Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:37:39.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is there an omitted stimulus response in the human cone flicker electroretinogram?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

J. JASON McANANY  and
KENNETH R. ALEXANDER
J. JASON McANANY
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
KENNETH R. ALEXANDER*
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
*
*Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Kenneth R. Alexander, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1855 W. Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60612. E-mail: kennalex@uic.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Omitting a stimulus from a train of repetitive stimuli, by either interrupting or terminating the train, can elicit an electrophysiological response that occurs at the time appropriate for the omitted stimulus. This study investigated whether such an omitted stimulus response (OSR) is present in the flicker electroretinogram (ERG) of the human cone system. ERGs were recorded from 11 visually normal subjects in response to full-field sinusoidal flicker trains presented against a rod-desensitizing adapting field at frequencies ranging from 12.5 to 100 Hz. Recordings were synchronized with the onset of the stimulus trains, and the amplitude and relative delay of any additional ERG responses following the offset of the flicker train were analyzed. At stimulus frequencies below 35 Hz, the number of ERG responses always equaled the number of stimulus cycles. However, over the frequency range of 38.5 to 100 Hz, the ERG contained an extra response following flicker train offset. At stimulus frequencies from 38.5 to 62.5 Hz, there was a constant delay between the peak of the extra ERG response and the time at which the next stimulus would have occurred had the flicker train continued. This constant delay is characteristic of an OSR. In addition, an extra ERG response was apparent at these same stimulus frequencies if the flicker train was interrupted by omitting stimulus cycles from the middle of the train. The pattern of ERG findings is consistent with a recently proposed model of the OSR that attributes the phenomenon to a resonant oscillation in retinal bipolar cells.

Keywords

ERGFlickerTemporal frequencyConesAdaptation
Type
Research Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , March 2009 , pp. 189 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, K.R., Raghuram, A. & McAnany, J.J. (2008). Comparison of spectral measures of period doubling in the cone flicker electroretinogram. Documenta Ophthalmologica 117, 197–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, K.R., Rajagopalan, A.S., Raghuram, A. & Fishman, G.A. (2006). Activation phase of cone phototransduction and the flicker electroretinogram in retinitis pigmentosa. Vision Research 46, 2773–2785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bullock, T.H., Karamürsel, S., Achimowicz, J.Z., McClune, M.C. & Başar-Eroglu, C. (1994). Dynamic properties of human visual evoked and omitted stimulus potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 91, 42–53.Google Scholar
Crevier, D.W. & Meister, M. (1998). Synchronous period-doubling in flicker vision of salamander and man. Journal of Neurophysiology 79, 1869–1878.Google Scholar
Kondo, M. & Sieving, P.A. (2001). Primate photopic sine-wave flicker ERG: Vector modeling analysis of component origins using glutamate analogs. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 42, 305–312.Google Scholar
Kremers, J. (2003). The assessment of L- and M-cone specific electroretinographical signals in the normal and abnormal human retina. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 22, 579–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krishna, V.R., Alexander, K.R. & Peachey, N.S. (2002). Temporal properties of the mouse cone electroretinogram. Journal of Neurophysiology 87, 42–48.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G. & Berry, M.J. (2008). Sophisticated temporal pattern recognition in retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Neurophysiology 99, 1787–1798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, G., Harris, R., Shrom, D. & Berry, M.J. (2007). Detection and prediction of periodic patterns by the retina. Nature Neuroscience 10, 552–554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viswanathan, S., Frishman, L.J. & Robson, J.G. (2002). Inner-retinal contributions to the photopic sinusoidal flicker electroretinogram of macaques. Documenta Ophthalmologica 105, 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, S. & Burns, S.A. (1996). Analysis of retinal light adaptation with the flicker electroretinogram. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 13, 649–657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, S., Burns, S.A. & Elsner, A.E. (1995). Effects of flicker adaptation and retinal gain control on the flicker ERG. Vision Research 35, 2943–2953.Google Scholar