Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T03:48:11.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of four herbicides and tillage for weed control on third year growth of tree seedlings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

John R. Seifert
Affiliation:
Southeast Purdue Agricultural Center, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, Butterville, IN 47223
Marcus F. Selig
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, 715 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907

Abstract

Azafenidin (AZ), pendimethalin, simazine, and sulfometuron (SF) were applied alone and in combination to black cherry, black walnut, eastern white pine, flowering dogwood, northern bayberry, northern red oak, Siberian crabapple, white ash, white oak, and yellow poplar seedlings grown for 2 yr in the field. There were significant differences in diameter, height, and stem volume among the treatments for every species after the third growing season. Tillage significantly increased tree growth over controls for most species. No single herbicide treatment ranked best for all tree species but comparison of the mean ranks of the treatments for all species indicated that AZ resulted in the best growth. Post–bud-break applications of SF and AZ were no better than untreated controls for most species. Herbicide treatments did not affect tree survival over years but exhibited potential for better growth in establishment years.

Type
Weed Management
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bey, C. F., Krajicek, J. E., Williams, R. D., and Phares, R. E. 1976. Weed control in hardwood plantations. Pages 6984 in Proceedings of the John S. Wright Forestry Conference: Herbicides in Forestry. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, 1975.Google Scholar
Bey, C. F. and Williams, R. D. 1976. Weed control in Black Walnut Plantations. USDA Forest Service Research Note NC-203. 4 p. Web page: http://www.ncrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/viewpub.asp?key=1381.Google Scholar
Bickford, C. A. 1962. Methods of measuring the growth of trees as individuals and in stands. Pages 371384 in Kozlowski, T. T. ed. Tree Growth. New York: Ronald.Google Scholar
Bohanek, J. R. and Groninger, J. W. 2003. Impacts of intensive management on black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) growth and bole quality at mid-rotation. For. Sci 49:522529.Google Scholar
Clinton, B. D., Elliott, K. J., and Swank, W. T. 1997. Response of planted eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) to mechanical release, competition, and drought in the southern Appalachians. South. J. Appl. For 21:1923.Google Scholar
Cody, R. P. and Smith, J. K. 1997. Applied Statistics and the SAS Programming Language. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 445 p.Google Scholar
Desteven, D. 1991. Experiments on mechanisms of tree establishment in old-field succession- seedling survival and growth. Ecology 72:10761088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdmann, G. G. 1967. Chemical Weed Control Increases Survival and Growth in Hardwood Plantings. USDA Forest Service Research Note NC-34. www.ncrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/viewpub.asp?key=1088.Google Scholar
Ezell, A. W. 1999. Crop tolerance of nuttal, water, and willow oaks to applications of DPX-6447: second year results. Pages 142144 in Proceedings of the Tenth Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference. USDA Forest Service SRS-30. www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/viewpub.jsp?index=1171.Google Scholar
Ezell, A. W. and Catchot, A. L. 1997. Preemergent and postemergent applications of sulfometuron methyl for competition control in oak plantations. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 50:109111.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, C. H., Richards, R. F., Seldon, C. W., and May, J. T. 1975. Three year effects of herbaceous weed control in a sycamore plantation. Weed Sci 23:3235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlow, W. M., Harrar, E. S., Hardin, J. W., and White, F. M. 2001. Textbook of Dendrology, 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 544 p.Google Scholar
Horsley, S. B., McCormick, L. H., and Groninger, J. W. 1992. Effects of timing of oust application on survival of hardwood seedlings. North. J. Appl. For 9:2227.Google Scholar
IVI Online. 1995. Information Ventures Inc. Last modified on: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 13:20:49 http://infoventures.com/e-hlth/pestcide/sulfomet.html.Google Scholar
Miller, J. H. 1993. Oak plantation establishment using mechanical, burning, and herbicide treatments. Pages 264289 in Loftis, and McGee, eds. Oak regeneration: serious problems, practical recommendations. Asheville, NC: Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service SE-84.Google Scholar
Muir, R. L. 1999. Pre-emergent herbaceous weed control screening in hardwood plantations with azafenidin, imazapic, and diclosulam on several agricultural sites throughout the southeast. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 52:133.Google Scholar
Muir, R. L. and Glover, G. R. 1998. Pre-emergent herbaceous weed control screening in hardwood plantations in southwest Alabama. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 51:165.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. D. and Beineke, W. F. 1995. Important Information About Planting Black Walnut in Indiana. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, FNR-149. www.agriculture.purdue.edu/fnr/Extension/extpubs.htm.Google Scholar
Rose, R. and Ketchum, J. S. 2003. Interaction of initial seedling diameter, fertilization and weed control on Douglas-fir growth over the first four years after planting. Ann. For. Sci 60:625635.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis System. 2002. SAS v. 8.2. SAS Institute, SAS Circle, P.O. Box 2000, Cary, NC 27512–8000.Google Scholar
Seifert, J. R. 1993. Two-year results of seven herbicides/combinations on hardwood seedlings. Proc. North Central Weed Sci. Soc 48:67.Google Scholar
Seifert, J. R. 1997. Chemical weed control before and after planting Walnut. Pages 112119 in Van Sambeek, J. W. ed. Knowledge for the Future of Black Walnut: Proceedings of the 5th Black Walnut Symposium. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station NC-191. www.ncrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/viewpub.asp?key=255.Google Scholar
Seifert, J. R. and Woeste, K. E. 2002. Evaluation of four herbicides and tillage for weed control on 1–0 planted tree seedlings. North J. Appl. For 19:101105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, M. E., David, C. S., and Koch, G. G. 1995. Categorical Data Analysis Using the SAS System, Cary, NC:. SAS Institute. 499 p.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. F. Jr., Nix, L. E., Gottschalk, K. W., and Fosbroke, S. L. C. 1995. Two-year results of herbicide released, naturally-regenerated bottomland cherrybark and shumard oak seedlings. Pages 341348 in Proceedings of the 10th Central Hardwood Forest Conference. Morgantown, WV: Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service NE-197.Google Scholar
von Althen, F. W. 1989. Effects of weed control and irrigation on 7-and 8-year growth of planted black walnut. Pages 103113 in Phelps, J. E. ed. The Continuing Quest for Quality, Proceedings of the 4th Black Walnut Symposium. Indianapolis, IN: Walnut Council.Google Scholar
Williams, R. D. and Krajicek, J. E. 1976. The Effect of Four Herbicides on the Survival and Growth of Nine Hardwood Species. USDA Forest Service Research Note. St. Paul, MN: North Central Forest Experiment Station, 1976, NC-206. 4 p.Google Scholar
Yeiser, J. L. 1999. Herbicide and fertilizer combinations for newly planted loblolly pine seedlings on a flatwoods site in southeastern Arkansas: year three results. Pages 451454 in Proceedings of the 10th Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference. Asheville, NC: Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service SRS-30.Google Scholar