Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-26T22:44:57.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inter-firm power relations and working conditions under new production models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

María J Paz*
Affiliation:
Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
Mario Rísquez
Affiliation:
Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
María E Ruiz-Gálvez
Affiliation:
Rey Juan Carlos University, Spain
*
María J Paz, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain. Email: mjpazant@ucm.es

Abstract

In investigating recent changes to the automotive industry production process, such as modularisation, our work emphasises the process of fragmentation of production as a configuring element of inter-firm power relationships, and as an explanatory element in working conditions. From a theoretical framework focused on power relations, we analyse by way of a selected case study how the capabilities of companies and their network positions, together with the agency of labour, shape the power relations that influence the evolution of working conditions. The study does indeed find relevant changes to inter-firm relationships, for example, within networks of assemblers and suppliers, but without a consequent re-balancing of power. This finding serves to explain differences in the evolution of working conditions between distinct companies, these conditions being fully functional to a strategy for profitability and thus difficult to reverse.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abreu, A, Beynon, H, Ramalho, JR (2000) The Dream Factory: VW’s modular production system in Resende, Brazil. Work, Employment and Society 14(2): 265282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bair, J, Werner, M (2015) Global production and uneven development: when bringing labour in isn’t enough. In: Newsome, K, Taylor, P, Bair, J, et al. (eds) Putting Labour in Its Place: Labour Process Analysis and Global Value Chains. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 119134.Google Scholar
Boyer, R, Freyssenet, M (2000) The Productive Models: The Conditions of Profitability. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Braverman, H (1974) Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Twentieth Century.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bureau van Dijk (20152020) Orbis. Available at: https://www.bvdinfo.com/en-gb/our-products/data/international/orbis (accessed 29 September 2020).Google Scholar
CEPROSS (2016) Observatorio de Enfermedades Profesionales y de Enfermedades Causadas o Agravadas por el Trabajo. Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo, migraciones y seguridad social, España.Google Scholar
Coe, NM, Dicken, P, Hess, M (2008) Global production networks: realizing the potential. Journal of Economic Geography 8(3): 271295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coriat, B (1991) Penser à l’envers. Travail et organisation dans la firm japonaise. Paris: C. Bourgeois.Google Scholar
Cumbers, A, Nativel, C, Routledge, P (2008) Labour agency and union positionalities in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography 8(3): 369387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doellgast, V, Greer, I (2007) Vertical disintegration and the disorganisation of German industrial relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations 45(1): 5576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durand, JP (2009) La chaîne invisible: travailler aujourd’hui: flux tendu et servitude volontaire. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
Fine, CH (1998) Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage. London: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Ford, M, Guillan, M (2015) The global union federations in international industrial relations: a critical review. Journal of Industrial Relations 57(3): 456475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frigant, V (2011) Egyptian pyramid or Aztec pyramid: how should we describe the industrial architecture of automotive supply chains in Europe? Cahiers du GRETHA 2011-27: Bordeaux: Université Montesquieu. Available at: http://cahiersdugretha.u-bordeaux.fr/2011/2011-27.pdf (accessed 28 September 2020).Google Scholar
Gereffi, G, Korzeniewicz, M (1994) Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Gereffi, G, Humphrey, J, Sturgeon, T (2005) The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy 12(1): 78104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbon, P, Bair, J, Ponte, S (2008) Governing global value chains: an introduction. Economy and Society 37(3): 315338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, D, Rubery, J (2005) Inter-capital relations and the network organisation: redefining the work and employment nexus. Cambridge Journal of Economics 29(6): 10271051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J, Dicken, P, Hess, M, et al. (2002) Global production network and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy 9(3): 436464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, HC (1997) Industrial relations in the U.S. automobile industry: an illustration of increased decentralization and diversity. Economic and Labor Relations Review 8(2): 192220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakhani, T, Kuruvilla, S, Avgar, A (2013) From the firm to the network: global value chains and employment relations theory. British Journal of Industrial Relations 51(3): 440472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Las Heras, J (2019) To sign or not to sign? Union strategies towards provincial metal sector agreements in the Catalan and Basque automotive industries. European Journal of Industrial Relations 25(2): 181200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath-Champ, S, Rainnie, A, Pickren, G, et al. (2015) Global destruction networks, the labour process and employment relations. Journal of Industrial Relations 57(4): 624640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paz, MJ, Ruiz Galvez, ME (2020) Effects of modular platforms on suppliers companies: evidence from Volkswagen Polo manufacturing in Navarra (Spain). Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. Epub ahead of print 9 November. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-02-2020-0057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponte, S, Sturgeon, TJ, Dallas, MP (2019) Governance and power in global value chains. In: Ponte, S, Gereffi, G, Raj-Reichert, G (eds) Handbook on Global Value Chains. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 120137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raj-Reichert, G (2019) The role of transnational first-tier suppliers in GVC governance. In: Ponte, S, Gereffi, G, Raj-Reichert, G (eds) Handbook on Global Value Chains. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 354369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawling, M (2015) Legislative regulation of global value chains to protect workers: a preliminary assessment. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 26(4): 660677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubery, J (2007) Developing segmentation theory: a thirty-year perspective. Économies et Sociétés 28(6): 941964.Google Scholar
Rubery, J, Grimshaw, D (2003) The Organization of Employment: An International Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sacchetti, S, Sugden, R (2003) The governance of networks and economic power: the nature and impact of subcontracting relationships. Journal of Economic Surveys 17(5): 669692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selwyn, B (2013) Social upgrading and labour in global production networks: a critique and an alternative conception. Competition & Change 17(1): 7590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturgeon, TJ, Memedović, O (2011) Mapping Global Value Chains: Intermediate Goods Trade and Structural Change in the World Economy. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization.Google Scholar
Walsham, G (1995) Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems 4(2): 7481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, RK (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar