Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:33:26.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unilateral ECT as a Test for Cerebral Dominance, with a Strategy for Treating Left-handers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

R. T. C. Pratt ,
Elizabeth K. Warrington  and
A. M. Halliday
R. T. C. Pratt
Affiliation:
The National Hospitals for Nervous Diseases, Queen Square, W.C.1 and Maida Vale, W.9
Elizabeth K. Warrington
Affiliation:
The National Hospital for Nervous Diseases, Queen Square, W.C.1
A. M. Halliday
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council; National Hospital for Nervous Diseases, Queen Square, W.C.1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The growing adoption of ECT given unilaterally to the right hemisphere in right-handed patients, in preference to the classical bilateral treatment, is due to its shortening of the duration of post-treatment confusion, to its superiority in preserving memory and learning assessed three months after the start of treatment (Halliday et al., 1968) and to its therapeutic equivalence. (For a critical assessment of published results, see d'Elia, 1970.)

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 119 , Issue 548 , July 1971 , pp. 79 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1971 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

d'Elia, G. (1970). ‘Unilateral electro-convulsive therapy.’ Acta Psychiatrica et Neurologica Scandinavica, Suppl. 215.Google Scholar
Fleminger, J. J., Horne, D. J. de L., Nair, N. P. V., and Nott, P. N. (1970a). ‘Differential effect of unilateral and bilateral ECT.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 1127, 430–6.Google Scholar
Fleminger, J. J., Horne, D. J. de L., Nair, N. P. V., and Nott, P. N. (1970b). ‘Unilateral electroconvulsive therapy and cerebral dominance: effect of right- and left-sided electrode placement on verbal memory.’ Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 33, 408–11.Google Scholar
Halliday, A. M., Davison, K., Browne, M. W., and Kreeger, L. C. (1968). ‘A comparison of the effects on depression and memory of bilateral ECT and unilateral ECT to the dominant and non-dominant hemispheres.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 997–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, R. C., and Wingfield, A. (1965). ‘Response latencies in naming objects.’ Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 273–81.Google Scholar
Serafetinides, E. A., Hoare, R. D., and Driver, M. V. (1965). ‘Intracarotid sodium amylobarbitone and cerebral dominance for speech and consciousness.’ Brain, 88, 107–30.Google Scholar
Warrington, E. K., and James, M. (1967). ‘Disorders of visual perception in patients with localized cerebral lesions.’ Neuropsychologia, 5, 253–66.Google Scholar
Zangwill, O. L. (1967). ‘Speech and the minor hemisphere.’ Acta Neurologica et Psychiatrica Belgica, 67, 1013–20.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.