Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T13:40:48.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social capabilities–based flexicurity for a learning economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Dario Judzik ,
Haider A Khan  and
Laura T Spagnolo
Dario Judzik*
Affiliation:
Ministerio de Trabajo, Empleo y Seguridad Social, Argentina
Haider A Khan
Affiliation:
University of Denver, USA
Laura T Spagnolo
Affiliation:
Ministerio de Trabajo, Empleo y Seguridad Social, Argentina
*
Dario Judzik, Subsecretaría de Políticas, Estudios y Estadísticas Laborales, Ministerio de Trabajo, Empleo y Seguridad Social, Av. Leandro N. Alem 628 2° piso, 1001 Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Email: djudzik@trabajo.gob.ar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mainstream economists argue that unemployment must be tackled with ‘flexibilisation’ or ‘labour market deregulation’. The public policy application has been the principle of ‘flexicurity’, with mixed labour market outcomes and limited success. Central contributions to theoretical and empirical economics writing on unemployment issues still espouse ‘flexibilisation’ as a general approach and warn about the detrimental effects of systematic deregulation under expectations of outcomes such as lower unemployment. Departing from a review of this literature, we take a step further from the ‘flexicurity’ prescription, to follow the capabilities approach of Sen and others, and develop a concept of social capabilities – based flexicurity for a learning economy, arguing that labour market performance must be targeted in an approach that includes a strong commitment to social well-being.

Keywords

Capabilitiesflexibilityflexicurityinstitutionslabour marketunemploymentJ80J58I38
Type
Rethinking Precariousness and Flexibility
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 333 - 348
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baccaro, L and Rei, D (2007) Institutional determinants of unemployment in OECD countries: does the deregulatory view hold water? International Organization 61(3): 527–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, D, Glyn, A, Howell, DR, et al . (2005) Labour market institutions and unemployment: a critical assessment of the cross-country evidence. In: Howell, DR (ed.) Fighting Unemployment: The Limits of Free Market Orthodoxy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 72–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, J and Kucera, D (2008) In Defense of Labour Market Institutions. Geneva: International Labour Office; Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, O and Wolfers, J (2000) The role of shocks and institutions in the rise of European unemployment: the aggregate evidence. The Economic Journal 110(462): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burroni, L and Keune, M (2011) Flexicurity: a conceptual critique. European Journal of Industrial Relations 17(1): 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, DA (1992) Functioning and capability: the foundations of Sen’s and Nussbaum’s development ethic. Political Theory 20(4): 584–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daveri, F and Tabellini, G (2000) Unemployment, growth and taxation in industrial countries. Economic Policy 15(30): 47–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmeskov, J, Martin, JP and Scarpetta, S (1998) Key lessons for labour market reforms: evidence from OECD countries’ experiences. Swedish Economic Policy Review 5(2): 205–252.Google Scholar
Frame, M and Khan, HA (2007) Deep democracy: a political and social economy approach. CIRJE-F-469. Tokyo, Japan: CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo. Available at: http://www.cirje.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp/research/dp/2007/2007cf469.pdf (accessed 5 February 2016).Google Scholar
Freeman, RB (2005) Labour market institutions without blinders: the debate over flexibility and labour market performance. International Economic Journal 19(2): 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, RB (2008) Labour market institutions around the world. CEP discussion papers 844. London: Centre for Economic Performance. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.177.6032&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 5 February 2016).Google Scholar
Freeman, RB (2013) Failing the test? The flexible US job market in the Great Recession. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 650: 78–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriele, A and Khan, H (2010) China’s National Innovation System at the Cross Roads. Berlin: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Galbraith, JK (2012) Inequality and Instability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, GWF ([1821] 2005) Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts [Philosophy of Right] (trans. Dyde, SW , 1896). Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Heyes, J (2011) Flexicurity, employment protection and the jobs crisis. Work, Employment & Society 25(4): 642–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, J (2013) Flexicurity in crisis: European labour market policies in a time of austerity. European Journal of Industrial Relations 19(3): 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Labour Organization (ILO) (2015) An Employment-Oriented Investment Strategy for Europe (Studies on growth with equity). Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization (ILO) and Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) (2015) The labour share in G20 economies. Report prepared for the G20 Employment Working Group, Antalya, Turkey, February. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/g20/topics/employment-and-social-policy/The-Labour-Share-in-G20-Economies.pdf Google Scholar
Judzik, D and Sala, H (2015) The determinants of capital intensity in Japan and the US. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 35(1): 78–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, HA (1998) Technology, Development and Democracy: The Limits of National Innovation Systems in the Age of Postmodernism. Lyme, NH: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Khan, HA (2004) Innovation and Growth in East Asia: The Future of Miracles. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Khan, HA (2007a) A theory of deep democracy and economic justice in the age of postmodernism. CIRJE-F-468. Tokyo, Japan: CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo. Available at: http://www.cirje.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp/research/dp/2007/2007cf468.pdf (accessed 5 February 2016).Google Scholar
Khan, HA (2007b) Trade liberalization and poverty reduction in general equilibrium: the role of labour market structure. CIRJE-F-462. Tokyo, Japan: Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo. Available at: http://www.cirje.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp/research/dp/2007/2007cf462.pdf (accessed 5 February 2016).Google Scholar
Khan, HA (2008) Making globalization work: towards global economic justice. Cosmopolis (Winter). Available at: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/7864/1/MPRA_paper_7864.pdf (accessed 5 February 2016).Google Scholar
Khan, HA (2013a) Basel III, BIS and global financial governance. Journal of Advanced Studies in Finance IV(2(8)): 121–144.Google Scholar
Khan, HA (2013b) Development strategies: lessons from the experiences of South Korea, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam. In: Augustin, KF (ed.) Achieving Development Success. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 119–132.Google Scholar
Khan, HA (2013c) Global financial governance: towards a new global financial architecture for averting deep financial crisis. MPRA paper no. 49275. Available at: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/49275/1/MPRA_paper_49275.pdf (accessed 5 February 2016).Google Scholar
Khan, HA (2014) Development and women’s rights as human rights: a political and social economy approach within a deep democratic framework. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 42(3): 451.Google Scholar
Khan, HA and Sogabe, H (1994) Macroeconomic effects of IMF adjustment policies. In: Shepherd, GW and Sonko, GW (eds) Economic Justice in Africa: Adjustment and Sustainable Development. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, pp. 27–40.Google Scholar
Layard, R, Nickell, S and Jackman, R (1991) Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lazear, EP and Spletzer, JR (2012) The United States labour market: status quo or a new normal? NBER working papers 18386. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w18386 (accessed 5 February 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundvall, BÅ (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
Nickell, S (1997) Unemployment and labour market rigidities: Europe versus North America. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(3): 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickell, S (1998) Unemployment: questions and some answers. The Economic Journal 108(448): 802–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickell, S, Nunziata, L and Ochel, W (2005) Unemployment in the OECD since the 1960s: what do we know? The Economic Journal 115(500): 1–27.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M (1995) Poetic Justice: The Literary Imagination and Public Life. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M (2000) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) (1994) The OECD Jobs Study. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) (2004) OECD Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Piketty, T (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rinne, U and Zimmermann, KF (2013) Is Germany the north star of labour market policy? IMF Economic Review 61(4): 702–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, J (2012) The labour market four years into the crisis: assessing structural explanations. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 65(3): 437–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A (1992) Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A (1999) Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.Google Scholar
Sen, A (2004) Elements of a theory of human rights. Philosophy and Public Affairs 32(4): 315–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A ([1759] 2006) The Theory of Moral Sentiments, part 1. London: Dover Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A ([1776] 1904) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Book IV; ed Cannan, E ). London: Methuen and Co. Google Scholar
Solow, RM (1997) It ain’t the things you don’t know that hurt you, it’s the things you know that ain’t so. The American Economic Review 87(2): 107–108.Google Scholar
Stockhammer, E and Klär, E (2011) Capital accumulation, LMIs and unemployment in the medium run. Cambridge Journal of Economics 35(2): 437–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storm, S and Naastepad, CMW (2008) The NAIRU reconsidered: why labour market deregulation may raise unemployment. International Review of Applied Economics 22(5): 527–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar