Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-14T06:28:45.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction: histories of Cold War cities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2015

MATTHEW FARISH
Affiliation:
Department of Geography and Planning, University of Toronto, 5047–100 St George Street, Toronto ON, CanadaM5S3G3
DAVID MONTEYNE
Affiliation:
Faculty of Environmental Design, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, Canada

Extract

The guest editors for this special issue of Urban History are both Canadian, and for many Canadians the hottest conflict of the Cold War might have been the 1972 ‘Summit Series’, eight hockey games played between the Russian Red Army team and an all-star cast of Canadian professionals. Without delving into the sporting glories of the series (Canada won it, four games to three, with one tie), we can aver that the event was as much about diplomacy, national identity and political-economic rivalry in the context of the Cold War as it was about skating and scoring.

Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For a play-by-play description of the 1972 games and surrounding events, including the photographs described, see Macfarlane, J., Twenty-Seven Days in September (Ottawa, 1973)Google Scholar. For comparison, see the recent work on hockey and the Cold War: Soares, J., ‘Cold War, hot ice: international ice hockey, 1947–1980’, Journal of Sport History, 34 (2007), 207–30Google Scholar; and Working Papers published by the Wilson Center, at www.wilsoncenter.org/publication-series/cwihp-working-paper-series, including Oldrich Tuma et al., ‘The (inter-communist) Cold War on ice: Soviet–Czechoslovak ice hockey politics, 1967–1969’ (no. 69, 2014), which details the celebrations of a Czech victory over the Russian hockey team shortly after the ‘Prague Spring’.

2 The touchstone for the recent turn toward a more global approach is Westad, O.A., The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the Making of our Times (Cambridge, 2006)Google Scholar. Another exemplary title is Cullather, N., The Hungry World: America's Cold War Battle against Poverty in Asia (Cambridge, MA, 2010)Google Scholar.

3 McEnaney, Laura, Civil Defense Begins at Home: Militarization Meets Everyday Life in the 1950s (Princeton, 2000)Google Scholar. Our own contributions are summed up in Monteyne, D., Fallout Shelter: Designing for Civil Defense in the Cold War (Minneapolis, 2011)Google Scholar, and Farish, M., The Contours of America's Cold War (Minneapolis, 2010), especially ch. 5Google Scholar. Other important studies in this vein include Dudley, M.Q., ‘Sprawl as strategy: city planners face the bomb’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21 (2001), 5263Google Scholar; Galison, P., ‘War against the center’, Grey Room, 4 (2001), 533CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zarlengo, K., ‘Civilian threat, the suburban citadel, and atomic age American women’, Signs, 24 (1999), 925–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 See, for instance, Graham, S. (ed.), Cities, War, and Terrorism: Towards an Urban Geopolitics (Oxford, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Marcuse, P., ‘Urban form and globalization after September 11th: the view from New York’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26 (2002), 596606CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sorkin, M. (ed.), Indefensible Space: The Architecture of the National Insecurity State (New York, 2008)Google Scholar.

5 On that capital city, see Krugler, D.F., This is Only a Test: How Washington D.C. Prepared for Nuclear War (New York, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.