Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55b6f6c457-s8qdg Total loading time: 0.21 Render date: 2021-09-23T16:14:18.251Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Socialization to the model in adolescent cognitive behavioural therapy: measurement and insights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2017

Gerwyn Mahoney-Davies*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY
Cara Roberts-Collins
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY
Ailsa Russell
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY
Maria Loades
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr Gerwyn Mahoney-Davies, Clinical Psychologist in Training, Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY (email: Gerwyn.Mahoney-Davies@wales.nhs.uk)

Abstract

Socializing a client to the cognitive behavioural model is advised in almost every cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) textbook, but there is limited evidence for whether socialization is measurable or important. The aim of the study was to pilot a written and interview-based measure of socialization to investigate whether socialization to the model can be measured in a sample of young people who have completed CBT. Sixteen participants (mean age 14.9 years, 75% female) completed a semi-structured socialization interview and a novel written measure of socialization. Treating clinicians were asked to provide subjective ratings of participant socialization. The structure and content of these measures was examined. A moderate but non-significant correlation was found between the novel written measure of socialization and clinician rating of socialization (r = .37). The concept of ‘socialization’ is not well understood and the socialization interview presented mixed, unclear results. This may be due to issues with the design, but may also be that socialization, as currently understood, is more complex than can be captured in this way. The important aspect of this study is introducing the concept of measuring socialization and factors that may be important in future research. Socialization to the model is an important construct within CBT but at present is a challenging concept to measure. Future research will need to focus on operationalizing the concept further and refining measures so that it can be accurately captured. Understanding which therapist and client behaviours contribute to the process of socialization could conceivably improve outcomes, but this cannot be done until this area is understood more fully.

Type
Original Research Reports
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Roos, J, Wearden, A (2009). What do we mean by ‘socialization to the model’? A Delphi study. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 37, 341345. doi: 10.1017/S1352465809005281 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, VA, Anderson, P, Northam, E, Jacobs, R, Catroppa, C (2001). Development of executive functions through late childhood and adolescence in an Australian sample. Developmental Neuropsychology 20, 385406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, AT (1979). Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
Beck, JS (2011). Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Basics and Beyond. New York, NY: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Bordin, ES (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research Practice 16, 252260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conklin, HM, Luciana, M, Hooper, CJ, Yarger, RS (2007). Working memory performance in typically developing children and adolescents: behavioral evidence of protracted frontal lobe development. Developmental Neuropsychology 31, 103128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creed, TA, Kendall, PC (2005). Therapist alliance-building behavior within a cognitive-behavioral treatment for anxiety in youth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 73, 498505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniels, J, Wearden, AJ (2011). Socialization to the model: the active component in the therapeutic alliance? A preliminary study. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 39, 221227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, BL, Miller, SD, Sparks, JA, Claud, DA, Reynolds, LR, Brown, J, Johnson, LD (2003). The Session Rating Scale: preliminary psychometric properties of a ‘working’ alliance measure. Journal of Brief Therapy 3, 312.Google Scholar
Fuggle, P, Dunsmuir, S, Curry, V (2012). CBT with Children, Young People and Families. London, UK: SAGE.Google Scholar
Karver, M, Shirk, S, Handelsman, JB, Fields, S, Crisp, H, Gudmundsen, G, McMakin, D (2008). Relationship processes in youth psychotherapy: measuring alliance, alliance-building behaviors, and client involvement. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 16, 1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roos, J, Wearden, A (2009). What do we mean by ‘socialization to the model’? A Delphi study. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 37, 341345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirk, SR, Karver, MS, Brown, R (2011). The alliance in child and adolescent psychotherapy. Psychotherapy 48, 1724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stallard, P (2002a). Cognitive behaviour therapy with children and young people: a selective review of key issues. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 30, 297309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallard, P (2002b). Think Good – Feel Good: A Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Workbook for Children and Young People. John Wiley.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.
1
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Socialization to the model in adolescent cognitive behavioural therapy: measurement and insights
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Socialization to the model in adolescent cognitive behavioural therapy: measurement and insights
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Socialization to the model in adolescent cognitive behavioural therapy: measurement and insights
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *