Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T13:57:20.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Achromatic parvocellular contrast gain in normal and color defective observers: Implications for the evolution of color vision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2006

MARGARET LUTZE ,
JOEL POKORNY  and
VIVIANNE C. SMITH
MARGARET LUTZE
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
JOEL POKORNY
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
VIVIANNE C. SMITH
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The PC pathway conveys both chromatic and achromatic information, with PC neurons being more responsive to chromatic (L−M) than to achromatic (L+M) stimuli. In considering the evolution of color vision, it has been suggested that the dynamic range of chromatic PC-pathway processing is tuned to the chromatic content of the natural environment. Anomalous trichromats, with reduced separation of their L- and M-cone spectral sensitivities, have diminished chromatic input to PC-pathway cells. Dichromats, with absent L or M cones, should have no chromatic input to PC-pathway cells. Therefore, the PC-pathway dynamic range of color defectives should be released from any constraint imposed by the chromatic environment. Here we ask whether this results in compensatory enhancement of achromatic PC-pathway processing in color defectives. This study employed a psychophysical method designed to isolate PC-pathway processing using achromatic stimuli. In a pulsed-pedestal condition, a four-square stimulus array appeared within a uniform surround. During a trial, one of the test squares differed from the other three, and the observer's task was to choose the square that was different. A four-alternative, forced-choice method was used to determine thresholds as a function of the contrast of the four-square array to the surround. Seven color defective and four normal observers participated. Results showed no systematic differences between normals and color defectives. There was no enhancement of achromatic processing as compensation for reduced chromatic processing in the PC-pathway system in color defectives. From physiological recordings, PC-pathway achromatic contrast gains of dichromatic and trichromatic New World primates and trichromatic Old World macaques have also been shown to be similar to each other. Our study and the animal studies imply that PC-pathway contrast gain parameters were regulated by factors other than the environmental chromaticity gamut, and may have arisen in a nontrichromatic common ancestor to both Old and New World primates.

Keywords

Achromatic parvocellular contrast gainColor vision defectsColor vision evolution
Type
CONGENITAL DEFICIENCIES
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 23 , Issue 3-4 , May 2006 , pp. 611 - 616
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blessing, E.M., Solomon, S.G., Hashemi-Nezhad, M., Morris, B.J., & Martin, P.R. (2004). Chromatic and spatial properties of parvocellular cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Journal of Physiology 557, 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brainard, D.H., Roorda, A., Yamauchi, Y., Calderone, J.B., Metha, A., Neitz, M., Neitz, J., Williams, D.R., & Jacobs, G.H. (2000). Functional consequences of the relative numbers of L and M cones. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 17, 607–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaparro, A., Stromeyer, C.F.D., Huang, E.P., Kronauer, R.E., & Eskew, R.T.J. (1993). Colour is what the eye sees best. Nature 361, 348–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dacey, D.M. (2000). Parallel pathways for spectral coding in primate retina. Annual Review of Neuroscience 23, 743–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, E. & Shapley, R.M. (1986). The primate retina contains two types of ganglion cells, with high and low contrast sensitivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 83, 2755–2757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, A. & Dieterici, C. (1886). Die Grundempfindungen und ihre Intensitats-Vertheilung im Spectrum. Akademie der Wissenschaften Berlin, Sitzungsberichte Pt.2, 805–829.Google Scholar
Lee, B.B. (1996). Receptive field structure in the primate retina. Vision Research 36, 631–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, B.B., Pokorny, J., Smith, V.C., & Kremers, J. (1994). Responses to pulses and sinusoids in macaque ganglion cells. Vision Research 34, 3081–3096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, B.B., Pokorny, J., Smith, V.C., Martin, P.R., & Valberg, A. (1990). Luminance and chromatic modulation sensitivity of macaque ganglion cells and human observers. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 7, 2223–2236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonova, A., Pokorny, J., & Smith V,C. (2003). Spatial frequency processing in inferred PC- and MC-pathways. Vision Research 43, 2133–2139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mollon, J.D. (1982). Color vision. Annual Review of Psychology 33, 41–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osorio, D. & Vorobyev, M. (1996). Colour vision as an adaptation to frugivory in primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B (London) 263, 593–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pokorny, J. & Smith, V.C. (1977). Evaluation of single pigment shift model of anomalous trichromacy. Journal of the Optical Society of America 67, 1196–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pokorny, J. & Smith, V.C. (1997). Psychophysical signatures associated with magnocellular and parvocellular pathway contrast gain. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 14, 2477–2486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pokorny, J., Smith, V.C., & Wesner, M. (1991). Variability in cone populations and implications. In From Pigments to Perception, ed. Valberg, A. & Lee, B.B., pp. 23–34. New York: Plenum.CrossRef
Smith, V.C. & Pokorny, J. (2003). Psychophysical correlates of parvo- and magnocellular function. In Normal and Defective Colour Vision, ed. Mollon, J., Pokorny, J. & Knoblauch, K., pp. 91–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Smith, V.C., Pokorny, J., & Swartley, R. (1973). Continuous hue estimation of brief flashes by deuteranomalous observers. American Journal of Psychology 86, 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V.C., Sun, V.C., & Pokorny, J. (2001). Pulse and steady-pedestal contrast discrimination: Effect of spatial parameters. Vision Research 41, 2079–2088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, P. & Mollon, J.D. (2000). Catarrhine photopigments are optimized for detecting targets against a foliage background. Journal of Experimental Biology 203, 1963–1986.Google Scholar
von der Twer, T. & MacLeod, D.I. (2001). Optimal nonlinear codes for the perception of natural colours. Network 12, 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, T., Lee, B.B., Kremers, J., Cowing, J.A., Hunt, D.M., Martin, P.R., & Troy, J.B. (1995). Visual responses in the lateral geniculate nucleus of dichromatic and trichromatic marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Journal of Neuroscience 15, 7892–7904.Google Scholar
Zele, A.J. & Vingrys, A.J. (2005). Cathode-ray-tube monitor artefacts in neurophysiology. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 141, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar