Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:51:00.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the use of red stimuli to isolate magnocellular responses in psychophysical experiments: A perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2004

BERNT CHRISTIAN SKOTTUN
BERNT CHRISTIAN SKOTTUN
Affiliation:
Skottun Research, 273 Mather Street, Piedmont
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Neurophysiological recordings have shown that activity of magnocellular neurons may be reduced by red backgrounds. This has led some researchers to use red light, or red filters, in attempts to determine the magnocellular contribution to psychophysical tasks. This requires that red light not affect parvocellular neurons, or at least that it is possible to control for the effect on the parvocellular system by using other colors. The present report investigates these assumptions by calculating the effect of red, green, and blue filters on the three cone pigments and on the four parvocellular color-opponent cell mechanisms. It is found that a red filter has a large effect on the long- and middle-wavelength cone pigments and on the red–green color-opponent mechanisms. A green filter, on the other hand, has little effect. A blue filter has a fairly pronounced effect but this effect is distinctly different from that of the red filter. These results indicate that one ought not rely upon red light to isolate magnocellular activity in psychological experiments. The results also indicate that it is difficult to use colors other than red to control for the effect of this color on the parvocellular system.

Keywords

MagnocellularParvocellularRed lightRed filtersColors
Type
Research Article
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , January 2004 , pp. 63 - 68
Copyright
2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alpern, M. (1953). Metacontrast. Journal of the Optical Society of America 29, 631–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baseler, H.A. & Sutter, E.E. (1997). M and P components of the VEP and their visual field distribution. Vision Research 37, 675–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boynton, R.M. (1979). Human Color Vision. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Breitmeyer, B.G. & Breier, J.I. (1994). Effects of background color on reaction time to stimuli varying in size and contrast: Inferences about human M channels. Vision Research 34, 1039–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breitmeyer, B. & Williams, M. (1990). Effects of isoluminant-background color on metacontrast and stroboscopic motion: Interactions between sustained (P) and transient (M) channels. Vision Research 30, 1069–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, C., Ashourzadeh, A., Kelly, C., Monfette, S., & Kinsey, K. (2003). Can the magnocellular pathway read? Evidence from studies of color. Vision Research 43, 1211–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Valois, R.L., Abramov, I., & Jacobs, G.H. (1966). Analysis of response patterns of LGN cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America 56, 966–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobkins, K.R. & Albright, T.D. (2003). Merging processing streams: Color cues for motion detection and interpretation. In The Visual Neurosciences, eds. Chalupa, L. & Werner, J., pp. 1217–1228. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Edwards, V.T., Hogben, J.H., Clark, G.D., & Pratt, C. (1996). Effects of a red background on magnocellular functioning in average and specifically disabled readers. Vision Research 36, 1037–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrera, V.P., Nealey, T.A., & Maunsell, J.H.R. (1994). Responses in macaque visual area V4 following inactivation of the parvocellular and magnocellular LGN pathways. Journal of Neuroscience 14, 2080–2088.Google Scholar
Kruger, J. (1977). Stimulus dependent colour specificities of monkey lateral geniculate neurons. Experimental Brain Research 30, 297–311.Google Scholar
Legge, G.E., Rubin, G.S., & Luebker, A. (1987). Psychophysics of reading—V. The role of contrast in normal vision. Vision Research 27, 1165–1177.Google Scholar
Levitt, J.B., Yoshioka, T., & Lund, J.S. (1994). Intrinsic cortical connections in macaque visual area V2: Evidence for interaction between different functional streams. Journal of Comparative Neurology 342, 551–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, J.B., Schumer, R.A., Sherman, S.M., Spear, P.D., & Movshon, J.A. (2001). Visual response properties of neurons in the LGN of normally reared and visually deprived macaque monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology 85, 2111–2129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maunsell, J.H.R., Nealey, T.A., & DePriest, D.D. (1990). Magnocellular and parvocellular contributions to responses in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neuroscience 10, 3323–3334.Google Scholar
Merigan, W.H. & Maunsell, J.H.R. (1993). How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Annual Review of Neuroscience 16, 369–402.Google Scholar
Michimata, C., Oboto, M., & Mugihima, Y. (1999). Effects of background color on the global and local processing of hierarchical organized stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11, 1–8.Google Scholar
O'Brien, B.A., Mansfield, J.S., & Legge, G.E. (2000). The effect of contrast on reading speed in dyslexia. Vision Research 40, 1921–1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pammer, K. & Lovegrove, W. (2001). The influence of color on transient system activity: Implications for dyslexia research. Perception and Psychophysics 63, 490–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawatari, A. & Callaway, E.M. (1996). Convergence of magno- and parvicellular pathways in layer 4B of macaque primary visual cortex. Nature 380, 442–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, P.H. & Logothetis, N.K. (1990). The color-opponent and broad-band channels of the primate visual system. Trends in Neuroscience 13, 392–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapley, R. (1990). Visual sensitivity and parallel retinocortical channels. Annual Review of Psychology 41, 635–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapley, R. & Perry, V.H. (1986). Cat and monkey retinal ganglion cells and their visual functional roles. Trends in Neuroscience 9, 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skottun, B.C. (2000). The magnocellular deficit theory of dyslexia: The evidence from contrast sensitivity. Vision Research 40, 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skottun, B.C. (2001a). On the use of metacontrast to assess magnocellular function in dyslexic readers. Perception and Psychophysics 63, 1271–1274.Google Scholar
Skottun, B.C. (2001b). On the use of the Ternus test to assess magnocellular function. Perception 30, 1449–1457.Google Scholar
Skottun, B.C. (2004). Magnocellular reading and dyslexia. Vision Research (in press).Google Scholar
Skottun, B.C., Bradley, A., Sclar, G., Ohzawa, I., & Freeman, R.D. (1987). The effects of contrast on visual orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: A comparison of single cells and behavior. Journal of Neurophysiology 57, 773–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V.C. & Pokorny, J. (1975). Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm. Vision Research 15, 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, H. (1935). Studies on contour: I. Qualitative analysis. American Journal of Psychology 47, 40–64.Google Scholar
Wiesel, T.N. & Hubel, D.H. (1966). Spatial and chromatic interactions in the lateral geniculate body of the rhesus monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 29, 1115–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyszecki, G. & Stiles, W.S. (1982). Color Science—Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae. (2nd edition) New York: John Wiley and Sons.