Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T05:56:55.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

River Co-governance and Co-management in Aotearoa New Zealand: Enabling Indigenous Ways of Knowing and Being

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2020

Karen Fisher Open the ORCID record for Karen Fisher [Opens in a new window]  and
Meg Parsons
Karen Fisher*
Affiliation:
School of Environment, University of Auckland (New Zealand).
Meg Parsons
Affiliation:
School of Environment, University of Auckland (New Zealand). Email: meg.parsons@auckland.ac.nz.
*
Email: k.fisher@auckland.ac.nz (corresponding author).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Legislation emerging from Treaty of Waitangi settlements provide Māori, the Indigenous people of Aotearoa New Zealand, with new opportunities to destabilize and decolonize the colonial knowledge, processes and practices that contribute towards negative material and metaphysical impacts on their rohe [traditional lands and waters]. In this article we focus our attention on the Nga Wai o Maniapoto (Waipa River) Act 2012 and the Deed of Settlement signed between the Crown (the New Zealand government) and Ngāti Maniapoto (the tribal group with ancestral authority over the Waipā River) as an example of how the law in Aotearoa New Zealand is increasingly stretched beyond settler-colonial confines to embrace legal and ontological pluralism. We illustrate how this Act serves as the foundation upon which Ngāti Maniapoto are seeking to restore, manage, and enhance the health of their river. Such legislation, we argue, provides a far higher degree of recognition of Māori rights and interests both as an outcome of the settlement process and by strengthening provisions under the Resource Management Act 1991 regarding the role of Māori in resource management. We conclude by suggesting that co-governance and co-management arrangements hold great potential for transforming river management by recognizing and accommodating ontological and epistemological pluralism, which moves Aotearoa New Zealand closer to achieving sustainable and just river futures for all.

Keywords

Co-governanceCo-managementNew ZealandMāoriRiver managementOntological pluralism
Type
Symposium Article
Information
Transnational Environmental Law , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , November 2020 , pp. 455 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

This contribution is part of a collection of articles growing out of a Research Workshop on ‘Indigenous Water Rights in Comparative Law’, held at the University of Canterbury School of Law, Christchurch (New Zealand), on 7 Dec. 2018, funded by the New Zealand Law Foundation.

We would like to thank three anonymous TEL reviewers for their thoughtful engagement with this article and their insightful reviews. We also thank Elizabeth Macpherson and Julia Torres for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this article.

References

1 Berry, K.A. et al. , ‘Reconceptualising Water Quality Governance to Incorporate Knowledge and Values: Case Studies from Australian and Brazilian Indigenous Communities’ (2018) 11(1) Water Alternatives, pp. 40–60Google Scholar; Jackson, S., ‘Water and Indigenous Rights: Mechanisms and Pathways of Recognition, Representation, and Redistribution’ (2018) 5(6) WIREs: Water online articles, e1314, pp. 1–15Google Scholar, available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wat2.1314; Sullivan, A., ‘Politics, Indigenous Rights and Resource Ownership: Māori Customary Rights to the Foreshore, Seabed and Fresh Water in New Zealand’ (2017) 3(2) Studies in Arts and Humanities, pp. 39–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 N.J. Wilson, ‘“Seeing Water Like a State?”: Indigenous Water Governance through Yukon First Nation Self-Government Agreements’ (2019) Geoforum, pp. 101–13; Wilson, N.J., ‘Querying Water Co-governance: Yukon First Nations and Water Governance in the Context of Modern Land Claim Agreements’ (2020) 13(1) Water Alternatives, pp. 93–118Google Scholar.

3 McGregor, D., ‘Traditional Knowledge and Water Governance: The Ethic of Responsibility’ (2014) 10(5) AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, pp. 493–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ruru, J.D.K. Morris & J., ‘Giving Voice to Rivers: Legal Personality as a Vehicle for Recognising Indigenous Peoples’ Relationships to Water?’ (2010) 14(2) Australian Indigenous Law Review, pp. 49–62Google Scholar; Curran, D., ‘Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism’ (2019) 11(3) Water, article no. 571, pp. 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/3/571; Jackson, n. 1 above.

4 Hinojosa-Valencia, J. Budds & L., ‘Restructuring and Rescaling Water Governance in Mining Contexts: The Co-production of Waterscapes in Peru’ (2012) 5(1) Water Alternatives, pp. 119–37Google Scholar; Jackson, S. & Barber, M., ‘Historical and Contemporary Waterscapes of North Australia: Indigenous Attitudes to Dams and Water Diversions’ (2016) 8(4) Water History, pp. 385–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 We acknowledge the inconsistency in the spelling of Waipa/Waipā, which is a reflection of inconsistencies in the spelling of Māori words more generally. We use Waipa as it appears in documents and materials produced by others. We use Waipā in work we have produced directly and documents produced more recently by, and on behalf of Ngāti Maniapoto in recognition that this spelling reflects the convention of Ngāti Maniapoto.

6 Bambridge, T., The Rahui: Legal Pluralism in Polynesian Traditional Management of Resources and Territories (ANU Press, 2016)Google Scholar; Curran, n. 3 above, p. 10; Tatum, J. Hendry & M.L., ‘Justice for Native Nations: Insights from Legal Pluralism’ (2018) 60(91) Arizona Law Review, pp. 92–113Google Scholar; Jones, C., New Treaty, New Tradition: Reconciling New Zealand and Maori Law (UBC Press, 2016)Google Scholar.

7 Curran, n. 3 above, p. 3; Simms, R. et al. , ‘Navigating the Tensions in Collaborative Watershed Governance: Water Governance and Indigenous Communities in British Columbia, Canada’ (2016) 73 Geoforum, pp. 6–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar; von der Porten, S. & de Loë, R.C., ‘Collaborative Approaches to Governance for Water and Indigenous Peoples: A Case Study from British Columbia, Canada’ (2013) 50(1) Geoforum, pp. 149–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Curran, n. 3 above, p. 5.

9 Ibid.

10 A. Baum, ‘Mni Wiconi (Water is Life): Knowledge, Power and Resistance at Standing Rock’ (2019) Ideas from IDS: Graduate Papers from 2017/18, p. 9; Gilio-Whitaker, D., As Long as Grass Grows: The Indigenous Fight for Environmental Justice from Colonization to Standing Rock (Beacon Press, 2019)Google Scholar; LeQuesne, T., ‘Petro-hegemony and the Matrix of Resistance: What Can Standing Rock's Water Protectors Teach Us about Organizing for Climate Justice in the United States?’ (2019) 5(2) Environmental Sociology, pp. 188–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Whyte, K.P., ‘The Dakota Access Pipeline, Environmental Injustice, and U.S. Colonialism’ (2017) 19(1) Red Ink: An International Journal of Indigenous Literature, Arts, & Humanities, pp. 154–69Google Scholar.

11 McGregor, n. 3 above, p. 495; Wilson, N.J. & Inkster, J., ‘Respecting Water: Indigenous Water Governance, Ontologies, and the Politics of Kinship on the Ground’ (2018) 1(4) Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, pp. 516–38Google Scholar; Castleden, H. et al. , ‘Reconciliation and Relationality in Water Research and Management in Canada: Implementing Indigenous Ontologies, Epistemologies, and Methodologies’, in S. Renzetti & D.P. Dupont (eds), Water Policy and Governance in Canada (Springer, 2017), pp. 69–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Wilson (2019), n. 2 above, p. 102.

13 M. Bargh, ‘Submission on Water Issues in Aotearoa New Zealand’, Submission to Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, 2007, available at: https://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/water/contributions/civilsociety/WatersubmissionIndigenousTrust.pdf; Bollen, C., ‘Managing the Adverse Effects of Intensive Farming on Waterways in New Zealand: Regional Approaches to the Management of Non-point Source Pollution’ (2015) 19 New Zealand Journal of Environmental Law, pp. 207–39Google Scholar; Knight, C., New Zealand's Rivers: An Environmental History (Canterbury University Press, 2016)Google Scholar; Strang, V., ‘The Taniwha and the Crown: Defending Water Rights in Aotearoa/New Zealand’ (2014) 1(1) WIREs: Water online articles, pp. 121–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wat2.1002.

14 Ministry for the Environment & Statistics New Zealand, ‘Environment Aotearoa 2019’, Apr. 2019, available at: https://www.mfe.govt.nz/environment-aotearoa-2019; Aho, L. Te, ‘Te Mana o Te Wai: An Indigenous Perspective on Rivers and River Management’ (2018) 12(10) River Research Application, pp. 1615–21Google Scholar.

15 McCormick, A., Fisher, K. & Brierley, G., ‘Quantitative Assessment of the Relationships among Ecological, Morphological and Aesthetic Values in a River Rehabilitation Initiative’ (2015) 153(1) Journal of Environmental Management, pp. 60–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Salmond, A., Tadaki, M. & Gregory, T., ‘Enacting New Freshwater Geographies: Te Awaroa and the Transformative Imagination.’ (2014) 70(1) New Zealand Geographer, pp. 47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tadaki, M. & Sinner, J., ‘Measure, Model, Optimise: Understanding Reductionist Concepts of Value in Freshwater Governance’ (2014) 51 Geoforum, pp. 140–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 S. Barns, J. Henry & E. Reed, ‘Community Held Values of Rivers, Lakes and Streams in the Waikato and Waipa River Catchments’, Waikato Regional Council Technical Report 2013/31, 2013; N. Preston, ‘Waikato and Waipa Rivers Fail First Health Test’, NZ Herald, 22 Mar. 2016, available at: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11609970.

17 K.R. Howe, ‘Missionaries, Maoris, and “Civilisation” in the Upper-Waikato, 1833–1863: A Study in Culture Contact, with Special Reference to the Attitudes and Activities of the Reverend John Morgan of Otawhao’ (M.A. thesis, University of Auckland, 1970); J. Morgan, ‘Reverend John Morgan to Browne, 29 December 1864, Gore Browne 1/2d, Archives New Zealand, Wellington’ (1864).

18 Denyer, K. & Robertson, H., ‘Wetlands of New Zealand’, in C.M. Finlayson et al. (eds), The Wetland Book (Springer Netherlands, 2016), pp. 1–15Google Scholar.

19 M. Tauriki et al., Ngāti Maniapoto Mana Motuhake Report for Ngāti Maniapoto Claimants and the Waitangi Tribunal (Crown Forestry Rental Trust, 2012).

20 Nga Wai o Maniapoto (Waipa River) Act 2012 (NZ), preamble, para.10.

21 Hill, R., ‘Sediment Management in the Waikato Region, New Zealand’ (2011) 50(1) Journal of Hydrology, pp. 227–40Google Scholar.

22 Waikato Regional Council, Waipā Catchment Plan (Waikato Regional Council, 2014), available at: https://www.waikatoregion.govt.nz/council/policy-and-plans/waipa-catchment-plan.

23 Nalau, M. Parsons & J., ‘Historical Analogies as Tools in Understanding Transformation’ (2016) 38 Global Environmental Change, pp. 82–96Google Scholar.

24 V. Braun & V. Clarke, Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners (SAGE, 2013); V. Clarke & V. Braun, ‘Thematic Analysis’, in Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, (Springer, 2014), pp. 6626–28.

25 H.M. Mead, Tikanga Māori (Revd Edn): Living by Māori Values (Huia Publishers, 2016); J. Ruru, ‘First Laws: Tikanga Māori in/and the Law’ (2018) 49 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, pp. 211–28; Jones, n. 6 above.

26 Durie, E.T., ‘Custom Law: Address to the New Zealand Society for Legal and Social Philosophy’ (1994) 24 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, pp. 325–31Google Scholar.

27 Ibid., p. 327.

28 R. Mulgan, ‘Commentary on Chief Judge Durie's Custom Law Paper from the Perspective of a Pakeha Political Scientist (unpublished paper, Law Commission)’ (1997), p. 2.

29 Orange, C., The Treaty of Waitangi (Bridget Williams Books, 2015)Google Scholar.

30 Ibid.

31 M. Parsons et al., ‘Disrupting Path Dependency: Making Room for Indigenous Knowledge in River Management’ (2019) 56 Global Environmental Change, pp. 95–113.

32 J. Belich, Making Peoples: A History of the New Zealanders, from Polynesian Settlement to the End of the Nineteenth Century (Penguin Press, 1996); Orange, n. 29 above; Waitangi Tribunal, He Whakaputanga me te Tiriti: The Declaration and the Treaty. The Report on Stage 1 of the Te Paparahi o Te Raki Inquiry (Legislation Direct, 2014).

33 R. Boast, Buying the Land, Selling the Land: Governments and Māori Land in the North Island 1865–1921 (Victoria University Press, 2008); V. O'Malley, The Great War for New Zealand: Waikato 1800–2000 (Bridget Williams Books, 2016).

34 S. Dorsett, Juridical Encounters: Māori and the Colonial Courts, 1840–1852 (Auckland University Press, 2017), p. 273.

35 A. Ballara, Iwi: The Dynamics of Māori Tribal Organisation from C.1769 to C.1945 (Victoria University Press, 1998); Boast, n. 33 above; D.V. Williams, ‘Te Kooti Tango Whenua’: The Native Land Court 1864–1909 (Huia Publishers, 1999).

36 M. Belgrave, Dancing with the King: The Rise and Fall of the King Country, 1864–1885 (Auckland University Press, 2017); Waitangi Tribunal, Te Mana Whatu Ahuru: Report on Te Rohe Po¯tae Claims Pre-Publication Version Parts I and II (unpublished, 2018).

37 G. Park, ‘Effective Exclusion? An Exploratory Overview of Crown Actions and Māori Responses Concerning the Indigenous Flora and Fauna, 1912–1983’, Waitangi Tribunal, Wai 262#K4, 2001; J. Ruru & N. Wheen, ‘Providing for Rāhui in the Law of Aotearoa New Zealand’, in T. Tamatoa (ed.), Legal Pluralism in Polynesian Traditional Management of Resources and Territories, 1st edn, (ANU Press, 2016), pp. 195–210; Strang, n. 13 above.

38 Hursthouse, C.F., New Zealand: The ‘Britain of the South’ (Stanford, 1861)Google Scholar.

39 E.J. Best, ‘E. J. Best to Mr Jennings, MP, 7 April 1909’, Te Kawa Swamp, Protest against Drainage (Effects of Eel Weirs), MA1 973, National Archives, Wellington (NZ); M. Fisher, ‘Handwritten Note Fisher to Grace’, 14 Jan. 1909, Te Kawa Swamp, Protest against Drainage (Effects of Eel Weirs), MA1 973, National Archives, Wellington (NZ).

40 Dorsett, n. 34 above.

41 Hone Te Anga v. Kawa Drainage Board (1914) 33 New Zealand Law Reports, p. 1139.

42 Best, n. 39 above; Fisher, n. 39 above; G. Park, ‘Swamps which Might Doubtless Easily Be Drained: Swamp Drainage and Its Impact on the Indigenous’, in E. Pawson & T. Brooking (eds), Environmental Histories of New Zealand (Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 176–85; Waikato Valley Authority, ‘Borough Works and Estimates, c. 1960, BAAS 5113 A362 21a, Archives New Zealand, Auckland’ (1960).

43 N. Te Koro, ‘Letter from Ngawere Te Koro and Others to Thomas Fisher’, 23 Oct. 1908, Te Kawa Swamp, Protest against Drainage (Effects of Eel Weirs), MA1 973, Archives New Zealand, Wellington (NZ).

44 Bamford & Brown, ‘Letter: Bamford & Brown to Kawa Drainage Board Clerk, 4 December 1909, BCDG A1492 Box 1, A16, Archives New Zealand, Auckland’ (1909).

45 Ibid.

46 H.D. Bamford, ‘Sworn Statement of Harry Dean Bamford, 13 May 1910, para 5. BCDG A1492 Box 1, A16, Archives New Zealand, Auckland’ (1910); ‘Kawa Drainage Board: 11 May 1910’ (1910) King Country Chronicle, p. 3.

47 Land Drainage Act (1908).

48 ‘Eel Swamp or Dairy Farm: 6 June 1914’ (1914) Waikato Times, p. 2.

49 Ibid.; ‘The Eel Pa Case: 12 June 1914’ (1914) Waikato Argus, p. 2.

50 Hone Te Anga v. Kawa Drainage Board, n. 41 above.

51 J. Ruru, ‘Property Rights and Maori: A Right to Own a River?’, paper presented at the New Zealand Centre of Environmental Law Conference ‘Property Rights and Sustainability: The Evolution of Property Rights to Meet Ecological Challenges’, Auckland (NZ), 16–18 Apr. 2009; A. Salmond, Tears of Rangi: Experiments Across Worlds (Auckland University Press, 2017); G. Tipa et al., ‘Policy Responses to the Identification by Maori of Flows Necessary to Maintain Their Cultural Values’, in Proceedings of the 37th Hydrology & Water Resources Symposium 2016 ‘Water, Infrastructure and the Environment’, Queenstown (NZ), 28 Nov.–2 Dec. 2016 (Engineers Australia, 2016), p. 552.

52 Raukete te Hara, ‘Received: 4th September 1915 – From: Native Affairs Committee, House of Representatives. Subject: Petition No. 237/15 Raukete te Hara and 27 others. For Return of Land Taken into Rangitaiki Drainage Area’ (1916); AJHR, ‘G-06f Native Land Amendment and Native Land Claims Adjustment Act, 1922. Report on Petition No. 187/1922. Appendices of the Journal of the House of Representatives’, in New Zealand Parliament, 1923; M. Davis, ‘Orahiri No. 4 Traces of Minutes from Otorohanga Minute Block, Attached to Letter Whaanga to Henry, 11 September 1970, 86(37), C 579 315, Archives New Zealand, Wellington’ (1963).

53 Kowhai Consulting Ltd, He Mahere Taiao: The Maniapoto Iwi Environmental Management Plan (Kowhai Consulting Ltd, 2007).

54 Kowhai Consulting Ltd & Ministry for the Environment, Te Purongo: Ngati Maniapoto State of the Environment Report: A Tribal Perspective, 2002 (Kowhai Consulting Ltd, 2002), p. 7.

55 Ibid., pp. 7, 11.

56 Ibid.

57 Nga Wai o Maniapoto (Waipa River) Act (2012) (NZ).

58 Salmond, n. 51 above, p. 300.

59 Ibid.; G. Tipa, ‘Exploring Indigenous Understandings of River Dynamics and River Flows: A Case from New Zealand’ (2009) 3(1) Environmental Communication, pp. 95–120; G. Tipa & L.D. Teirney, A Cultural Health Index for Streams and Waterways: Indicators for Recognising and Expressing Māori Values (Ministry for the Environment, 2003).

60 Iwi Rep. 8, Interview with Iwi Representative 8, 9 Oct. 2019.

61 G. Harmsworth, S. Awatere & M. Robb, ‘Indigenous Māori Values and Perspectives to Inform Freshwater Management in Aotearoa-New Zealand’ (2016) 21(4) Ecology and Society online articles, article 9, available at: https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol21/iss4/art9.

62 Panelli, R. & Tipa, G., ‘Placing Well-being: A Maori Case Study of Cultural and Environmental Specificity’ (2007) 4(4) EcoHealth, pp. 445–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 Salmond, n. 51 above, p. 299.

64 Harris, A., Hīkoi: Forty Years of Māori Protest (Huia Publishers, 2004)Google Scholar.

65 Ibid.

66 Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 No. 114 (NZ).

67 Jones, n. 6 above; E.K. Williams, E.M. Watene-Rawiri & G.T. Tipa, ‘Empowering Indigenous Community Engagement and Approaches in Lake Restoration: An Āotearoa-New Zealand Perspective’, in D.P. Hamilton et al. (eds), Lake Restoration Handbook (Springer, 2018), pp. 495–531.

68 N.R. Wheen & J. Hayward, Treaty of Waitangi Settlements (Bridget Williams Books, 2012); S. Ellison et al., Wai 898 A99 Tainui Oral and Traditional Historical Report (Crown Forestry Rental Trust, 2012).

69 J. Luiten, Local Government in Te Rohe Potae (Waitangi Tribunal, 2011); C. Marr, Te Rohe Potae Political Engagement 1864–1886: A Report Commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal for the Te Rohe Potae District Inquiry (Waitangi Tribunal, 2011).

70 Her Majesty the Queen in right of New Zealand & Waikato-Tainui, Deed of Settlement in relation to the Waikato River, 17 Dec. 2009, available at: https://www.waikatoregion.govt.nz/assets/PageFiles/14763/WaikatoRiverDOSDec09.pdf; Ngati Tuwharetoa, Raukawa, and Te Arawa River Iwi Waikato River Act 2010 (NZ); Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010 (NZ).

71 Nga Wai o Maniapoto (Waipa River) Act (2012) (NZ).

72 Maniapoto & The Maniapoto Maori Trust Board & The Sovereign in right of New Zealand, Deed in relation to Co-governance and Co-management of the Waipa River, 27 Sept. 2010, available at: https://www.maniapoto.iwi.nz/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/maniapoto_deed_final_270910.pdf.

73 Maniapoto & The Maniapoto Maori Trust Board & The Sovereign in right of New Zealand, Waiwaia Accord, 27 Sept. 2010, available at: https://www.govt.nz/assets/Documents/OTS/Ngati-Maniapoto-Waipa-River/Ngati-Maniapoto-Waiwaia-Accord-27-Sep-2010.pdf.

74 Te Urewera Act 2014 (NZ); Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017 (NZ).

75 Ruru, n. 25 above; J. Ruru, ‘Listening to Papatūānuku: A Call to Reform Water Law’ (2018) 48(2–3) Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, pp. 215–24; Morris & Ruru, n. 3 above.

76 Nga Wai o Maniapoto (Waipa River) Act 2010 (NZ); Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010; Ngati Tuwharetoa, Raukawa, and Te Arawa River Iwi Waikato River Act 2010.

77 Deed in Relation to Co-governance and Co-management of the Waipa River, n. 72 above.

78 Nga Wai o Maniapoto (Waipa River) Act 2012 (NZ), s. 3.

79 Salmond, n. 51 above; M. Dodd, ‘Effects of Industry on Maori Cultural Values: The Case of the Tarawera River’ (2010) Indigenous Voices, Indigenous Research, pp. 53–63; Kolig, E., ‘Freedom, Identity Construction and Cultural Closure: The Taniwha, the Hijab and the Wiener Schnitzel as Boundary Markers’, in E. Rata, R. Openshaw & J. Friedman (eds), Public Policy and Ethnicity: The Politics of Ethnic Boundary Making (Springer, 2007), pp. 25–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

80 L. Te Aho, ‘Indigenous Laws and Aspirations for a Sustainable World’, in L. Westra & M. Vilela (eds), The Earth Charter, Ecological Integrity and Social Movements (Routledge, 2014), pp. 169–80; Parsons, M., Nalau, J. & Fisher, K., ‘Alternative Perspectives on Sustainability: Indigenous Knowledge and Methodologies’ (2017) 5(1) Challenges in Sustainability, pp. 7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

81 Waikato-Tainui Raupatu (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2012, s. 17.

82 Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010 (NZ).

83 Iwi Rep. 5, Interview with Iwi Representative 5, 25 Mar. 2019.

84 Ruru, J., ‘Indigenous Restitution in Settling Water Claims: The Developing Cultural and Commercial Redress Opportunities in Aotearoa, New Zealand’ (2013) 22(2) Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, pp. 311–52, at 334Google Scholar.

85 Iwi Rep. 8, Interview with Iwi Representative 8, 9 Oct. 2019; Iwi Rep. 1, Interview with Iwi Representative 1, 29 Sept. 2017; Iwi Rep. 2, Interview with Iwi Representative 2, 13 Feb. 2020; Iwi Rep. 3, Interview with Iwi Representative 3, 13 Feb. 2020; Iwi Rep. 4, Interview with Iwi Representative 4, 14 Feb. 2020.

86 Nga Wai o Maniapoto (Waipa River) Act (2012).

87 E. Watene-Rawiri, J. Kukutai & MMTB, ‘He Mahere Ika: Maniapoto Upper Waipā River Fisheries Plan 2015’, 30 Mar. 2016.

88 MMTB, ‘Ko Tā Maniapoto Mahere Taiao: Maniapoto Environmental Management Plan’, 29 Mar. 2016, available at: https://www.waitomo.govt.nz/media/wjkfi0qm/appendix-p-maniapoto-iwi-management-plan.pdf.

89 National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd, ‘Maniapoto Priorities for the Restoration of the Waipā River Catchment’, Dec. 2014, available at: https://www.waikatoregion.govt.nz/assets/WRC/Community/Iwi/Maniapoto-Priorities-for-the-Waipa-River.pdf; Waikato Regional Council, n. 22 above.

90 O'Bryan, K., Indigenous Rights and Water Resource Management: Not Just Another Stakeholder (Routledge, 2018), p. 195CrossRefGoogle Scholar.