Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T21:18:55.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MALIGNANT FAITH AND COGNITIVE RESTRUCTURING: REALISM IN ADAM BEDE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

Jon Singleton
Jon Singleton*
Affiliation:
Syracuse University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I begin this essay by quoting two books that deeply shaped George Eliot's thinking because I want to draw attention to the problem of “faith” in her writings, which I believe illuminates an important aspect of her realist project. I am not so much interested in her well-documented personal loss of faith, or her deconstruction of Victorian Christianity into religious humanism (Knoepflmacher 44–59; Wright 173–201; Dolin 165–89), as I am in her positive theorization of faith, throughout her early writings, as a cognitive structure that shapes perception, interpretation, and action. Faith materializes as beliefs shape perception, perceptions shape belief, in hermeneutical spirals coiling out to exert benign or malignant force on believers’ material lives. For Eliot, Christian faith enables social violence, and literature must both expose this malignant relationship and instill more benign (and less totalizing) cognitive patterns for bringing one's faith to bear on materiality. Among other effects, such a transformation changes the way the Bible itself can be read. The realism Eliot articulates in Adam Bede (1859) and elaborates for the rest of her career is modeled on her understanding of the cognitive structure of faith – and calculated to infiltrate and eradicate it.

Type
Work in Progress
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 239 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Anger, Suzy. “George Eliot and Philosophy.” Cambridge Companion to George Eliot. Ed. Levine, George. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. 76–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anger, Suzy. Victorian Interpretation. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2005.Google Scholar
Beer, Gillian. Darwin's Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot, and Nineteenth-Century Fiction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983.Google Scholar
Beer, Gillian. George Eliot. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1986.Google Scholar
Brontë, Charlotte. Jane Eyre. 1847. Ed. Smith, Margaret. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Carroll, David, ed. George Eliot and the Conflict of Interpretations: A Reading of the Novels. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, John. “Adam Bede” [Unsigned]. Westminster Review 71 (April 1859): 486–512.Google Scholar
Chase, Karen. Eros & Psyche: The Representation of Personality in Charlotte Brontë, Charles Dickens, and George Eliot. New York: Methuen, 1984.Google Scholar
Collier, R. Laird. Meditations on the Essence of Christianity. Boston: Roberts Brothers, 1876.Google Scholar
Collins, K. K. “G. H. Lewes Revised: George Eliot and the Moral Sense.” Victorian Studies 21.4 (1978): 463–92.Google Scholar
Creeger, George R. “An Interpretation of Adam Bede.” ELH 23 (1956): 218–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Michael. George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Psychology: Exploring the Unmapped Country. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Dolin, Timothy. George Eliot. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2005.Google Scholar
Dowling, Andrew. “’The Other Side of Silence’: Matrimonial Conflict and the Divorce Court in George Eliot's Fiction.” Nineteenth Century Literature 50.3 (1995): 322–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliot, George. Adam Bede. 1859. Ed. Martin, Carol A.. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliot, George. “Evangelical Teaching: Dr. Cumming.” [Anonymous] Westminster Review 64 (October 1855): 436–62.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. The George Eliot Letters. Ed. Haight, Gordon S.. 9 vols. Yale: Yale UP, 1954–78.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Middlemarch. Ed. David Carroll. Introduction by Felicia Bonaparte. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. [Review of R. W. Mackay, The Progress of the Intellect.] Westminster and Foreign Quarterly Review 54 (Jan. 1851): 353–68.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. “Translations and Translators.” The Leader 20 Oct. 1855.Google Scholar
Elfenbein, Andrew. “Cognitive Science and the History of Reading.” PMLA 121.2 (2006): 484–502.Google Scholar
Ewerbeck, Hermann. Qu'est-ce que La Religion, d'après la Nouvelle Philosophie Allemande [What is Religion, according to the New German Philosophy]. Paris: Ladrange, 1850.Google Scholar
Feuerbach, Ludwig. The Essence of Christianity. 1841. Trans. Marian Evans. 1854. 3rd ed. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co., 1893.Google Scholar
Feuerbach, Ludwig. The Essence of Religion [“L'Essence de la Religion”]. 1845. Trans. Ewerbeck, Hermann. Qu'est-ce que La Religion, d'après la Nouvelle Philosophie Allemande. Paris: Ladrange, 1850.Google Scholar
Feuerbach, Ludwig. Das Wesen des Christenthums. 1841. 2nd ed. Leipzig: Verlag von Otto Wigand, 1848.Google Scholar
Frow, John. “‘Reproducibles, Rubrics, and Everything You Need’: Genre Theory Today.” PMLA 122.5 (2007): 1626–34.Google Scholar
Goode, John. “Adam Bede” Critical Essays on George Eliot. Ed. Hardy, Barbara. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970. 19–41.Google Scholar
Guizot, M.Meditations on the Essence of Christianity and the Religious Questions of the Day. London: John Murray, 1864.Google Scholar
Helmstadter, R. J. “The Nonconformist Conscience.” Religion in Victorian Britain, Volume IV: Interpretations. Ed. Parsons, Gerald. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1989. 61–95.Google Scholar
Heyns, Michael. Expulsion in the Nineteenth-Century Novel: The Scapegoat in English Realist Fiction. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1999.Google Scholar
Hill, Susan E. “Translating Feuerbach, Constructing Morality: The Theological and Literary Significance of Translation for George Eliot.” Journal of American Academy of Religion 65.3 (1997): 635–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, Boyd. The Age of Atonement: The Influence of Evangelicalism on Social and Economic Thought, 1785–1865. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, Walter E. Introduction. The Wellesley Index to Victorian Periodicals: 1824–1900. Ed. Houghton, Walter E. and Houghton, Esther Rhoads. Vol. 3. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1979. xiii–xvii.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. 1790. Ed. Pluhar, Werner S.. 3rd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Meiklejohn, J. M. D.. London: Henry G. Bohn, 1855.Google Scholar
Knoepflmacher, U. C.Religious Humanism and the Victorian Novel: George Eliot, Walter Pater, and Samuel Butler. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1965.Google Scholar
Krueger, Christine L.The Reader's Repentence: Women Preachers, Women Writers, and Nineteenth-Century Social Discourse. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1992.Google Scholar
Levine, George. Realism, Ethics, and Secularism: Essays on Victorian Literature and Science. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, George. The Realistic Imagination: English Fiction from Frankenstein to Lady Chatterley. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1981.Google Scholar
Lewes, George Henry. The Physical Basis of Mind: Being the Second Series of Problems of Life and Mind. London: Trübner, 1877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallock, W. H.[Unsigned Review of Impressions of Theophrastus Such.] Edinburgh Review 40 (October 1879): 557–86.Google Scholar
Martin, Carol A.George Eliot's Serial Fiction. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 1994.Google Scholar
Nadel, Lynn. “Consolidation: The Demise of the Fixed Trace.” The Science of Memory: Concepts. Ed. Rodeiger, H. L., Dudai, Y., and Fitzpatrick, S. M.. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2007. 177–82.Google Scholar
Osborne, Grant R.The Hermeneutical Spiral. 2nd ed. Madison, Wisconsin: InterVarsity P, 2006.Google Scholar
Qualls, Barry. “George Eliot and Religion.” The Cambridge Companion to George Eliot. Ed. Levine, George. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. 119–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sara, Susan J. “Retrieval and Reconsolidation: Toward a Neurobiology of Remembering.” Learning and Memory 7 (2000): 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, Victor, and Whitla, William, eds. Essays and Reviews: The 1860 Text and Its Reading. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 2000.Google Scholar
Strauss, David Friedrich. The Life of Jesus. 1835. Trans. Eliot, George [unsigned]. London: Chapman, 1846.Google Scholar
Taylor, Dennis. Hardy's Literary Language and Victorian Philology. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Theism.” [Anonymous Review of Tulloch's Theism.] Westminster Review 64 (October 1855): 319–53.Google Scholar
Tulloch, John. Theism: The Witness of Reason and Revelation to an All-wise and Beneficent Creator. London: Blackwood, 1855.Google Scholar
Uglow, Jennifer. George Eliot. New York: Pantheon, 1987.Google Scholar
Wainwright, Valerie. Ethics and the English Novel from Austen to Forster. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. The Country and the City. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1973.Google Scholar
Wright, T. R.The Religion of Humanity: The Impact of Comtean Positivism on Victorian Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986.Google Scholar