Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T08:24:15.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ALLIANCES AND MISALLIANCES IN THE POLITICS OF THE UNION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2002

Abstract

THE Union has been little studied; its undoing on the other hand has been much debated. One reason for the contrast is of course that the Union was later seen by many as uncongenial; another was that the methods of securing it seemed on a universal telling clear cut: it was, or so it was said, achieved by corruption and was intensely unpopular. In Lecky's view, for instance, `The measure was an English one, carried without a dissolution and by gross corruption, in opposition to the majority of the free constituencies and to the great preponderance of the unbribed intellect of Ireland.'

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lecky,History of Ireland, vol.v, 422. There is in Lecky's writing a very evident tendency to magnify the significance and scale of hostility expressed against the Union. Thus, meetings in January 1800 against the Union were described by him as ‘great’, and as lacking a denominational character (ibid., pp. 353, 354). Large numbers signing petitions against the Union have been stressed by him, and by others, and Lecky claimed that except in Galway pro-Union supporters did not take the initiative in organising a county meeting (ibid. pp. 313, 314, 354).