Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T21:22:17.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REDESIGNING FEMININITY: MISS MARJORIBANKS'S DRAWING-ROOM OF OPPORTUNITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

Andrea Kaston Tange
Andrea Kaston Tange*
Affiliation:
Eastern Michigan University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Margaret Oliphant's work has of late received renewed attention for her portrayal of heroines who struggle against the confines of proper middle-class femininity – who are at once sympathetic and yet do not fit the model of the submissive Victorian domestic angel – and Miss Marjoribanks (1866) is no exception. Without fully discounting the Victorian notion that there is a proper place women ought to occupy, Miss Marjoribanks raises complex questions about how that place is defined and limited. Recent scholarly attention to the novel highlights Oliphant's sustained engagement with the issue of how far propriety and custom circumscribe a woman's place. Such examinations, however, fail to address the extent to which Oliphant demonstrates the flexibility of cultural notions of a woman's place by focusing the action of Miss Marjoribanks almost entirely on the heroine's creation of a very specific physical place for herself – her drawing-room. Examining Miss Marjoribanks's portrayal of how a Victorian woman might capitalize on the centrality of the drawing-room in shaping cultural notions of feminine identity, this essay argues that once Lucilla Marjoribanks has established the drawing-room as a physical and ideological space that will contain her actions, she uses this space and all it represents to expand the boundaries of her cultural place. By focusing specifically on the work its heroine undertakes within her drawing-room and by asserting that a woman's power lies in the possibility for feminine taste to accomplish action, Oliphant's novel, like her heroine, operates within the “prejudices of society” while simultaneously offering a means to exploit those prejudices. This architecturally-motivated re-reading of Oliphant's novel in turn suggests a re-reading of Oliphant's own career. For I would argue that novels operated for Oliphant the way that drawing-rooms do for Lucilla: they provided a culturally-sanctioned place in which to locate herself, and thereby reaffirm her respectable feminine position, even while she undertook projects that challenged Victorian assumptions about gendered identity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 163 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Beeton, Mrs. Isabella. The Book of Household Management. London: S. O. Beeton, 1861.Google Scholar
Braddon, Mary Elizabeth. Lady Audley's Secret. 1861–62. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Brown, Richard. Domestic Architecture: Containing a History of the Science, and the Principles of Designing. London: Bernard Quaritch, 1852.Google Scholar
Cassell's Household Guide: Being a Complete Encyclopaedia of Domestic and Social Economy. London: Cassell, Petter, and Galpin, 1869–71.Google Scholar
Cohen, Monica. “Maximizing Oliphant: Begging the question and the politics of satire.” Victorian Women Writers and the Woman Question. Ed. Thompson, Nicola Diane. New York: Cambridge UP, 1999. 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colby, Vineta, and Robert, A. “Chronicler of Carlingford.” The Equivocal Virtue: Mrs. Oliphant and the Victorian Literary Marketplace. Hamden: Archon Books, 1966. 38–74.Google Scholar
Cvetkovich, Ann. Mixed Feelings: Feminism, Mass Culture, and Victorian Sensationalism. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastlake, Charles. Hints on Household Taste. 2nd ed. Boston: James R. Osgood, 1878.Google Scholar
Ellis, Mrs. Sarah Stickney. The Wives of England. New York: D. Appleton, 1843.Google Scholar
The Etiquette of Courtship and Matrimony: With a Complete Guide to the Forms of a Wedding. London: Routledge, Warne, and Routledge, 1865.Google Scholar
Etiquette, Politeness, and Good Breeding. London: Ward, Lock, and Tyler, 1870.Google Scholar
Harris, Susan K. The Cultural Work of the Late-Nineteenth Century Hostess: Annie Adams Fields and Mary Gladstone Drew. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.Google Scholar
Helimann, Ann. “Mrs. Grundy's Rebellion: Margaret Oliphant Between Orthodoxy and the New Woman.” Women's Writing 6.2 (1999): 215–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
H. G. C. The English Maiden: Her Moral and Domestic Duties. London: Talboys, Clarke, and Wilson, 1842.Google Scholar
Homans, Margaret. “Queen Victoria's Widowhood and the Making of Victorian Queens.” Royal Representations: Queen Victoria and British Culture, 1837–1876. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1998. 58–99.Google Scholar
Home Truths for Home Peace or “Muddle” Defeated. London: Effingham Wilson, 1851.Google Scholar
The Household Encylcopaedia; or Family Dictionary of Everything Connected with Housekeeping and Domestic Medicine. London: W. Kent, 1858–1860.Google Scholar
Houston, Gail Turley. “‘The Grandest Trade of All’: Professional Exchanges between the Queen and Margaret Oliphant.” Royalties: The Queen and Victorian Writers. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 1999. 139–63.Google Scholar
“How to Build A House and Live in It, no. I.” Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine 59.368 (June 1846): 758–65.Google Scholar
Kerr, Robert. The Gentleman's House; Or, How to Plan English Residences from the Parsonage to the Palace. 3rd ed. London: John Murray, 1871.Google Scholar
The Lady's Own Book: An Intellectual, Moral, and Physical Monitor. London: W. R. M'Phun, 1859.Google Scholar
Langland, Elizabeth. Nobody's Angels: Middle-Class Women and Domestic Ideology in Victorian Culture. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Logan, Thad. “Decorating Domestic Space: Middle-Class Women and Victorian Interiors.” Keeping the Victorian House: A Collection of Essays. Ed. Dickerson, Vanessa D.. New York: Garland, 1998. 207–34.Google Scholar
Logan, Thad. The Victorian Parlour. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Sally. Daily Life in Victorian England. Westport: Greenwood, 1996.Google Scholar
O'Mealy, Joseph H. “Mrs. Oliphant, Miss Marjoribanks (1866), and the Victorian Canon.” Victorian Newsletter 82 (Fall 1992): 44–49.Google Scholar
Oliphant, Margaret. “The Condition of Women.” Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine 83 (Feb. 1858): 139–54.Google Scholar
Oliphant, Margaret. “The Laws Concerning Women.” Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine 79 (April 1856): 379–87.Google Scholar
Oliphant, Margaret. Miss Marjoribanks. 1866. London: Penguin Books/Virago, 1989.Google Scholar
Oliphant, Margaret. “Novels.” Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine 102 (Sept. 1867): 257–80.Google Scholar
Oliphant, Margaret. “Novels.” Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine 94 (July–Dec. 1863): 168–83.Google Scholar
Oliphant, Margaret. “Sensation Novels.” Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine 91 (May 1862): 564–84.Google Scholar
Orrinsmith, Mrs. The Drawing-Room: Its Decoration and Furniture. London: Macmillan, 1878.Google Scholar
Peterson, Linda. “The Female Bildungsroman: Tradition and Subversion in Oliphant's Fiction.” Margaret Oliphant: Critical Essays on a Gentle Subversive. Trela 66–89.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary. Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1988.Google Scholar
Rubik, Margarete. “The Subversion of Literary Cliches in Oliphant's Fiction.” Margaret Oliphant: Critical Essays on a Gentle Subversive. Trela 49–65.Google Scholar
Rubik, Margarete. The Novels of Mrs. Oliphant: A Subversive View of Traditional Themes. New York: Peter Lang, 1994.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. “Of Queen's Gardens” Sesame and Lilies. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1880. 74–119.Google Scholar
Schaub, Melissa. “Queen of the Air or Constitutional Monarch?: Idealism, Irony, and Narrative Power in Miss Marjoribanks.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 55.2 (Sept. 2000): 195–225.Google Scholar
Stevenson, J. J.House Architecture. London: Macmillan, 1880.Google Scholar
Terry, R. C.Victorian Popular Fiction, 1860–80. London: Macmillan, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trela, D. J. “Introduction: Discovering the Gentle Subversive.” Margaret Oliphant: Critical Essays on a Gentle Subversive. Ed. Trela, D. J.. London: Associated University Presses, 1995. 11–32.Google Scholar
Tromp, Marlene, Gilbert, Pamela K., and Haynie, Aeron, eds. Beyond Sensation: Mary Elizabeth Braddon in Context. Albany: SUNY P, 2000.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. H., F. R. C. S. A Manual of Domestic Economy: Suited to Families Spending from L.100 to L.1000 a Year. 2nd ed. London: G. Routledge, 1857.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Gervase. The Choice of a Dwelling: A Practical Handbook of Useful Information on all Points Connected with Hiring, Buying, or Building A House. London: John Murray, 1871.Google Scholar
Williams, Merryn. “Feminist or Antifeminist? Oliphant and the Woman Question.” Margaret Oliphant: Critical Essays on a Gentle Subversive. Trela 165–80.Google Scholar