Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T10:18:58.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Retirement Benefits in Continental Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2014

Get access

Synopsis

The majority of the paper is devoted to a comparison of the three principal methods which are used in Europe for the funding of private pension plans, namely: the pay-as-you-go system, book reserves and segregated pre-funding. In the commentary which follows the description of these methods, the author suggests that the book reserve system, when tied to solvency insurance, has several advantages over the other two funding methods.

The paper is also concerned with three other aspects of the provision of retirement pensions in continental European countries. These are : the size of the retirement pensions ; the age at which these retirement pensions commence ; and the methods of removing the adverse effects of inflation on such pensions. In describing the very different pension practices in each of the various European countries, the paper highlights those aspects of a country's pension provision which merit further investigation. The paper then concludes with the view that we, in the U.K., have a considerable amount to gain from a study of pension practices in Europe and that this may eventually help us to solve some of our problems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. MCE European Benefits Report 1980.Google Scholar
2. IBIS monthly reports.Google Scholar
3.Horlick, M.The impact of an ageing population on social security ; the foreign experience”, HEW publication no (SSA) 7911948.Google Scholar
4.Trowbridge, J. R.Assessmentism—an alternative to pension funding?J.I.A. 102.Google Scholar
5. ARRCO and AGIRC reports.Google Scholar
6. The Government Actuary's 1980 review of the adjustment for differences in superannuation benefits.Google Scholar