Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T07:48:33.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-Euclidean sex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2009

Michael Levin
Get access

Abstract

Perhaps there is nothing morally wrong with homosexuality. But does that mean that those who find it abhorrent should be forced to tolerate, it? Michael Levin questions some common liberal preconceptions about homosexuality, and also responds to my own ‘What's Wrong With Gay Sex?’ (which appeared in Issue 5 of Think).

Type
Research Article
Information
Think , Volume 4 , Issue 10 , Summer 2005 , pp. 7 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note

1 The number of copies of its genotype an organism leaves. To use a famous example, if A has two children and B dies childless but with five nephews, B is more inclusively fit.