Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T07:25:03.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proposals for the Statutory Basis of Valuation of the Liabilities of Long-Term Insurance Business

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2014

R. P. Bews ,
P. A. C. Seymour ,
A. N. D. Shaw  and
F. R. Wales
Get access

Synopsis

The Authors are members of a Working Party established by the Councils of the Faculty and Institute to consider the Department of Trade's proposed Rules for valuing the liabilities of long-term business.

The paper opens with a short introduction followed by Part 2 which considers the control systems operating in several overseas territories. Part 3 is largely historical and traces the development of actuarial thought and practice since the war. The negotiations in Europe are also covered. Having set the scene, the Authors move to consideration of the Department of Trade's proposals (the proposed Rules for valuation of liabilities are included as an Appendix to the Paper). After a brief description of the proposed Asset Value Regulations in Part 4 the net premium valuation method is discussed in Part 5 and the problems of large fluctuations in the interest basis are illustrated by examples. Possible modifications to the conventional formula are explored with further examples. The elements of the valuation basis are discussed in turn with particular emphasis on the valuation rate of interest.

The Authors conclude that the problems arising from use of high rates of interest in valuation are not so much a function of the inadequacy of the valuation method as an indication of the real financial strains to which offices are exposed in current conditions. The paper ends with a reminder that with the varied traditions of the British market no one set of Valuation Rules can satisfactorily cover every special case. Any statutory basis therefore must be seen as a compromise, and the Authors touch on special cases where they feel that it would be appropriate for the authorities to exercise their discretionary powers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Faculty of Actuaries , Volume 34 , 1973 , pp. 367 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

1.Manly, H. W.A Comparison of the Values of Policies as Found by Means of the Various Tables of Mortality and the Different Methods of Valuation in use Among Actuaries. J.I.A., 14, p. 249.Google Scholar
2.Oppé, T. H. M., F.I.A., A.S.A. The Implications for British Insurance, Particularly Long-Term Business, of Joining the European Common Market. T.F.A., 33, p. 20 and J.I.A., 97, p. 153.Google Scholar
3.Skerman, R. S., F.I.A. A Solvency Standard for Life Assurance Business. J.I.A., 92, p. 75.Google Scholar
4. The Commonwealth of Australia, Life Insurance Act 1945–1973.Google Scholar
5.Ward, G. C., M.Sc., F.I.A. A Model Office Study of a Terminal Bonus System of Full Return of Surplus to Ordinary Participating Policies. Submitted to the Institute of Actuaries of Australia and New Zealand, June 1970.Google Scholar
6. Canadian and British Insurance Companies Act 1932.Google Scholar
7.Noback, Joseph C.Life Insurance Accounting, A Study of the Financial Statements of Life Insurance Companies in the United States and Canada. Published, Richard D. Irwin, Inc. and Irwin-Dorsey Ltd.Google Scholar
8. Arrêté du Conseil Fédéral Sur L'estimation des Papiers—Valeurs au Bilan des Sociétés Suisses d‘Assurances Sur La Vie (Du 20 decembre 1971).Google Scholar
9.Haynes, A. T., F.F.A., F.I.A. and Kirton, R. J., M.A., F.I.A., A.S.A. The Financial Structure of a Life Office. T.F.A., 21, p. 141.Google Scholar
10. Redington, F. M., M.A., F.I.A. Review of the Principles of Life Office Valuations. J.I.A., 78, p. 286.Google Scholar
11.Bayley, G. V., F.I.A. and Perks, W., F.I.A. A Consistent System of Investment and Bonus Distribution for a Life Office. J.I.A., 79, p. 14.Google Scholar
12.Report of the Tribunal Appointed to Inquire into Certain Issues in Relation to the Circumstances leading up to the Cessation of Trading by the Vehicle and General Insurance Company Limited. Published, London, Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
13.Report of the Committee on Property Bonds and Equity-Linked Life Assurance. Published, London, Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
14.Financial Guarantees from Life Assurance Concerns. Published, Paris, 1971, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
15.Ammeter, Hans. The Problem of Solvency in Life Assurance. J.I.A., 92, p. 193.Google Scholar
16.Ammeter, Hans. The Natural and Mechanical Methods of Assessing Solvency Reserves in Life Assurance. J.I.A., 93, p. 79.Google Scholar
17.Sorley, J., F.I.A., F.F.A. On Expenses and Selection as Affecting the Pure Premium Method of Valuation. J.I.A., 21, p. 192.Google Scholar
18.Benjamin, S., M.A., F.I.A., F.S.S. The Theory of Games and its Application to Rate of Interest. J.I.A., 85, p. 373.Google Scholar
Sprague, T. B., M.A. How Does an Increast Mortality Affect Policy-Values? J.I.A., 21, p. 77.Google Scholar
Warner, S. G., F.I.A. Some Notes on the Net Premium Method of Valuation, as Affected by Recent Tendencies and Developments. J.I.A., 37, p. 57.Google Scholar
Suttie, T. R., F.I.A. The Treatment of Appreciation or Depreciation in the Assets of a Life Assurance Fund. J.I.A., 72, p. 203.Google Scholar
King, George, F.I.A., F.F.A. On Legislation Affecting Life Assurance Companies, More Especially With Reference to the Life Assurance Companies Acts, 1870 to 1872, and their Amendment. J.I.A., 29, p. 481.Google Scholar
Pegler, J. B. H., F.I.A. The Actuarial Principles of Investment. J.I.A., 74, p. 179.Google Scholar
Cox, P. R., F.I.A., F.S.S. and Storr-Best, R. H., F.I.A. Surplus: Two Hundred Years of Actuarial Advance. J.I.A., 89, p. 19.Google Scholar
Grant, A. T., F.F.A., F.I.A. and Kingsnorth, G. A., F.I.A. Unit Trusts and Equity Linked Endowment Assurances. T.F.A., 30, p. 17 and J.I.A., 93, p. 387.Google Scholar
Benjamin, S., M.A., F.I.A., F.S.S. Supervision of Insurance in the United Kingdom: Abstract of the Discussion. J.I.A., 98, p. 233.Google Scholar
Smith, P. R., M.A., F.I.A. More Informative Disclosure of Life Office Affairs. J.I.A., 99, p. 249.Google Scholar
Ford, A., F.I.A., F.S.A. Life Office Returns to the Department of Trade and Industry. J.I.A., 101, p. 53.Google Scholar
Springbett, T. M., F.I.A. Valuation for Surplus. T.F.A. 28, p. 231.Google Scholar
Carroll, P. M., B.A., F.I.A. The Net Premium Method of Valuation. Submitted to the Institute of Actuaries of Australia and New Zealand l, July 1974.Google Scholar
Wood, C. H. R., M.A., F.I.A. The Dutch Life Assurance Market. J.S.S., 21, p. 70.Google Scholar