Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-01T06:49:05.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hopkins's Notebooks and Microsocial Form

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2020

Extract

This article proposes a way of linking textual form and the social world. The forms in question are the notebooks of Gerard Manley Hopkins, specifically those he kept between 1866 and 1875, a period that begins with his conversion to Catholicism, initiation into Jesuit training, and rejection of poetry. These five notebooks (A1–A5) have struck some readers as intensely asocial. Their creator was famously resistant to circulation and readership, on one hand (“Please not to read,” he inscribes on the inside front cover of the first), and more concerned with natural than human phenomena, on the other. I show instead that the notebooks project networks of relation between humans, objects, and the natural world. My hope is that what follows will refresh some of the ways we think about and navigate online social forms in the twenty-first century.

Type
Defamiliarizations
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Bellanca, Mary Ellen. Daybooks of Discovery: Nature Diaries in Britain, 1770–1870. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Cross, Richard. “Medieval Theories of Haecceity.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2014 edition, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/medieval-haecceity (accessed 15 January 2019).Google Scholar
Dubois, Martin. Gerard Manley Hopkins and the Poetry of Religious Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. Ethnomethodology's Program: Working out Durkheim's Aphorism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. “Evidence for Locally Produced, Naturally Accountable Phenomena of Order, Logic, Reason, Meaning, Method, etc. In and as of the Essential Haecceity of Immortal Ordinary Society.” Sociological Theory 6, no. 1 (1988): 103–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gitelman, Lisa. “Holding Electronic Networks by the Wrong End.” amodern 2: Network Archaeology (October 2013), http://amodern.net/article/holding-electronic-networks-by-the-wrong-end (accessed 16 January2019).Google Scholar
Hopkins, Gerard Manley. Correspondence. Vols. 1 and 2 of The Collected Works of Gerard Manley Hopkins. Edited by Thornton, R. K. R. and Phillips, Catherine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Gerard Manley. Diaries, Journals, and Notebooks. Vol. 3 of The Collected Works of Gerard Manley Hopkins. Edited by Higgins, Leslie. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Gerard Manley. Poems by Gerard Manley Hopkins. Edited by MacKenzie, Norman H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Gerard Manley. Selections from the Note-Books of Gerard Manley Hopkins. Edited by Weiss, T.. New York: New Directions, 1938.Google Scholar
Kramnick, Jonathan, and Nersessian, Anahid. “Form and Explanation.” Critical Inquiry 43, no. 3 (2017): 650–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Levine, Caroline. Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Love, Heather. “Close but Not Deep: Literary Ethics and the Descriptive Turn.” New Literary History 41, no. 2 (2010): 371–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, Heather. “Reading the Social: Erving Goffman and Sexuality Studies.” In Theory Aside, edited by Potts, Jason and Stout, Daniel, –. Durham: Duke University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Mariani, Paul. Gerard Manley Hopkins: A Life. New York: Penguin, 2008.Google Scholar
Martin, Meredith. The Rise and Fall of Meter: Poetry and English National Culture, 1860–1930. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis. “The Creation of the Self in Gerard Manley Hopkins.” ELH 22, no. 4 (1955): 293319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortimer, Anthony. “Hopkins: The Stress and the Self.” In The Authentic Cadence: Centennial Essays on Gerard Manley Hopkins. Fribourg: University Press Fribourg, 1992.Google Scholar
Phillips, Catherine. Gerard Manley Hopkins and the Victorian Visual World. London: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Ravinthiran, Vidyan. “The Spontaneity of Hopkins's Journal Prose.” Review of English Studies 64, no. 267 (2013): 838–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Gerald, ed. Gerard Manley Hopkins: The Critical Heritage. New York: Routledge, 1987.Google Scholar
Sobolev, Dennis. “Inscape Revisited.” English 51, no. 201 (2002): 219–34.Google Scholar
Weiss, T.The Apprenticeship of Gerard Manley Hopkins.” In Selections from the Note- Books of Gerard Manley Hopkins. New York: New Directions, 1946.Google Scholar
White, Norman. Hopkins in Ireland. Dublin: University College Dublin Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Willems, Brian. Hopkins and Heidegger. London: Bloomsbury, 2010.Google Scholar