Everman
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Scott L. Bollman
Affiliation:
Monsanto Co., St. Louis, MO 63167
John T. Fowler
Affiliation:
Monsanto Co., St. Louis, MO 63167
Richard M. Cole
Affiliation:
Monsanto Co., St. Louis, MO 63167
John K. Soteres
Affiliation:
Monsanto Co., St. Louis, MO 63167
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: david_jordan@ncsu.edu.

Abstract

Research was conducted from 2011 to 2014 to determine weed population dynamics and frequency of glyphosate-resistant (GR) Palmer amaranth with herbicide programs consisting of glyphosate, dicamba, and residual herbicides in dicamba-tolerant cotton. Five treatments were maintained in the same plots over the duration of the experiment: three sequential POST applications of glyphosate with or without pendimethalin plus diuron PRE; three sequential POST applications of glyphosate plus dicamba with and without the PRE herbicides; and a POST application of glyphosate plus dicamba plus acetochlor followed by one or two POST applications of glyphosate plus dicamba without PRE herbicides. Additional treatments included alternating years with three sequential POST applications of glyphosate only and glyphosate plus dicamba POST with and without PRE herbicides. The greatest population of Palmer amaranth was observed when glyphosate was the only POST herbicide throughout the experiment. Although diuron plus pendimethalin PRE in a program with only glyphosate POST improved control during the first 2 yr, these herbicides were ineffective by the final 2 yr on the basis of weed counts from soil cores. The lowest population of Palmer amaranth was observed when glyphosate plus dicamba were applied regardless of PRE herbicides or inclusion of acetochlor POST. Frequency of GR Palmer amaranth was 8% or less when the experiment was initiated. Frequency of GR Palmer amaranth varied by herbicide program during 2012 but was similar among all herbicide programs in 2013 and 2014. Similar frequency of GR Palmer amaranth across all treatments at the end of the experiment most likely resulted from pollen movement from Palmer amaranth treated with glyphosate only to any surviving female plants regardless of PRE or POST treatment. These data suggest that GR Palmer amaranth can be controlled by dicamba and that dicamba is an effective alternative mode of action to glyphosate in fields where GR Palmer amaranth exists.

Type
Weed Management
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Timothy Grey, University of Georgia.

References

Akers, IL, Biggs, ME, Long, AR, Bish, MD, Bradley, KW (2014) Monitoring the changes in glyphosate-resistant weed populations in continuous dicamba-resistant soybean for four years. Page 27 in Proceedings of the 2014 North Central Weed Science Society. Minneapolis, MN North Central Weed Science Society Google Scholar
Beckie, HJ (2006) Herbicide-resistant weeds: management tactics and practices. Weed Technol 20:793814 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, HJ (2011). Herbicide-resistant weed management: focus on glyphosate. Pest Manag Sci 67:10371048 Google ScholarPubMed
Behrens, MR, Mutlu, N, Chakraborty, S, Dumitru, R, Jiang, WZ, LaVallee, BJ, Herman, PL, Clemente, TE, Weeks, DP (2007) Dicamba resistance: enlarging and preserving biotechnology-based weed management strategies. Science 2007:11851188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, AL, York, AC, Yelverton, FH, Culpepper, AS, Batts, RB (2001) Fluometuron carryover to flue-cured tobacco following application to cotton. J Cotton Sci 5:184196 Google Scholar
Burnside, OC, Moomaw, RS, Roeth, FW, Wicks, GA, Wilson, RG (1986) Weed seed demise in soil in weed-free corn (Zea mays) production across Nebraska. Weed Sci 34:248251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahoon, CW, York, AC, Jordan, DL, Everman, WJ, Seagroves, RW (2014) An alternative to multiple protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitor applications in no-till cotton. Weed Technol 28:5871 Google Scholar
Cahoon, CW, York, AC, Jordan, DL, Everman, WJ, Seagroves, RW, Culpepper, AS, Eure, PM (2015) Palmer amaranth (Amarnathus palmeri) management in dicamba-resistant cotton. Weed Technol. 29:758770 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandi, A, Jordan, DL, York, AC, Milla-Lewis, SR, Burton, JD, Culpepper, AS, Whitaker, JR (2013) Interference and control of glyphosate-resistant and susceptible Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) populations under greenhouse conditions. Weed Sci 61:259266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coble, HD, Mortensen, DA (1992) The threshold concept and its application to weed science. Weed Technol 6:191195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeppper, AS (2006) Glyphosate-induced weed shifts. Weed Technol 20:277281 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Grey, TL, Vencill, WK, Kichler, JM, Webster, TM, Brown, SM, York, AC, Davis, JW, Hanna, WW (2006) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci 54:620626 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Webster, TM, Sosnoskie, LM, York, AC (2010) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth in the United States. Pages 195212 in Nandula, VK, ed. Glyphosate Resistance in Crops and Weeds: History, Development, and Management. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Whitaker, JR, MacRae, AW, York, AC (2008) Distribution of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Georgia and North Carolina during 2005 and 2006. J Cotton Sci 12:306310 Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, York, AC (1998) Weed management in glyphosate-tolerant cotton. J Cotton Sci 2:174185 Google Scholar
Ehleringer, J (1983) Ecophysiology of Amaranthus palmeri, a sonoran desert summer annual. Oecologia 57:107112 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, LR, York, AC, Jordan, DL (2007) Flue-cured tobacco and peanut response to diuron, fluometuron, and prometryn applied to a preceding cotton crop. J Cotton Sci 11:168176 Google Scholar
Green, JM, Owen, MDK (2010) Herbicide-resistant crops: utilities and limitations for herbicide-resistant weed management. J Agric Food Chem 59:58195829 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heap, IM (2015) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed March 9, 2015Google Scholar
[ISAAA] International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (2015) Event name: MON88701 × MON 88913 × MON15985. http://www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/event/default.asp?EventID=391. Accessed March 5, 2015Google Scholar
Jalaludin, A, Yu, Q, Powles, SB (2014) Multiple resistance across glufosinate, glyphosate, paraquat, and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in an Eleusine indica population. Weed Res 55:8289 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keely, PE, Carter, CH, Thullen, RJ (1987) Influence of planting date on growth of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Sci 35:199204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, GR, Johnson, WG, Weller, SC, Owen, MDK, Shaw, DR, Wilcut, JW, Jordan, DL, Wilson, RG, Bernards, ML, Young, BG (2009) U.S. grower views on problematic weeds and changes in weed pressure in glyphosate-resistant corn, cotton and soybean cropping systems. Weed Technol 23:162166 Google Scholar
Legleiter, TR, Bradley, KW (2008) Glyphosate and multiple herbicide resistance in common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) populations from Missouri. Weed Sci 56:582587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, AW, Culpepper, AS, Webster, TM, Sosnoskie, LM, Kichler, JM (2013) Cotton yield loss potential in response to length of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference. J Cotton Sci 17:227233 Google Scholar
Menges, RM (1987) Weed seed population dynamics during six years of weed management systems in crop rotations on irrigated soil. Weed Sci 35:328332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, RM, Sosnoskie, LM, Culpepper, AS, Steckel, LE, York, AC, Braxton, LB, Ford, JC (2013) Weed response to 2,4-D, 2,4-DB, and dicamba applied alone or with glufosinate. J Cotton Sci 17:212218 Google Scholar
Meyers, SL, Jennings, KM, Schultheis, JR, Monks, DW (2010) Interference of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in sweetpotato. Weed Sci 58:119203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, GD, Baumann, PA, Chandler, JM (2001) Competitive impact of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) development and yield. Weed Technol 15:408412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neve, P, Norsworthy, JK, Smith, KL, Zelaya, IA (2011) Modelling glyphosate resistance management strategies for Palmer amaranth in cotton. Weed Technol 25:335343 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Griffith, GM, Scott, RC, Smith, KL, Oliver, LR (2008) Confirmation and control of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 22:108113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60:3162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poirier, AH, York, AC, Jordan, DL, Chandi, A, Everman, WJ, Whitaker, JR (2014) Distribution of glyphosate- and thifensulfuron-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in North Carolina. Int J Agron. DOI: 10.1155/2014/747810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powles, SB, Preston, C, Bryan, IB, Jutsum, AR. (1997) Herbicide resistance: impact and management. Adv Agron 58:5793 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, MW, Murray, DS, Verhalen, LM (1999) Full-season Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci 45:305309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samples, CA, Dodds, DM, Reynolds, DZ, Dixon, TH, Bond, JA, Reynolds, DB, Mills, A (2013) Evaluation of PRE and POST weed control programs for Palmer amaranth control. Page 173 in Proceedings of the 2013 Southern Weed Science Society. Houston, TX Southern Weed Science Society Google Scholar
Sanders, CH, Marshall, MW (2014) Weed management systems in dicamba and 2,4-D tolerant cotton. Page 63 in Proceedings of the 2014 Southern Weed Science Society annual meeting. Birmingham, AL: Southern Weed Science Society Google Scholar
Smith, DT, Baker, RV, Steele, GL (2000) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) impacts on yield, harvesting, and ginning in dryland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 14:122126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosnoskie, LM, Webster, TM, Culpepper, AS (2013) Glyphosate resistance does not affect Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) seedbank longevity. Weed Sci 61:283288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosnoskie, LM, Webster, TM, Kichler, JM, MacRae, AW, Grey, TL, Culpepper, AS (2012) Pollen-mediated dispersal of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth under field conditions. Weed Sci 60:366373 Google Scholar
Steckel, LE, Main, CL, Ellis, AT, Mueller, TC (2008) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Tennessee has low level glyphosate resistance. Weed Technol 22:119123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, CJ, Booth, BD (2004) Management of weed seedbanks in the context of populations and communities. Weed Technol 18:14961502 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA-APHIS] U. S. Department of Agriculture-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (2015) Determination of nonregulated status for Monsanto Company MON 88701 cotton. Washington, DC U. S. Department of Agriculture http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/12_18501p_det.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2015Google Scholar
Ward, SM, Webster, TM, Steckel, LE (2013) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri): a review. Weed Technol 27:1227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, TM (2005) Weed survey—southern states: broadleaf crops subsection. Pages 291306 in Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society. Charlotte, NC Southern Weed Science Society Google Scholar
Webster, TM (2013) Weed survey—southern states: broadleaf crops subsection. Pages 275287 in Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society. Houston, TX Southern Weed Science Society Google Scholar
Webster, TM, Grey, TL (2015) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) morphology, growth, and seed production in Georgia. Weed Sci 63:264272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, JR (2009) Distribution, Biology, and Management of Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth in North Carolina. Ph.D dissertation. Raleigh, NC North Carolina State University. 231 pGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, JR, York, AC, Jordan, DL, Culpepper, AS, Sosnoskie, LM (2011) Residual herbicides for Palmer amaranth control. J Cotton Sci 15:8999 Google Scholar
York, AC (1993) Peanut response to fluometuron applied to a preceding cotton crop. Peanut Sci 20:111114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
York, AC, Cahoon, CW, Oliver, GW (2015) Palmer amaranth management with Engenia in BollGard II XtendFlex cotton. Page 174 in Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society. Savannah, GA Southern Weed Science Society Google Scholar
York, AC, Culpepper, AS, Sosnoskie, LM, Bollman, S (2012) Palmer amaranth management in dicamba/glufosinate tolerant cotton. Page 98 in Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society. Charleston, SC Southern Weed Science Society Google Scholar
17
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Long-Term Management of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Dicamba-Tolerant Cotton
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Long-Term Management of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Dicamba-Tolerant Cotton
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Long-Term Management of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Dicamba-Tolerant Cotton
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *