Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T14:33:03.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Precarious work: Economic, sociological and political perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Shaun Wilson
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Australia; The University of New South Wales, Australia
Norbert Ebert*
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Australia
*
Norbert Ebert, Department of Sociology, Macquarie University, Balaclava Road, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia. Email: Norbert.Ebert@mq.edu.au

Abstract

This article brings together labour relations, sociological and political perspectives on precarious employment in Australia, identifying local contexts of insecurity and setting them within the economics of regional supply chains involving the use of migrant labour. In developing the concept of precarious work-societies, it argues that precarity is a source of individual and social vulnerability and distress, affecting family, housing and communal security. The concept of depoliticisation is used to describe the processes of displacement, whereby the social consequences of precarious work come to be seen as beyond the reach of agency. Using evidence from social attitudes surveys, we explore links between the resulting sense of political marginalisation and hostility to immigrants. Re-politicisation strategies will need to lay bare the common basis of shared experiences of insecurity and explore ways of integrating precarious workers into new community and global alliances.

Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2009) Australian Social Trends no. 4102 (June). Canberra, ACT, Australia: ABS. Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsfPreviousproducts/4102.0Main%20Features40June%202009?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=4102.0&issue=June%202009&num=&view= (accessed 5 August 2013).Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2013) Main Features – Young Adults: Then and Now. Canberra, ACT, Australia: ABS. Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0Main+Features40April+2013(accessed 2 July 2013).Google Scholar
Bean, C, McAllister, I, Gow, D (2008) Australian Election Study, 2007 (Computer file). Canberra, ACT, Australia: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Boese, M, Campbell, I, Roberts, W, et al. (2013) Temporary migrant nurses in Australia: sites and sources of precariousness. Economic and Labour Relations Review 24(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, SC, Houlihan, M, Laaser, K (2012) Contingent work and its contradictions: towards a moral economy framework. Journal of Business Ethics 111(1): 121132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrows, S (2013) Precarious work, neo-liberalism and young people’s experiences of employment in the Illawarra region. Economic and Labour Relations Review 24(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, P, Leach, LS, Strazdins, L, et al. (2011) The psychosocial quality of work determines whether employment has benefits for mental health: results from a longitudinal national household panel survey. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 68(11): 806812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, S (2013) ‘I am King’: Financialisation and the paradox of precarious work. Economic and Labour Relations Review 24(3): 362379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deem, R, Hillyard, S, Reed, M (2007) Knowledge, Higher Education, and the New Managerialism: The Changing Management of UK Universities. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, N (2011) Precarious work societies. (5): 610. Available at: http://economicsociology.org.au/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Exchange-issue-51.pdf Google Scholar
Ebert, N (2012) Individualisation at Work: The Self between Freedom and Social Pathologies. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, A (2012) Das Unbehagen in der Gesellschaft. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, B (2006) Bait and Switch: The Futile Pursuit of the Corporate Dream. New York: Granta Books.Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, B (2008) Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America (10 Anv.). New York: Holt Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Fairbrother, P, O’Brien, J, Junor, A, O’Donnell, M, Williams, G (2012) Unions and globalisation: Governments, management and the state at work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gavroglu, K, Stachel, J, Wartofsky, MW, Markus, MR (1995) Civil society and the politicisation of needs. In: Gavroglu, K, Stachel, J, Wartofsky, MW (eds) Science, Politics and Social Practice. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic, pp. 161179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goot, M, Watson, I (2005) Immigration, Multiculturalism, and Australian Identity, Australian Social Attitudes: The First Report. Sydney, NSW, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
Kalleberg, AL (2009) Precarious work, insecure workers: employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review 74(1): 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minagawa, Y (2013) The social consequences of postcommunist structural change: an analysis of suicide trends in Eastern Europe. Social Forces 91(3): 10351056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowsky, J, Ross, CE (2003) Social Causes of Psychological Distress. Hawthorne, NY: Transaction Publishers, Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Morgan, G, Wood, J, Nelligan, P (2013) Beyond the vocational fragments: creative work, precarious labour and the idea of ‘Flexploitation’. Economic and Labour Relations Review 24(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offe, C (1984) ‘Arbeitsgesellschaft’: Strukturprobleme und Zukunftsperspektiven. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar
Peck, J, Tickell, A (2002) Neo-liberalising space. Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography 34(3): 380404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinlan, M (2012) The ‘pre-invention’ of precarious employment: the changing world of work in context. Economic and Labour Relations Review 23(4): 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standing, G (2011) The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Stone, KVW (2012) The decline in the standard employment contract: evidence from ten advanced industrial countries. SSRN Scholarly Paper no. ID 2181082. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2181082 (accessed 2 July 2013).Google Scholar
Tweedie, D (2013) Precarious work and Australian labour norms. Economic and Labour Relations Review 24(3): 297315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velayutham, S (2013) Precarious experiences of Indians in Australia on 457 temporary work visas. Economic and Labour Relations Review 24(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vosko, FL, Zukevich, N, Cranfor, C (2003) Precarious Jobs: A New Typology of Employment. Perspectives on Labour and Income (Online ed.). Available at: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-001-x/01003/6642-eng.html (accessed 5 August 2013).Google Scholar
Williamson, OE (1981) The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes. Journal of Economic Literature 19(4): 15371568.Google Scholar
Wilson, S, Gibsin, R, Meagher, G, et al. (2005) Australian Survey of Social Attitudes, 2005 (Computer file). Canberra, ACT, Australia: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Wise, A (2013) Pyramid subcontracting and moral detachment: Down-sourcing risk and responsibility in the management of transnational labour in Asia. Economic and Labour Relations Review 24(3): 433455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, D (2013) Young people’s friendships in the context of non-standard work patterns. Economic and Labour Relations Review 24(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C (2013) The response of unions to the rise of precarious work in Britain. Economic and Labour Relations Review 24(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynhausen, E (2005) Dirt Cheap: Life at the Wrong End of the Job Market. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Pan Macmillan.Google Scholar