Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:16:05.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Wild Oats in Oats by Barban Plus Antidote

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

F. Y. Chang ,
G. R. Stephenson ,
G. W. Anderson  and
J. D. Bandeen
F. Y. Chang
Affiliation:
Dep. of Environmental Biology; Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
G. R. Stephenson
Affiliation:
Dep. of Environmental Biology; Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
G. W. Anderson
Affiliation:
Dep. of Crop Sci.; Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
J. D. Bandeen
Affiliation:
Dep. of Crop Sci.; Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Growth room and field studies indicated that coating the seeds of oats (Avena sativa L.) with NA (1,8-naphthalic anhydride) at rates of 0.5 to 1% by seed weight significantly reduced the phytotoxicity of barban (4-chloro-2-butynyl m-chlorocarbanilate) applied to the foliage at rates up to 1.2 kg/ha. Complete protection was obtained when barban was applied at 0.4 kg/ha, the highest rate recommended for the control of wild oats (Avena fatua L.) in cereal crops. Treatment of oat seeds with this antidote did not reduce the herbicidal effect of barban on wild oats grown in the same soil. Thus, coating oat seeds with the antidote may allow the use of barban for the selective control of wild oats in oat crops. NA seed treatment also slightly reduced oat injury from diallate [S-(2,3-dichloroallyl)diisopropylthiocarbamate] and triallate [S-(2,3,3-trichloroallyl)diisopropylthiocarbamate].

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 22 , Issue 6 , November 1974 , pp. 546 - 548
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Burnside, O.C., Wicks, G.A., and Fenster, C.R. 1971. Protecting corn from herbicide injury by seed treatment. Weed Sci. 19:565–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chang, F.Y., Stephenson, G.R., and Bandeen, J.D. 1973. Comparative effects of three EPTC antidotes. Weed Sci. 21:292–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Eastin, E.F. 1972. Evaluation of a sorghum seed treatment to prevent injury from acetanilide herbicides. Agron. J. 64:556–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Friesen, H.A. 1961. Some factors affecting the control of wild oats with barban. Weeds 9:185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Hoffmann, O.L. 1962. Chemical seed treatments as herbicidal antidotes. Weeds 10:322–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hoffmann, O.L., Pullen, J.W., Epperly, J.R., and Hopkins, T.R. 1960. Factors affecting the activity of 4-chloro-2-butynyl N-(3-chlorophenyl) carbamate as a selective herbicide. Weeds 8:198–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Jordan, L.S. and Jolliffe, V.A. 1971. Protection of plants from herbicides with 1,8-naphthalic anhydride as illustrated with sorghum. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 6:417–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Selleck, G.W. 1961. Recent advances in the chemical control of wild oats. Weeds 9:60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Wood, H.E. 1953. The occurrence and the problem of wild oats in the Great Plains region of North America. Weeds 2:292–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar