Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T17:14:51.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Common Mistakes in Comparing Biblical and Scientific Maps of Origins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2017

Conrad Hyers*
Affiliation:
Retried Gustavus Adolphus College, St. Peter, MN 56082
Get access

Abstract

The history of controversy over evolution and the bible is a history of confusion between biblical and scientific approaches to origins. Taking some cues from John Calvin who, in the 16th century, addressed the emerging controversies over cosmology, the paper examines a variety of differences between biblical and scientific types of literature as they deal with cosmogony. Biblical uses of phenomenal observation, analogical reasoning, numerology, and theological critique are distinguished from the approaches to origins used in modern scientific and historical investigations. Their respective models of origins are not in conflict unless they are mistakenly seen as mapping in the same way and for the same purposes.

Type
Philosophical and Biblical Perspectives
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bailey, L. R. 1993. Genesis, Creation, and Creationism. Paulist Press, Mahwah, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Calvin, J., translated by King, John. 1948. Commentaries on the First Book of Moses Called Genesis. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, Michigan.Google Scholar
Hyers, C. 1985. The Meaning of Creation: Genesis and Modern Science. John Knox Press, Atlanta.Google Scholar